Main Article Content
Background and objective: To determine Thai adult age by analyzing dental root translucency and periodontosis for using in unknown dead body.
Methods: A cross-sectional study of 398 teeth from 345 Thai adult with known actual chronological age was conducted. The root translucency height (t), periodontosis height (p), and root height (r) were measured using the Lamendin’s technique. Sex, age, tooth types and tooth positions were analyzed by descriptive statistics. The correlation between age and three tooth parameters were analyzed by Pearson's correlation and multiple regression analysis using statistical significance at p<0.05.
Results: Dental root translucency and periodontosis were able to estimate Thai adult age with statistical significance (p<0.001). The proposed equation derived from multiple regression analysis was Age = 16.038 + (0.572 x P) + (0.567 x T), where (P = p*100/r, T = t*100/r). The mean error was ±5.2 years. In addition, Thai formula for male and female were Age = 13.816 + (0.669 x P) + (0.57 x T) and Age = 17.449 + (0.505 x P) + (0.567 x T), respectively when sex was known. These Thai formulas showed a better precision in the young adult (20-50 years old).
Conclusion: Single tooth was able to estimate Thai adult age by using dental root translucency and periodontosis parameters in all tooth types and positions with a simple method.
2. Lamendin H, Baccino E, Humbert JF, Tavernier JC, Nossintchouk RM, Zerilli A. A simple technique for age estimation in adult corpses: the two criteria dental method. J Forensic Sci 1992; 37: 1373–9.
3. Johanson G. Age determinations from human teeth: A critical evaluation with special consideration of changes after fourteen years of age. Odontologisk Revy 1971; 22: 1–126.
4. Prince DA, Ubelaker DH. Application of Lamendin's adult dental aging technique to a diverse skeletal sample. J Forensic Sci 2002; 47: 107-16.
5. Babshet M, Acharya AB, Naikmasur VG. Age estimation from pulp/tooth area ratio (PTR) in an Indian sample: A preliminary comparison of three mandibular teeth used alone and in combination. J Forensic Leg Med 2011; 18: 350–4.
6. Kumar NN, Panchaksharappaa MG, Annigeri RG. Digitized morphometric analysis of dental pulp of permanent mandibular second molar for age estimation of Davangere population. J Forensic Leg Med 2016; 39: 85–90.
7. Penaloza TY, Karkhanis S, Kvaal SI, Nurul F, Kanagasingam S, Franklin D. Application of the Kvaal method for adult dental age estimation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). J Forensic Leg Med 2016; 44: 178–82.
8. Maples WR. An improved technique using dental histology for estimation of adult age. J Forensic Sci 1978; 23: 764–70.
9. Gonzalez-Comenares G, Botella-Lopez MC, Moreno-Rueda G, Fernandez-Cardente JR. Age estimation by a dental method: A comparison of Lamendin’s and Prince & Ubelaker’s technique. J Forensic Sci 2007; 52: 1156–60.
10. Pinchi V, Pradella F, Buti J, Baldinotti C, Focardi M, Norelli GA. A new age estimation procedure based on the 3D CBCT study of the pulp cavity and hard tissues of the teeth for forensic purposes: A pilot study. J Forensic Leg Med 2015; 36: 150–7.
11. Solheim T, Kvaal S. Dental root surface structure as an indicator of age. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1993; 11: 9-21.
12. Solheim T. Dental root translucency as an indicator of age. Scand J Dent Res 1989; 97: 189-97.
13. Acharya AB. Forensic dental age estimation by measuring root dentin translucency area using a new digital technique. J Forensic Sci 2014; 59: 763-8.