To & Fro Versus Mapleson D Circuit – A Comparative Study of Capillary Blood Gas.
Abstract
The comparative study of the modified To & Fro circuit and the Mapleson D circuit blood gas technique was chosen as a method of comparison due to its simplicity and no injury to vessel. Using constant FGF, Fi02 and minute ventilation, it was found that the modified To & Fro circuit showed lower pC02 than the Mapleson D circuit significantly.
Downloads
How to Cite
1.
Theerapongpakdee S, Nilpiboon P. To & Fro Versus Mapleson D Circuit – A Comparative Study of Capillary Blood Gas. SRIMEDJ [Internet]. 2013 Nov. 11 [cited 2025 Jan. 10];1(3):199-204. Available from: https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SRIMEDJ/article/view/13274
Issue
Section
Original Articles