Tube Excision in Extrusion of Glaucoma Drainage Device Tube: A Case Report

Main Article Content

Kwanchanoke Kumsiang
Jitkhemanich Rattanaphurithanakul
Niphon Sayawat

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Glaucoma drainage devices have been widely used in management of complicated glaucoma. More incidence of complications of the devices have been reported. The aim of this study was to report a case with extrusion of glaucoma drainage device tube from anterior chamber and to present the surgical correction by excision of the tube.


Methods: Report a case of extrusion of glaucoma drainage device tube from the anterior chamber and review literatures.


Results: A 58-year-old male diagnosed with advanced glaucoma underwent glaucoma drainage device in the right eye 2 years ago. The extrusion of glaucoma drainage device tube from anterior chamber had been noted and no sign of infection was detected. The patient underwent tube excision and was followed for further exposure at 2 and 6 weeks. There was no tube exposure and sign of infection at 2 weeks. Unfortunately, there was minimal tube exposure at 6 weeks follow-up, but no sign of infection was detected but tube was further exposure at 12 weeks post-operation so the patient underwent second operation for tube excision with more lengthening than the first operation to made tube contraction under scleral patch graft covering. Scleral patch graft was suture fixed to patient’s sclera for prevention of re-exposure. The result of second operation at 1, 2 and 4 weeks follow-up was no re-exposure and sign of infection.


Conclusions: Exposed glaucoma drainage device tube with no sign of infection can be immediately treatment not only medications but also surgical revision to prevent infection. This report shows alternative management of exposed tube by excision of exposed tube and surgical technique to solve the cause of re-extrusion. However, additional studies are required to determine the proper management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Kumsiang K, Rattanaphurithanakul J, Sayawat N. Tube Excision in Extrusion of Glaucoma Drainage Device Tube: A Case Report . SRIMEDJ [Internet]. 2022 Jun. 24 [cited 2022 Oct. 5];37(3):280-6. Available from: https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SRIMEDJ/article/view/255016
Section
Case report

References

Alawi A, AlBeshri A, Schargel K, Ahmad K, Malik R. Tube revision outcomes for exposure with different repair techniques. Clin Opthalmol 2020;14:3001–8.

Riva I, Roberti G, Oddone F, Konstas AG, Quaranta L. Ahmed glaucoma valve implant: surgical technique and complications. Clin Ophthalmol 2017;11:357–67.

Netland P, Chaku M, Ishida K, Rhee D. Risk factors for tube exposure as a late complication of glaucoma drainage implant surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:547-553.

Melamed S, Cahane M, Gutman I, Blumenthal M. Postoperative complications after Molteno implant surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1991 ;111:319-22. 5.

Mills RP, Reynolds A, Emond MJ. Longterm survival of Molteno glaucoma drainage devices. Ophthalmology 1996 ;103:299-305. 6.

Ayyala RS, Zurakowski D, Smith JA. A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1968- 76.

Chaku M, Netland PA, Ishida K, Rhee JR. Risk factors for tube exposure as a late complication of glaucoma drainage implant surgery. Clin Opthalmol 2016;10:547-53.

Menon M, Singh A, Balasubramaniyam A. Management of recurrent tube exposure in a challenging scenario. Delhi J Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2017. [cited Mar 14, 2021]; 28:35-6.

Oana S, Vila J. Tube exposure repair. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2012;6(3):139–42.

Kim HJ, Jeong S, Lim SH. Delayed-onset retrobulbar hemorrhage and glaucoma drainage device extrusion in a patient on anticoagulation: a case report. Case Rep Ophthalmol 2020;11(2):457–65.

Singh P, Kuldeep K, Tyagi M, Sharma P, Kumar Y. Glaucoma drainage devices. J Clin Ophthalmol Res 2013;1(2):77-82.

Surinder S. Managing tube migration following glaucoma drainage implant surgery. AAO 2019 Video Program

Dubey S, Prasanth B, Acharya MC, Narula R. Conjunctival erosion after glaucoma drainage device surgery: a feasible option. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61(7):355-7.

Giovingo M. Complications of glaucoma drainage device surgery: a review. Semin Ophthalmol 2014;29(5–6):397–402.

Al-Torbak AA, Al-Shahwan S, Al-Jadaan I, Al-Hommadi A, Edward DP. Endophthalmitis associated with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89(4):454–8.

Stewart WC, Kristoffersen CJ, Demos CM, Fsadni MG, Stewart JA. Incidence of conjunctival exposure following drainage device implantation in patients with glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2010;20(1):124–30.

Gedde SJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC. Postoperative complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153(5):804–14.

Al-Beishri AS , Malik R, Freidi A, Ahmad S. Risk factors for glaucoma drainage device exposure in a middle-eastern population. J Glaucoma 2019;28(6):529–34.

Lopilly Park H-Y, Jung KI, Park CK. Serial intracameral visualization of the Ahmed glaucoma valve tube by anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Eye (Lond) 2012;26(9):1256–62.

Smith MF, Doyle JW, Ticrney JW Jr. A comparison of glaucoma drain¬age implant tube coverage. J Glaucoma 2002;11(2):143–7.

Levinson JD, Giangiacomo AL, Beck AD, Pruett PB, Superak HM, Lynn MJ, et al. Glaucoma drainage devices: risk of exposure and infection. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;160(3):516-21.

Cennamo G, Forte R, Del Prete S, Cardone D. Scanning electron microscopy applied to impression cytology for conjunctival damage from glaucoma therapy. Cornea 2013;32(9):1227-31.

Minckler DS, Francis BA, Hodapp EA, Jampel H, Lin SC, Samples JR, et al. Aqueous shunts in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2008;115(6):1089–98.

Das JC, Chaudhuri Z, Sharma P, Bhomaj S. The Ahmed glaucoma valve in refractory glaucoma: experiences in Indian eyes. Eye (Lond) 2005;19(2):183–90.

Ayyala, RS, Zurakowski D, Smith JA, Monshizadeh R, Netland PA, Richards WD, et al. A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1998;105(10):1968-76.

Grover DS, Merritt J, Godfrey DG, Felllman RL. Forniceal conjunctival pedicle flap for the

treatment of complex glaucoma drainage device tube erosion. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013;131(5):

-6.

Ainsworth G, Rotchford A, Dua HA, King AJ. A novel use of amniotic membrane in the

management of tube exposure following glaucoma tube shunt surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90(4):417-9.

Einan-Lifshitz A, Belkin A, Mathew D, Sorkin N, Chan CC, Buys YM, et al. Repair of exposed Ahmed glaucoma valve tubes: long-term outcomes. J Glaucoma 2018;27(6):532–6.

Dubey S, Prasanth B, Acharya M, Narula R. Conjunctival erosion after glaucoma drainage device surgery: a feasible option. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61(7):355-7.