Kalasin University Journal of Science Technology and Innovation https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sci_01 <p><strong>Kalasin University Journal of Science Technology and Innovation</strong></p> <div class="html-div xexx8yu x4uap5 x18d9i69 xkhd6sd x1gslohp x11i5rnm x12nagc x1mh8g0r x1yc453h x126k92a x18lvrbx" dir="auto"><strong>ที่มาและความสำคัญ</strong></div> <div class="html-div xexx8yu x4uap5 x18d9i69 xkhd6sd x1gslohp x11i5rnm x12nagc x1mh8g0r x1yc453h x126k92a x18lvrbx" dir="auto"> วารสารวิทยาศาสตร์ เทคโนโลยี และนวัตกรรม มหาวิทยาลัยกาฬสินธุ์ เริ่มดำเนินการเปิดรับบทความและตีพิมพ์เผยแพร่ปีที่ 1 ฉบับที่ 1 ตั้งแต่ปี 2565 เป็นต้นมา โดยจัดทำขึ้นเพื่อเผยแพร่ผลงานทางวิชาการของนักวิจัยและนักวิชาการทั้งในและต่างประเทศในสาขาอาชีพต่าง ๆ โดยเผยแพร่บทความวิจัย (research article) และบทความวิชาการ (academic article) ที่สะท้อนมุมมองสถานการณ์ที่เกิดขึ้นในสังคมไทย นำไปสู่การสร้างองค์ความรู้ใหม่และแลกเปลี่ยนประสบการณ์ทางวิชาการ</div> <p><strong>ISSN: 2821-9406 (Online)</strong></p> <p>Kalasin University Journal of Science Technology and Innovation (ISSN: 2821-9406) is available for qualified articles/manuscripts for publications with an aim to publish both versions of Thai and English on a digital platform.</p> <p>The area of content for publication approval covers four academic fields as follows:<br /> 1.1 Physical Science: Chemistry, Physics, Maths, Statistics and related studies<br /> 1.2 Biological Science: Biology, Animals, Plants, Genetics, Agricultures, Agriculture Industry, Biotechnology and related studies<br /> 1.3 Health Science: Public Health, Environmental Health, Environmental Sanitation, Sports, Sanitation Practices, Nutrition and related studies<br /> 1.4 Engineering and Architecture: Mechanics, Electrical Power, Public Works, Industries, Irrigations, Environment, Computer, Town Planning, Architecture, and related studies<br /> The target group is focused on teachers/instructors, students, researchers, and interested individuals of inside and outside Kalasin University.</p> <p>There are two issues of publication per year as follows:<br /> First round: January - June issue<br /> Second round: July - December issue</p> <p><strong>Publication Fee<br /></strong> (a) For article authors who are internal personnel, a fee of 2,000 THB per article must be paid.<br /> (b) For article authors who are external individuals, a fee of 3,000 THB per article must be paid.</p> <p> To proceed with the payment of the publication fee to the following account number:</p> <p> Bank: Krung Thai Bank, Kalasin Branch<br /> Name: Non-Budgetary Of Kalasin University<br /> Account Number: 404-3-19565-6</p> <p><strong>กระบวนการพิจารณาบทความสำหรับผู้นิพนธ์<br /></strong>กรุณาคลิกลิงค์ <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BXwUGyfg2F1yElstOtFYkgi13Oa_E5jr/view?usp=drive_link">https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1SEWyVsNBGLqfnAiUcbpke9hdzTx3AnKA?usp=sharing</a></p> <p><strong>Conditions for Article Processing Charges (APC):</strong><br /> 1) The APC will be enforced starting from Vol. 4, No. 1, onwards.<br /> 2) The APC will only be collected after the article passes the initial review from the editor.<br /> 3) If the peer reviewers reject an article, the journal will not refund any fees.</p> <p><strong>Remarks:</strong> The approval of publication must be annonymously proceeded through Double-Blind Peer Review process by 3 field experts in the area of content.</p> <p> </p> en-US <p>The owner (Research and Development Institute, Kalasin University), the authors agree that any copies of the article or any part thereof distributed or posted by them in print or electronic format as permitted will include the notice of copyright as stipulated in the journal and a full citation to the final published version of the contribution in the journal as published by Research and Development Institute, Kalasin University.</p> keyoon.du@ksu.ac.th (รองศาสตราจารย์ ดร.เกยูร ดวงอุปมา) sci_journal@ksu.ac.th (นางสาวนภัทรธิดา พรมดีราช) Thu, 02 Jul 2026 20:55:00 +0700 OJS 3.3.0.8 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 A Causal Model of Factors Affecting Government Nurses’ Intentions to Use Artificial Intelligence for Counseling in Thailand https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sci_01/article/view/272298 <p>This study aimed to develop and validate a causal model and to examine the direct and indirect effects of factors influencing nurses’ intention to use artificial intelligence (AI) for counseling. The research instrument was a questionnaire whose content validity was evaluated by three experts. The Item–Objective Congruence (IOC) indices for all items ranged from 0.67 to 1.00. The reliability of the instrument was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from .935 to .968. Data were collected through an online questionnaire administered to 396 public-sector nurses selected using a proportionate multistage sampling technique. Descriptive statistics, including mean scores, were used for data analysis. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was conducted using LISREL software to test the proposed causal model.</p> <p>The findings indicated that the proposed causal model fit the empirical data well (χ² = 22.18, df = 19, p = .28, χ²/df = 1.17, RMSEA = .02, RMR = .01, and CFI = 1.00). Regarding total effects, environmental factors exhibited the strongest influence on nurses’ intention to use AI for counseling (TE = .94), followed by personal factors (TE = .13), both of which were statistically significant at the .01 level. In terms of direct effects, environmental factors exerted the greatest direct influence (DE = .85), followed by personal factors (DE = .67), with both effects reaching statistical significance at the .01 level. Regarding indirect effects, environmental factors had the strongest indirect influence through personal factors, with an effect size of .09, which was statistically significant at the .01 level. Together, environmental factors (ENV) and personal factors (PEF) explained 90% of the variance in public-sector nurses’ intention to use AI for counseling (OBI).</p> Pagamart ONG-ART, Chaiyos Paiwithayasiritham, Yuwaree Yanprechaset Copyright (c) 2026 Kalasin University Journal of Science Technology and Innovation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sci_01/article/view/272298 Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0700 Effects of Dried Azolla Meal as a Substitute for Soybean Meal in Diets of Labeo rohita https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sci_01/article/view/271468 <p>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dried Azolla (<em>Azolla pinnata</em>) as a replacement for soybean meal in the diets of rohu fish (<em>Labeo rohita</em>). The experiment consisted of four dietary treatments with three replicates per treatment. Experimental diets were formulated by replacing soybean meal protein with dried Azolla at levels of 0, 20, 40, and 60%, resulting in crude protein contents of 29.42, 29.37, 27.77, and 27.15%, respectively. Rohu juveniles with an average initial weight of 4.91 g were reared for 90 days in cages (2 × 2 × 1 m) at a stocking density of 100 fish per cage. At the end of the experiment, the average weight gain was 20.91 ± 3.76, 19.54 ± 2.69, 21.37 ± 2.74, and 21.95 ± 1.78 g for the 0, 20, 40, and 60% replacement groups, respectively. The average daily gain was 0.23 ± 0.06, 0.20 ± 0.02, 0.28 ± 0.07, and 0.25 ± 0.05 g day⁻¹, while the specific growth rate was 1.82 ± 0.25, 1.70 ± 0.13, 2.01 ± 0.27, and 1.90 ± 0.19% day⁻¹, respectively. Survival rates were 41.00 ± 3.06, 46.67 ± 2.51, 56.00 ± 19.67, and 47.33 ± 4.10%, respectively. Feed conversion ratios were 2.40 ± 0.37, 2.61 ± 0.25, 2.18 ± 0.34, and 2.29 ± 0.25, while feed efficiency values were 0.42 ± 0.06, 0.38 ± 0.03, 0.46 ± 0.07, and 0.43 ± 0.05, respectively. The protein efficiency ratio was 1.36 ± 0.19, 1.31 ± 0.13, 1.67 ± 0.26, and 1.66 ± 0.19, respectively No significant differences were observed among treatments for growth performance, feed utilization, or survival (p &gt; 0.05). However, fish fed the diet containing 40% dried Azolla exhibited a tendency toward higher survival compared with the other treatments without any adverse effects on growth performance. The findings indicate that dried Azolla can be used as an alternative protein source to replace soybean meal in rohu diets at levels up to 40% without negatively affecting growth performance or feed utilization, despite having a lower dietary protein content than some of the other experimental diets.</p> Apirat Eakchatpana, Nattiya Chumnanka, Sugunya Kumla, Patcharawalai Sriyasak, Supannee Suwanpakdee, Naiyana Senasri Copyright (c) 2026 Kalasin University Journal of Science Technology and Innovation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sci_01/article/view/271468 Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0700 Response Behavior of a Control System for a Single-Beam Twin-Propeller Vertical Balancing Flight Model Using a P, PI, PD, and PID Controller https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sci_01/article/view/272457 <p>This research aims to develop a single-beam twin-propeller vertical balancing flight model and compare the response behaviors of the system controlled by four controller types: P, PI, PD, and PID controllers. In the experiments, the beam equilibrium position was set to 90°. The response tests were then conducted at reference angles of 110°, 120°, and 130°. The system performance was evaluated in terms of overshoot, settling time, and steady-state error. At the reference angle of 110 °, the PD controller provided the best overshoot performance, with an overshoot of 0.50%, a settling time of 2.01 s, and a steady-state error of 0.55 °. Meanwhile, the PID controller produced an overshoot of 1.86%, a settling time of 2.43 s, and a steady-state error of 1.90 °. At the reference angle of 120 °, the PD controller achieved the lowest overshoot of 0.41%, with a settling time of 4.02 s and a steady-state error of 0.45 °. At the reference angle of 130 °, the PD controller produced an overshoot of 3.73%, a settling time of 1.15 s, and a steady-state error of 4.10 °. The PID controller produced an overshoot of 6.04%, a settling time of 2.97 s, and a steady-state error of 3.20 °. The experimental results show that the PD controller is the most suitable for reducing overshoot and achieving a fast response, while the PID controller can compensate for steady-state error.</p> Somjate Bunchuen, Channarong Thaoarsa, Woranat Changto, Nattawut Kamlueng, Thaweesak Worachak, Poth Chaiaye, Nattapong Nernchad, Thanapoom Fuangpian, Umaporn Chanthima Copyright (c) 2026 Kalasin University Journal of Science Technology and Innovation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sci_01/article/view/272457 Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0700