Incidence and Predictors of Residual Disease in Women with High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) and Positive Margins after Cervical Loop Electrosurgical Excision

Main Article Content

Chalita Kingnate

Abstract

Background and Objective: Women who have high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and positive margins after an initial cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) carry a risk of invasive cervical carcinoma if left untreated. This study aimed to find factors predicting residual disease in women with histologic HSIL and positive margins after LEEP.


Methods: This retrospective cohort study was undertaken among women with histologic HSIL who had positive surgical margins following LEEP at Lamphun Hospital between January 2014 and March 2020. Factors predicting residual lesion were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.


Results: One hundred and thirteen women were included, residual disease was found in 56 women (49.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that only age >35 years (AOR = 10.8; 95%CI 1.1-109.8, p = 0.045) and a large lesion on LEEP specimen (3-4 quadrants) (AOR = 9.5; 95%CI 3.4-26.2, p <0.001) were significantly independent factors associated with residual disease.


Conclusions: Age >35 years and large lesion are the significant independent predictors for residual disease in women who had HSIL with positive margins after LEEP.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Kingnate C. Incidence and Predictors of Residual Disease in Women with High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) and Positive Margins after Cervical Loop Electrosurgical Excision. SRIMEDJ [Internet]. 2020 Sep. 8 [cited 2024 Mar. 29];35(5):515-22. Available from: https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SRIMEDJ/article/view/246668
Section
Original Articles

References

1. Cervical Cancer Incidence, Mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2018: Summary [Internet]. [cited April 25, 2020]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/factsheet.asp.
2. Cancer Registry Unit, Information Technology Division, National Cancer Institute, Department of medical services, Ministry of public health. Hospital-based cancer registry 2018. Bangkok, Thailand, 2019.
3. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Pineros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer 2019; 144: 1941-53.
4. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Munoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol 2002; 55: 244-65.
5. Egemen D, Cheung LC, Chen X, Demarco M, Perkins RB, Kinney W, et al. Risk Estimates Supporting the 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2020; 24: 132-43.
6. Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, Chelmow D, Einstein MH, Garcia F, et al. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2020; 24: 102-31.
7. Arbyn M, Redman CWE, Verdoodt F, Kyrgiou M, Tzafetas M, Ghaem-Maghami S, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 1665-79.
8. ปิยวัฒน์ เลาวหุตานนท์, อาคม ชัยวีระวัฒนะ, วีรวุฒิ อิ่มสำราญ. แนวทางการตรวจคัดกรอง วินิจฉัยและรักษาโรคมะเร็งปากมดลูก. กรุงเทพฯ: สถาบันมะเร็งแห่งชาติ กรมการแพทย์ กระทรวงสาธารณสุข; 2561: 1-109.
9. Ayhan A, Tuncer HA, Reyhan NH, Kuscu E, Dursun P. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 201: 1-6.
10. Fu Y, Chen C, Feng S, Cheng X, Wang X, Xie X, et al. Residual disease and risk factors in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and positive margins after initial conization. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2015; 11: 851-6.
11. Kietpeerakool C, Khunamornpong S, Srisomboon J, Siriaunkgul S, Suprasert P. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease? J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2007; 33: 660-4.
12. Ngamjarus C, Chongsuvivatwong V. n4Studies: Sample size and power calculations for iOS.: The Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program - The Thailand Research Fund & Prince of Songkla University; 2014.
13. Wayne WD. Biostatistics: A foundations of analysis in the health sciences (6th ed.): John Wiley&Sons, Inc.; 1995.
14. Kingnate C, Supoken A, Kleebkaow P, Chumworathayi B, Luanratanakorn S, Kietpeerakool C. Is Age an Independent Predictor of High-Grade Histopathology in Women Referred for Colposcopy after Abnormal Cervical Cytology? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 16: 7231-5.