Journal of Food Health and Bioenvironmental Science https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sdust <p><strong>Change of journal title in 2018</strong></p> <p><strong><em>Journal of Food Health and Bioenvironmental Science (JFHB)</em></strong> was formerly named SDU Research Journal Sciences and Technology, and was first published in 2009 with ISSN 1906-3334 (Print) and ISSN 2408-1574 (Online). The editorial board modified the journal in 2018 to enhance its quality, aim, and scope. The name was also changed to Journal of Food Health and Bioenvironmental Science; it was only published online and had an ISSN of 2630-0311 (Online).</p> <p><strong>Change of submission platform</strong></p> <p>On October 1, 2023, our journal switched from using ScholarOne to using Thai ES: Thai Editorial System as the submission platform. However, until the end of December 2023, the manuscripts that our team is now reviewing will be accessible on ScholarOne. On January 1, 2024, the Journal of Food Health and Bioenvironmental Science (JFHB) will change the submission platform from ScholarOne to Thai ES: Thai Editorial System.</p> <p><strong>Statement of Publication Malpractice</strong></p> <p>Misconduct in publication of any kind is unacceptable in order to uphold integrity and ethical standards. The principles are as follows:</p> <ol> <li><strong>Plagiarism</strong></li> </ol> <p> JFHB does not allow any form of plagiarism, including efforts to misuse someone else's work improperly. At JFHB, plagiarism is taken seriously, and if it is found, the work will be rejected immediately.</p> <ol start="2"> <li><strong>Fabrication and Falsification</strong></li> </ol> <p> The information provided in the manuscript must to be reliable and accurate. The author(s) must make ensure that the data they include in the publication are correct and verifiable. There must be no fabrication or falsification of results and data. Manipulation or misrepresentation is also not acceptable.</p> <ol start="3"> <li><strong>Multiple Submission</strong></li> </ol> <p> JFHB does not consider manuscripts that are in process with other journals. Multiple submissions are prohibited under ethical standards.</p> <ol start="4"> <li><strong>Authorship Disputes</strong></li> </ol> <p> The author(s) must understand that authorship should be determined by the contribution made to the work and that authorship should be correctly declared. Any authorship disputes should be resolved before submission to JFHB.</p> <ol start="5"> <li><strong>Peer Review Integrity</strong></li> </ol> <p> JFHB guarantees fairness and honesty in the peer review procedure. To prevent any type of manipulation, we use a double-blind review.</p> <ol start="6"> <li><strong>Retraction and Corrections</strong></li> </ol> <p> JFHB will respond appropriately immediately if significant errors or misconduct are discovered in an article that has already been published. The correction will be performed in a transparent manner while following to the current regulations.</p> <ol start="7"> <li><strong>Report of Misconduct</strong></li> </ol> <p> JFHB is open to complaints about ethics violations and misconduct throughout the publication process from authors, reviewers, and writers. The necessary actions will be taken professionally.</p> <p>We suspect that research has the potential to advance the entire country and improve people's quality of life. JFHB will continue providing the research community with support while upholding exceptionally high ethical and moral standards.</p> en-US [email protected] (Tita Foophaow) [email protected] (Nongnuch Rungsawang) Thu, 25 Apr 2024 16:26:56 +0700 OJS 3.3.0.8 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Antioxidant and Anti-acne Activities of Stingless Bee Honey and Propolis Extract https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sdust/article/view/262454 <p> Stingless bees form a large group of bees that lack a sting and are found in tropical and sub-tropical</p> <p>areas. Honey and propolis are major products that are produced by the stingless bee. This study aimed to investigate honey and propolis extracts, leading us to isolate bioactive compounds for their antioxidant and anti-acne properties. The four different stingless bee species (<em>Geniotrigona thoracica</em>, <em>Heterotrigona itama</em>, <em>Tetragonula</em> <em>pagdeni</em>, and <em>Lepidotrigona terminate</em>), collected from a community enterprise area (southern Thailand). The raw propolis was extracted via maceration with 20% ethanol. The present study aimed to assess the concentration of phenolics and flavonoids using Folin-Ciocalteu method, Aluminum Chloride Colorimetry method and DPPH respectively, as well as the <strong>antibacterial </strong>against bacteria <em>Propionibacterium acne</em> (DMST 14917) using the agar well diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values were determined by the in vitro method.The findings indicate that <em>G</em><em>. </em><em>thoracica</em> honey has the highest content of total phenolic (30.28±0.51mgGAE/g), flavonoids (59.77±0.05 mg RE/g), and DPPH (1.251±0.27mg/ml), while the phenolic (25.34±0.06 mgGAE/g), flavonoids (44.33±0.41) and DPPH (2.210±0.28) of <em>H</em><em>. </em><em>itama</em> propolis extract are higher than those of the other extracts.The antibacterial activity of the honey against <em>P. acne</em> was categorized as highly strong inhibitory, while propolis extract was classified as moderate inhibitory. Additionally, <em>G</em><em>. </em><em>thoracica</em> honey exhibits the highest antibacterial activity against <em>P</em><em>.</em><em> acnes</em> at 37.74±1.5 mm, MIC (62.5 µg/ml) and MBC (125 µg/ml), while <br /><em>H</em><em>. </em><em>itama</em> propolis extract was 14.43±2.7 mm, MIC (125 µg/ml) and MBC (250 µg/ml). These results indicated that stingless bee honey and propolis extracts contain valuable quantities of phenolic and flavonoid compounds, which serve as natural anti-oxidants and exhibit notable anti-microbial activity. The results suggest that stingless bee products hold commercial potential as a natural source of bioactive ingredients to be formulated into cosmetic agents.</p> Duangduan Wattanuruk, Nathapong Matintarangson Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Food Health and Bioenvironmental Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sdust/article/view/262454 Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0700 Diversity and Structure of Aquatic Insect Communities in Relation to Water Quality Parameters in The Kasetsart University Drainage Ditches, Central Thailand https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sdust/article/view/262361 <p>This study evaluates the impact of anthropogenic influence on the drainage ditches of Kasetsart University's Kamphaeng Saen Campus in Nakhon Pathom Province, using water quality measurements and aquatic insect data collected during a six-month period from October 2022 to March 2023. Six sampling ditches with various human activities were chosen. Organic wastes from agriculture, residences and buildings were the primary causes of pollution. A total of 6,232 aquatic insects from six orders—Hemiptera (28.32%), Coleoptera (7.76%), Odonata (12.52%), Diptera (36.33%), Ephemeroptera (2.47%) and Trichoptera (12.6%)—were collected. In the current study, the order Diptera was the most diversified and relatively abundant in all sampling sites. However, the order Trichoptera was most common in KUKPS6, a running water ditch. The orders Hemiptera and Coleoptera had the highest abundance in the KUKPS1, while Odonata and Ephemeroptera had the highest abundance in KUKPS2. The Shannon-Weiner diversity index for aquatic insects was between 1.527 and 2.959, indicating slightly good water quality. According to the Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA), dissolved oxygen, orthophosphate, nitrate-nitrogen, turbidity and pH were the most influential factors. Based on the data on physicochemical water quality and entomofauna composition, the results concluded that Kasetsart University's drainage ditches were slightly polluted.</p> Taeng On Prommi, Pattrawan Khamboonruang , Sravut Klorvuttimontara Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Food Health and Bioenvironmental Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sdust/article/view/262361 Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0700 Comparison of Pebbles Growing Media from Agricultural Waste Materials on Productivity Growth of Melon (cv. Orange Man and cv. Galia 248) Cultivated in Greenhouse Conditions https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sdust/article/view/261926 <p>The objective of this research project was to compare the results from the use of pebbles growing media made from agricultural waste suitable for the growth and productivity of two cultivars, Orange Man melon and Galia 248 melon in a greenhouse. Pebbles growing media could reduce cost from the traditional material used for growing melon and have higher productivity for farmers. The experiment was divided into 5 experimental sets, namely, set that uses 100% of pebbles from agricultural waste (T1), set that uses normal planting material(coconut husk and chopped coconut coir in the ratio of2 to 1), 25 percent mixed with pebbles from agricultural waste at 75 percent (T2), 50 percent mixed with pebbles from agricultural waste at 50 percent (T3), 75 percent mixed with pebbles from agricultural waste at 25 percent (T4), and normal planting material 100 percent (T5).The research methodology is CRD, with one-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). In addition, the pair test with Scheffe’s method to compare the difference that affects fruit weight of the melon at 42 days after pollination was used. The comparison of the means and standard deviation were performed by Scheffe’s method at P ≤ 0.05 significance level. From the growth and productivity records of two cultivars melon, it was found that the experimental set that is most suitable is T2 which gave high yield of fruit width, fruit length, fruit weight and Brix value. Orange Man cultivars grown with T2 exhibited the average fruit width, fruit length, fruit weight and Brix value at 23.6±1.8 cm, 23.7±1.9 cm, 1.9±0.1 kg and 16±0.0 degrees Brix, respectively and Galia 248 cultivars grown with T2 exhibited the average fruit width, fruit length, fruit weight and Brix value at 23.2±0.8 cm, 24.4±1.2 cm, 1.9±0.1 kg and 15±0.6 degrees Brix, respectively. These results indicated that the factors of cultivar and treatment at the time of pollination are not different from each other with the statistical significance and confidence level of 95 percent compared with melons grown with T5 (normal planting material). These findings can lead to benefit farmers by reducing the cost of growing material for as much as 75 percent per time. The new material are easily manageable as well as having a long service life.</p> Yuttaya Yuyen, Suchaya Kiattiprajuksa Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Food Health and Bioenvironmental Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sdust/article/view/261926 Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0700