Evaluation of Radiation Dose to the Skin, Eye Lens and Thyroid Gland from Abdominal Computed Tomography (Pilot Study)

Authors

  • Chalermphon Titirith Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
  • Benyapha Khwamman Bachelor of Science Program (Radiological Technology) Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
  • Wiritchaya Oiucharoenkit Bachelor of Science Program (Radiological Technology) Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
  • Tinatcha Puenglert Bachelor of Science Program (Radiological Technology) Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
  • Suthathip Horaploet Bachelor of Science Program (Radiological Technology) Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
  • Petcharakorn Hanpanich Bachelor of Science Program (Radiological Technology) Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University

Keywords:

Abdominal computed tomography, volumetric radiation dose index, dose length product, effective dose value, diagnostic reference levels

Abstract

Background and Objective:  The abdominal examination using computed tomography (CT) is essential for diagnosis of abdominal abnormalities and this trend has gradually increased. Since x-radiation in CT is harmful, the monitoring of patient radiation dose has been concerned. This study aimed to assess the radiation dose from upper abdomen CT, lower abdomen CT and whole abdomen CT examination and compare with national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs). Moreover, the skin radiation, eyes lens and thyroid from these CT examinations were also compared.

Methods:  The study was cross sectional descriptive study divided into 2 groups. Group 1 was a prospective radiation dose assessment in 30 patients who underwent CT examination of upper, lower and whole abdomen and met inclusion criteria during July 2022-March 2023. Group 2 was a radiation dose assessment in phantom study. Radiation dose assessment at eyes, thyroid and abdominal skin were performed using nanoDot optically stimulating luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs). Then, the radiation dose parameters including volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP) and calculated effective dose were recorded.

Results:  For group1, the highest CTDIvol (8.46 mGy), DLP (1,171 mGy·cm) and effective dose (17.5 mSv) were observed from CT whole abdomen examination. These radiation parameters from all CT abdomen examinations were within the NDRLs. The mean radiation dose at eyes lens (0.21±0.06 mGy), thyroid (0.69±0.28 mGy) and abdomen (25.34±7.85 mGy) were observed with highest value from CT whole abdomen examination. For group2, the highest radiation dose measurement was observed at abdominal skin (39.19±2.38 mGy). The radiation dose at right side of abdomen was slightly higher than left side. The radiation dose at left and right thyroid from CT whole abdomen examination was found with the highest value (0.90±0.14, 0.92±0.04 mGy). In addition, the left eye lens dose was obtained with the highest value from CT whole abdomen examination (0.43±0.04 mGy)

Conclusion: CTDIvol and DLP from this study were lower than NDRLs and data of United State of America. The data from this study can be used for alteration CT examination to optimize patient radiation and preserve the image quality for precise diagnosis.

References

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Computed tomography (CT) exams (indicator). [cited August 1, 2023]. https://data.oecd.org/healthcare/computed-tomography-ct-exams.html

Poosiri S, Krisanachinda A, Khamwan K. Evaluation of patient radiation dose and risk of cancer from CT examinations. Radiol Phy Technol 2024;17:176-85. doi:10.1007/s12194-023-00763-w.

Berrington de GA, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004;363(9406):345-51. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15433-0

Vano E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, Rehani MM, Kang K, Rosenstein M, et al. ICRP Publication 135: diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP 2017;46(1):1-44. doi:10.1177/0146645317717209

Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL. U.S. diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology 2017;284(1):120-33. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161911

Department of Medical Sciences Ministry of Public Health. National diagnostic reference levels in Thailand 2021. Bangkok: Beyond Publishing Co., Ltd., 2021.

Pema D, Kritsaneepaiboon S. Radiation dose from computed tomography scanning in patients at Songklanagarind Hospital: diagnostic reference levels. J Health Sci Med Res 2020;38(2):135-43. doi: 10.31584/jhsmr.2020732

Ngaodingam W. Radiation dose in patient underwent computed tomography scan at Sichon Hospital. J Nakornping Hosp 2021;12(2):97-107.

Chokchai B. Assessment of radiation dose from abdominal computed tomography at Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital. Thai J Rad Tech 2023;48(1):110-8.

Sodkokruad P, Asvaphatiboon S, Thanabodeebonsiri J, Tangboonduangit P. Comparision of computed tomography dose index measuring by two detector types of computed tomography simulator. Thai J Rad Tech 2018;43(1):64-8.

Virginia TS, John EA, Raju S, Maria AS, Anchali K, Madan R, et al. Dose reduction in CT while maintaining diagnostic confidence: diagnostic reference levels at routine head, chest and abdominal CT-IAEA-coordinated research project. Radiology 2006;240(3):828-34. doi:10.1148/radiol.2403050993

Kuepitak K, Thananon J, Awikunprasert P, Sangsawang S, Rueangsitrakoon J, Pungkun V, et al. The study of radiation dose and radiation scattering from computed tomography in a model. J Med Health Sci 2019;26(1):19-28.

Nupetch S, Awikunprasert P, Pungkun V. Radiation dose response of Inlight® optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter. Thai J Rad Tech 2018;43(1):36-43.

Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health. National diagnostic reference levels in Thailand 2023. Bangkok: Beyond Publishing Co., Ltd., 2023.

Pimsorn P. Factor affecting size–specific dose estimates in addition to scanning parameters for chest–abdomen–pelvis computed tomography using automatic tube current modulation at Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital. Thai J Rad Tech 2022;47(1):43-54.

llisy-Roberts P, Williams J. Chapter 1-Radiation physics. W.B. Saunders; 2008: 1–21. [cited August 1, 2023]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780702028441500053. doi:10.1016/B978-0-7020-2844-1.50005-3

Mancosu P, Ripamonti D, Veronese I, Cantone MC, Giussani A, Tosi G. Angular dependence of the TL reading of thin alpha Al2O3: C dosemeters exposed to different beta spectra.. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;113(4):359–65. doi:10.1093/rpd/nch476.

Okazaki T, Hayashi H, Takegami K, Okino H, Kimoto N, Maehata I, et al. Fundamental study of nanoDot OSL dosimeters for entrance skin dose measurement in diagnostic x-ray examinations. J Radiat Prot Res 2016;41(3):229–36. doi:10.14407/jrpr.2016.41.3.229

Jursinic PA. Optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters stable response to dose after repeated bleaching. Med Phys 2020;47(7):3191-203. doi:10.1002/mp.14182

Zhuang AH, Olch AJ. A practical method for the reuse of nanoDot OSLDs and predicting sensitivities up to at least 7000 cGy. Med Phys 2020;47(4):1481-8. doi:10.1002/mp.14059

Trinavarat P, Kritsaneepaiboon S, Rongviriyapanich C, Visrutaratna P, Srinakarin J. Radiation dose from CT scanning: can it be reduced? Asian Biomedicine 2011;5(1):13-21. doi:10.5372/1905-7415.0501.002

Nuntue C, Krisanachinda A, Khamwan K. Optimization of a low-dose 320-slice multidetector computed tomography chest protocol using a phantom. Asian Biomedicine 2016;10(3):269-76. doi:10.5372/1905-7415.1003.490

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

1.
Titirith C, Khwamman B, Oiucharoenkit W, Puenglert T, Horaploet S, Hanpanich P. Evaluation of Radiation Dose to the Skin, Eye Lens and Thyroid Gland from Abdominal Computed Tomography (Pilot Study). SRIMEDJ [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 26 [cited 2025 Jan. 2];39(6):669-7. Available from: https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SRIMEDJ/article/view/263649

Issue

Section

Original Articles