A Survey of Radiation Dose Around the X-Rays Room Using Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) Dosimeter
Keywords:
radiation dose, OSL dosimeter, controlled area, supervised areaAbstract
Background and Objective: This study aimed to measure cumulative radiation doses around diagnostic radiology rooms using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters. Diagnostic radiology rooms where X-rays are used require carefully monitoring of both controlled and supervised areas to ensure radiation doses comply with established safety standards for both workers and the public. This study measured cumulative radiation doses across different types of diagnostic radiology rooms to assess exposure levels in these areas.
Methods: A total of 73 locations were monitored, with two dosimeters placed inside light-protective plastic bags at each monitoring point, located in 29 controlled and 44 supervised locations. Dosimeters were attached to various surfaces, including concrete walls, radiation shielding glass, lead doors, and radiation shielding partitions. The study covered six general X-ray rooms, two computed tomography rooms, one fluoroscopy room, one mammography room, and two dental X-ray rooms, with measurements taken over a 98-day period.
Results: In supervised areas, the annual cumulative radiation dose ranged from 0.46 to 2.92 millisieverts, while in controlled areas, it ranged from 0.43 to 8.94 millisieverts. Notably, nine supervised locations were found to have radiation doses exceeding 1 millisievert per year.
Conclusions: Further investigation is warranted to determine the factors contributing to elevated radiation dose levels in these nine locations. It is essential to enhance radiation safety measures and to conduct follow-up dose assessments to maintain compliance with safety thresholds. Regular radiation surveys of diagnostic radiology rooms, including both supervised and controlled areas, should be performed to ensure worker exposure remains within safe limits and to verify the efficacy of room shielding elements such as walls, doors, and radiation barriers.
References
Le Heron J, Padovani R, Smith I, Czarwinski R. Radiation protection of medical staff. Eur J Radiol 2010;76(1):20-3. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.034
Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, Macvittie TJ, et al. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 2012;41(1-2):1-322. doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001
Department of Medical Sciences. Radiation Laboratory Safety Guidebook. Bangkok: Beyond Publishing Co., Ltd.; 2021. [cite August 5, 2024] Available from: https://www3.dmsc.moph.go.th/download/files/dmsc_se_ra.pdf.
Adhikari KP, Jha LN, Galan MP. Status of radiation protection at different hospitals in Nepal. J Med Phys 2012;37(4):240-4. doi:10.4103/0971-6203.103611
Owusu-Banahene J, Darko EO, Charles DF, Maruf A, Hanan I, Amoako G. Scatter radiation dose assessment in the radiology department of cape coast teaching Hospital-Ghana. Open J Radiol 2018;8(4):299-306. doi:10.4236/ojrad.2018.84033
Alomairy NA. Assessment of secondary radiation dose in radiology departments. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 2023;16(4):100726. doi:10.1016/j.jrras.2023.100726
Nagase Landauer L. OSL Dosimeters [cited 2024 Feburary 11]. Available from: https://www.nagase-landauer.co.jp/english/inlight/dosimeters.html.
Sokić A, Perazić LS, Knežević I. Measurement of ambient dose equivalent H*(10) in the surrounding of nuclear facilities in Serbia. RAD Conference Proceedings 2018;3:42-6. doi:10.21175/RadProc.2018.09
Nupetch S, Awikunprasert P, Pungkun V. Radiation dose response of InLight® optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter. Thai J Rad Tech 2018;43(1):36-43.
Ranogajec-Komor M, Thermoluminescence dosimetry-application in environmental monitoring. Radiat Saf Manag 2003;2(1):2-16. doi:10.12950/rsm2002.2.2
Bidemi IA, Daniel FA, Biodun BS. Risk assessment of occupational exposure of workers engaged in radiation practice without monitoring devices. J Adv Med Med Res 2019;30(9):1-6. doi:10.9734/jammr/2019/v30i930233
Belhaj OE, Boukhal H, Chakir EM, Bellahsaouia M, Belhaj S, Sadeq Y, et al. Dose metrology: TLD/OSL dose accuracy and energy response performance. Nucl Eng Technol 2023;55(2):717-24. doi:10.9734/jammr/2019/v30i930233
Lim CS, Lee SB, Jin GH. Performance of optically stimulated luminescence Al2O3 dosimeter for low doses of diagnostic energy X-rays. Appl Radiat Isot 2011;69(10):1486-9. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.06.001
Phaorod J, Wongsanon W, Hanpanich P, Dornsrichan P, Awikunprasert P, Sriwicha J, et al. The measurement radiation doses to the lens of eye and thyroid gland from computed tomography brain scans and radiation dose around in CT scan room: Phantom study. Srinagarind Med J 2020;35(2):153-60.
Nigapruke K. Radiation shielding evaluation of the X-ray room in small private clinics. Bulletin Departm Med Sci 2022;55(4):246-57.
Omojola AD, Omojola FR, Akpochafor MO, Adeneye SO. Shielding assessment in two computed tomography facilities in South-South Nigeria: How safe are the personnel and general public from ionizing radiation? ASEAN J Radiol 2020;21(2):5-27. doi:10.46475/aseanjr.v21i2.89
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Srinagarind Medical Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.