Current Situation of Allergy to Latex Protein in Medical Gloves and Preventive Measures among Health Personnel

Authors

  • Chatpong Ngamchokwathana Division of Community, Family, and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0455-1729
  • Naesinee Chaiear Division of Community, Family, and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University

Keywords:

latex allergy, gloves allergy, occupational health, health workers, hospital

Abstract

Since the 1980s, latex allergy has been a common occupational health problem for health personnel. While some western countries have successfully reduced the prevalence of latex allergy among health personnel from 8.3 – 17% to 2.9 – 5.9% after banning the usage of powdered latex gloves (the major source of latex allergen), latex allergy problem still presented in some developing countries. This review article aimed to identify the current situation and preventive measures to reduce the prevalence of latex allergy among health personnel, particularly in developing countries. The study found that the prevalence of latex allergy in some Asian countries, where powdered latex glove policies were not fully implemented, was slightly similar to those of Western countries after implementing the policy at 2 – 6.8%, suggesting a possible genetic component. Alongside glove replacement, in the later years, other preventive strategies could be implemented to reduce latex allergy cases among health personnel. These strategies include improving technology in the production process to reduce latex allergens in gloves at the industrial level, implementing educational programs to increase awareness and screening and surveillance systems to identify health personnel who may be at higher risk for developing latex allergy, and case management for workers with latex allergy. These measures may be more appropriate for developing countries where the implementation of a ban may not be feasible.

References

Bousquet J, Flahault A, Vandenplas O, Ameille J, Duron JJ, Pecquet C, et al. Natural rubber latex allergy among health care workers: a systematic review of the evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;118(2):447–54. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2006.03.048

Wu M, McIntosh J, Liu J. Current prevalence rate of latex allergy: why it remains a problem? J Occup Health 2016;58(2):138–44. doi.org/10.1539/joh.15-0275-RA

Nienhaus A, Kromark K, Raulf-Heimsoth M, van Kampen V, Merget R. Outcome of occupational latex allergy—work ability and quality of life. PLoS ONE 2008;3(10):e3459.

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH alert: preventing allergic reactions to natural rubber latex in the workplace. [Internet]. 3rd ed. Cincinati, OH; 1998 [cited 2023 Feb 22]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/97-135/default.html

Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Potential for sensitization and possible allergic reaction to natural rubber latex gloves and other natural rubber products [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2023 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/dts/shib/shib012808.html

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Banned devices; powdered surgeon’s gloves, powdered patient examination gloves, and absorbable powder for lubricating a surgeon’s glove. Fed Regist. 2016 Dec 19;81(243):91722-31.

Plastic Institute of Thailand. Opportunity of natural rubber latex medical gloves during COVID-19 pandemic [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Feb 25]. Available from: http://rubber.oie.go.th/Article.aspx?id=64178.

Abraham EK, Ramesh P. Natural rubber latex products: concerns in health care. J Macromol Sci Part C Polym Rev 2002;42(2):185–234. doi.org/10.1081/MC-120004763

Baur X. Measurement of airborne latex allergens. Methods 2002;27(1):59–62. doi.org/10.1016/S1046-2023(02)00052-X

Abbas M, Moussa M, Akel H. Type I Hypersensitivity Reaction. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 [cited Feb 25, 2023]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560561/

Chern A, Chern CM, Lushniak BD. Occupational skin diseases. In: Kang S, Amagai M, Bruckner AL, Enk AH, Margolis DJ, McMichael AJ, et al., editors. Fitzpatrick’s dermatology, 9e [Internet]. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2019 [cited 2023 Feb 22]. Available from: accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1161322897

Nucera E, Aruanno A, Rizzi A, Centrone M. Latex allergy: current status and future perspectives. J Asthma Allergy 2020;13:385–98. doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S242058

Chaiear N. The variability of the prevalence of latex sensitisation. Srinagarind Med J 2000;15(3):189–97.

Nettis E, Assennato G, Ferrannini A, Tursi A. Type I allergy to natural rubber latex and type IV allergy to rubber chemicals in health care workers with glove-related skin symptoms: Allergy to rubber latex and rubber chemicals. Clin Exp Allergy 2002;32(3):441–7. doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01308.x

Verna N, Giampaolo LD, Renzetti A, Balatsinou L, Stefano FD, Gioacchino GD, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for latex-related diseases among healthcare workers in an Italian general hospital. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2003;33(2):184–91.

Yassin MS, Lierl MB, Fischer TJ, O’Brien K, Cross J, Steinmetz C. Latex allergy in hospital employees. Ann Allergy 1994;72(3):245–9.

Liss GM, Sussman GL, Deal K, Brown S, Cividino M, Siu S, et al. Latex allergy: epidemiological study of 1351 hospital workers. Occup Environ Med 1997;54(5):335–42. doi.org/10.1136/oem.54.5.335

Groot H, Jong NW, Duijster E, Wijk RG, Vermeulen A, Toorenenbergen AW, et al. Prevalence of natural rubber latex allergy (type I and type IV) in laboratory workers in the Netherlands. Contact Dermatitis 1998;38(3):159–63. doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05684.x

Lamberti M, Buonanno R, Ritonnaro C, Giovane G, Crispino V, Feola A, et al. Molecular profile of sensitization in subjects with short occupational exposure to latex. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2015;28(5):841–8. doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00413

Diéguez MC, Pulido Z, de la Hoz B, Blanco R, Cerecedo I, Fernández-Caldas E, et al. Latex allergy in healthcare workers: an epidemiological study in a Spanish hospital. Allergy Asthma Proc 2007;28(5):564–70. doi.org/10.2500/aap2007.28.3036

Galindo MJ, Quirce S, Garcia OL. Latex allergy in primary care providers. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2011;21(6):459–65.

Köse S, Mandiracioğlu A, Tatar B, Gül S, Erdem M. Prevalence of latex allergy among healthcare workers in Izmir (Turkey). Cent Eur J Public Health 2014;22(4):262–5. doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a3912

Chaiear N, Jindawong B, Boonsawas W, Kanchanarach T, Sakunkoo P. Glove allergy and sensitization to natural rubber latex among nursing staff at srinagarind hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2006;89(3):368-76

Teeraratkul A, Dangsuwan T, Wittitsuwannakul R, Kerdsomnuk S, Sawaengsakdi L, Roengrak S, et al. Epidemiology of latex allergy among healthcare personnel at Siriraj Hospital. Siriraj Hos Gaz 1997;49(9):837–45.

Supapvanich C, Povey AC, Vocht F de. Evaluation of proteins in natural rubber latex gloves and pulmonary function amongst female nurses in two tertiary hospitals in southern, Thailand. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 25]; Available from: http://apjai-journal.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/AP-310319-0530.pdf

Leung R, Ho A, Chan J, Choy D, Lai CKW. Prevalence of latex allergy in hospital staff in Hong Kong. Clin Exp Allergy 1997;27(2):167–74. doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1997.tb00689.x

Shahnaz M, Azizah MR, Hasma H, Mok KL, Yip E, Ganesapillai T, et al. Prevalence of latex hypersensitivity among health care workers in Malaysia. Med J Malaysia 1999 Mar;54(1):26–31.

Wan KS, Lue HC. Latex allergy in health care workers in Taiwan: prevalence, clinical features. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2007;80(5):455–7. doi.org/10.1007/s00420-006-0146-z

Brown RH, Hamilton RG, Mintz M, Jedlicka AE, Scott AL, Kleeberger SR. Genetic predisposition to latex allergy: role of interleukin 13 and interleukin 18. Anesthesiology 2005;102(3):496–502. doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200503000-00004

Toda M, Ono SJ. Genomics and proteomics of allergic disease. Immunology 2002;106(1):1–10. doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01407.x

Caballero ML, Quirce S. Identification and practical management of latex allergy in occupational settings. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2015;11(9):977–92. doi.org/10.1586/1744666X.2015.1059754

Parisi CAS, Kelly KJ, Ansotegui IJ, Gonzalez-Díaz SN, Bilò MB, Cardona V, et al. Update on latex allergy: New insights into an old problem. World Allergy Organ J 2021;14(8):100569. doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100569

Charous BL, Tarlo SM, Charous MA, Kelly K. Natural rubber latex allergy in the occupational setting. Methods 2002;27(1):15–21. doi.org/10.1016/S1046-2023(02)00047-6

Raulf M. Current state of occupational latex allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2020;20(2):112–6. doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000611

Korniewicz DM, Chookaew N, Brown J, Bookhamer N, Mudd K, Bollinger ME. Impact of converting to powder-free gloves: decreasing the symptoms of latex exposure in operating room personnel. AAOHN J 2005;53(3):111–6. doi.org/10.1177/216507990505300310

Clayton TH, Wilkinson SM. Contact dermatoses in healthcare workers: reduction in type I latex allergy in a UK centre. Clin Exp Dermatol 2005;30(3):221–5. doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.2005.01768.x

Saary MJ, Kanani A, Alghadeer H, Holness DL, Tarlo SM. Changes in rates of natural rubber latex sensitivity among dental school students and staff members after changes in latex gloves. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109(1):131–5. doi.org/10.1067/mai.2002.120557

Allmers H. Primary prevention of natural rubber latex allergy in the German health care system through education and intervention. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;110(2):6. doi.org/10.1067/mai.2002.126461

Edelstam G, Arvanius L, Karlsson G. Glove powder in the hospital environment – consequences for healthcare workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2002;75(4):267–71. doi.org/10.1007/s00420-001-0296-y

Gathen Y von der, Sander I, Flagge A, Brüning T, Raulf-Heimsoth M. Quantification of protein and latex allergen content of various natural rubber latex products. Allergol Sel 2017;1(2):109–19. doi.org/10.5414/ALX01461E

Notification of Ministry of Public Health: Prohibition on the production, import, or sale of powdered gloves for surgical purposes B.E. 2563 (A.D. 2020). Roy Thai Gov Gaz 2020; 137 (Special Pt 260 ng): 8. (in Thai)

Ngamchokwathana C. Association between low allergenic latex gloves and latex sensitization among nursing staff at tertiary university hospitals in northeastern Thailand. [Master Thesis in Occupational Medicine and Occupational Health]. Khon Kaen: The Graduate School, Khon Kaen University; 2022.

de Groot H, Patiwael JA, de Jong N, Burdorf A, van Wijk RG. Sensibilisatie en allergie voor natuurrubberlatex: onderzoeksresultaten 10 jaar na introductie van een latexprotocol [research into sensitization and allergies to latex: results after 10 years of the use of powder-free latex gloves]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(10):A5835.

Filon LF, Bochdanovits L, Capuzzo C, Cerchi R, Rui F. Ten years incidence of natural rubber latex sensitization and symptoms in a prospective cohort of health care workers using non-powdered latex gloves 2000-2009. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2014;87(5):463-9. doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0885-6

Crippa M, Belleri L, Mistrello G, Carsana T, Neri G, Alessio L. Prevention of latex allergy among health care workers: evaluation of the extractable latex protein content in different types of medical gloves. Am J Ind Med 2003;44(1):24–31. doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10232

Kawahara S, Klinklai W, Kuroda H, Isono Y. Removal of proteins from natural rubber with urea. Polym Adv Technol 2004;15(4):181–4. doi.org/10.1002/pat.465

Rojruthai P, Sakdapipanich J, Wiriyanantawong J, Ho CC, Chaiear N. Effect of latex purification and accelerator types on rubber allergens prevalent in sulphur prevulcanized natural rubber latex: potential application for allergy-free natural rubber gloves. Polymers 2022;14(21):4679. doi.org/10.3390/polym14214679

Palosuo T, Antoniadou I, Gottrup F, Phillips P. Latex medical gloves: time for a reappraisal. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2011;156(3):234–46. doi.org/10.1159/000323892

Latza U, Haamann F, Baur X. Effectiveness of a nationwide interdisciplinary preventive programme for latex allergy. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2005;78(5):394–402. doi.org/10.1007/s00420-004-0594-2

Adisesh A, Robinson E, Nicholson PJ, Sen D, Wilkinson M, Standards of Care Working Group. U.K. standards of care for occupational contact dermatitis and occupational contact urticaria. Br J Dermatol 2013;168(6):1167–75. doi.org/10.1111/bjd.12256

NHS plus, Royal College of Physicians, Faculty of Occupational Medicine. Latex allergy: occupational aspects of management: a national guideline [Internet]. London: Royal College of Physicians of London; 2008 [cited 2023 Feb 25]. Available from: https://www.nhshealthatwork.co.uk/

images/library/files/Clinical%20excellence/Latex_allergy_full_guidelines.pdf.

Kalampakorn S. Occupational health nurses practices in providing occupational health services for health workers. J Med Assoc Thai 2019;102(1):55.

Chaiear N, Seehamoke C, Krisorn P, Soonthornvinit W, Janpho P, Lertruampattana S, et al. Occupational health and safety management system: implementation at the Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 2019;102(1):65.

Occupational Health and Safety Office. Medical surveillance program for medical gloves allergy personnel (OHS-H-P003-10). Khon Kaen: Faculty of Medicine Khon Kaen University; 2020.

Published

2023-04-26

How to Cite

1.
Ngamchokwathana C, Chaiear N. Current Situation of Allergy to Latex Protein in Medical Gloves and Preventive Measures among Health Personnel. SRIMEDJ [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 26 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];38(2):187-96. Available from: https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SRIMEDJ/article/view/258081

Issue

Section

Review Articles