Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Core-Needle Biopsy of Non-Palpable Breast Masses

Main Article Content

Siriprinya Poontananggoon

Abstract

were found. Therefore, ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy was also introduced to identify and get sample tissue, instead of open-excisional biopsy. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy compared to open-excisional biopsy.


Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive study done in Maharat Nakhonratchasima hostpital breast-masses patients, after having both ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy and open-excisional biopsy. Pathological examination results from both methods were compared.


Results: From January, 2012 to July, 2015, there were 91 patients who had been biopsied by both methods. Most abnormal pathological results from ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy were benign in 68.13%. Cancer-related results were found in 21.98%. 81 patients had results that were in consistent with open-excisional biopsy.


Conclusion: In non-palpable breast masses, pathological examination results from ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy had high accuracy rate of 89.1%(95%CI, 82.58-95.44%), when compared to open-excisional biopsy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Original Articles

References

1. Liberman L. Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000; 38: 791–807.
2. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, Kaelin C, DiPiro PJ, Denison CM, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. J Am Med Assoc 1999; 281: 1638–41.
3. Parker SH. Percutaneous large core breast biopsy. Cancer 1994; 74(1 S): 256–62.
4. Zhou JY, Tang J, Wang ZL, Lv FQ, Luo YK, Qin HZ, et al. Accuracy of 16/18G core needle biopsy for ultrasound-visible breast lesions. World J Surg Oncol 2014; 12: 7.
5. Verkooijen HM, Peeters PHM, Buskens E, Koot VCM, Borel Rinkes IHM, Mali WPTM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of large core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: A meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2000; 82: 1017–21.
6. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF. US-guided core breast biopsy: Use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998; 208: 717–23.
7. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.
8. Burbank F, Parker SH. Methods for evaluating the quality of an image-guided breast biopsy program. In: Parker SH. Interventional Breast Procedures. In: Feig SA, (ed.) Seminars in breast disease. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1998; 1: 71-83.
9. Pijnappel RM, van Dalen A, Borel Rinkes IH, van den Tweel JG, Mali WP. The diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy in palpable and non-palpable breast lesions. Eur J Radiol 1997; 24: 120–3.
10. Farshid G, Downey P, Pieterse S, Gill PG. Effectiveness of core biopsy for screen-detected breast lesions under 10 mm: implications for surgical management. ANZ J Surg 2017; 87: 725–31.
11. Giuliani M, Rinaldi P, Rella R, Fabrizi G, Petta F, Carlino G, et al. Effect of Needle Size in Ultrasound-guided Core Needle Breast Biopsy: Comparison of 14-, 16-, and 18-Gauge Needles. Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 17: 536–43.
12. Huang ML, Hess K, Candelaria RP, Eghtedari M, Adrada BE, Sneige N, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of US-guided biopsy of breast masses performed with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge automated cutting needle biopsy devices, and review of the literature. Eur Radiol. 2017; 27: 2928–33.
13. Koskela AK, Sudan M, Berg MH, Kärjä VJ, Mustonen PK, Kataja V, et al. Add-on device for stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy: How many biopsy specimens are needed for a reliable diagnosis? Radiology 2005; 236: 801–9.
14. Verkooijen HM, Buskens E, Peeters PHM, Borel Rinkes IHM, De Koning HJ, Van Vroonhoven TJMV. Diagnosing non-palpable breast disease: Short-term impact on quality of life of large-core needle biopsy versus open breast biopsy. Surg Oncol 2002; 10: 177–81.
15. Bulte JP, Polman L, Schlooz-Vries M, Werner A, Besselink R, Sessink K, et al. One-day core needle biopsy in a breast clinic: 4 years experience. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 137: 609–16.
16. Loughran CF, Keeling CR. Seeding of tumour cells following breast biopsy: a literature review. Br J Radiol 2011; 84(1006): 869–74.
17. Brenner RJ, Gordon LM. Malignant seeding following percutaneous breast biopsy: Documentation with comprehensive imaging and clinical implications. Breast J 2011; 17: 651–6.