Development of highly sensitive detection for BCR-ABL transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia by droplet digital PCR

Authors

  • Chonthicha Dongngam Mahidol University
  • Takol Chareonsirisuthigul Mahidol University
  • Nittaya Limsuwanachot Mahidol University
  • Budsaba - Rerkamnuaychoke Mahidol University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/tjg.2015.16

Keywords:

BCR-ABL transcripts, complete molecular response (CMR), conventional RQ-PCR, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), minimal residual disease (MRD)

Abstract

BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been the standard treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. It is known that complete molecular response (CMR) is necessarily equated with eradication of the CML clone, until 50% of patients with stable CMR relapse when imatinib (the first-line TKI treatment) is withdrawn. More sensitive assays for minimal residual disease (MRD) are required to identify patients who are more likely to remain in remission without therapy. In order to improve the performance of conventional real-time polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR), it is necessary to consider the factors that limit of detection and specificity of the method. However, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) approaches this problem in a different way. Using nanofluidic technology, the nucleic acid sample is divided into hundreds of individual replicate PCR reactions. We demonstrated a high sensitive method of ddPCR with lower limit of detection using BCR-ABL p210 plasmid and BCR-ABL transcripts from patient sample dilutions, and compared the results with conventional RQ-PCR method. The results from ddPCR showed successful detection of BCR-ABL transcripts in undetectable samples by RQ-PCR, and sensitivity limit by detecting down to 10 copies per microliter. The correlation of measurements between RQ-PCR and ddPCR from plasmid and clinical samples indicated remarkable correlation between both techniques. Moreover, we used ddPCR to investigate MRD in 3 specimens from one CML patient who sustained CMR by conventional RQ-PCR before relapsed. This approach results in more efficient amplification of BCR–ABL transcripts that may provide an accurate measurement of MRD in CML patients with CMR. Application of this approach in prospective samples enrolled in clinical trials will shed light on its role in predicting relapse. We anticipate that the method will be employed in multiple applications in the clinic, including diagnosis, cancer recurrence monitoring, and treatment management.

Author Biographies

Chonthicha Dongngam, Mahidol University

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital

Takol Chareonsirisuthigul, Mahidol University

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital

Nittaya Limsuwanachot, Mahidol University

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital

Budsaba - Rerkamnuaychoke, Mahidol University

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital

References

Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, Hochhaus A, Soverini S, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, Clark RE, Cortes JE, Guilhot F, et al. (2013) European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013. Blood 122: 872-884.

Bhat S, Herrmann J, Armishaw P, Corbisier P, Emslie KR (2009) Single molecule detection in nanofluidic digital array enables accurate measurement of DNA copy number. Anal Bioanal Chem394:457-467.

Branford S, Seymour JF, Grigg A, Arthur C, Rudzki Z, Lynch K, Hughes T (2007) BCR-ABL messenger RNA levels continue to decline in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib for more than 5 years and approximately half of all first-line treated patients have stable undetectable BCR-ABL usingstrict sensitivity criteria. Clin Cancer Res 13: 7080–7085.

Branford S, Fletcher L, Cross NC, Muller MC, Hochhaus A, Kim DW, Radich JP, Saglio G, Pane F, Kamel-Reid S, et al. (2008) Desirable performancecharacteristics for BCR-ABL measurement on an internationalreporting scale to allow consistent interpretation of individualpatient response and comparison of response rates betweenclinical trials. Blood 112:3330-3338.

Bustin SA, Nolan T (2004) Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. J Biomol Tech 15:155-166.

Gabert J, Beillard E, van der Velden VH, Bi W, Grimwade D, Pallisgaard N, Barbany G, Cazzaniga G, Cayuela JM, Cave´ H, et al. (2003) Standardization and quality control studies of 'real-time' quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of fusion gene transcripts for residual disease detection in leukemia - a Europe Against Cancer program. Leukemia 17:2318-2357.

Goh HG, Kim YJ, Kim DW, Kim HJ, Kim SH, Jang SE, Lee J, Kim D, Kim WS, Park SH, et al. (2009) Previous best responses can be re-achieved by resumption after imatinib discontinuation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: implication for intermittent imatinib therapy. Leuk Lymphoma 50:944-951.

Goh HG, Lin M, Fukushima T, Saglio G, Kim D, Choi SY, Kim SH, Lee J, Lee YS, Oh SM, et al. (2011) Sensitive quantitation of minimal residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia using nanofluidic digital polymerase chain reaction assay. Leuk Lymphoma 52:896-904.

Groffen J, Stephenson JR, Heisterkamp N, de Klein A, Bartram CR, Grosveld G. Philadelphia (1984) chromosomal breakpoint are clustered within a limited region, bcr, on chromosome 22. Cell 36: 93–99.

Hayden RT, Gu Z, Ingersoll J, Abdul-Ali D, Shi L, Pounds S, Caliendo AM (2013) Comparison of droplet digital PCR to real-time PCR for quantitative detection of cytomegalovirus. J Clin Microbiol 51: 540-546.

Hindson BJ, Ness KD, Masquelier DA, Belgrader P, Heredia HJ, Makarewicz AJ, Bright IJ, Lucero MY, Hiddessen AL, Legler TC, et al. (2011) High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number. Anal Chem 83: 8604-8610.

Hindson CM, Chevillet JR, Briggs HA, Gallichotte EN, Ruf IK, Hindson BJ, Vessella RL, Tewari M (2013) Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR. Nat Methods 10: 1003-1005.

Hughes TP, Kaeda J, Branford S, Rudzki Z, Hochhaus A, Hensley ML, Gathmann I, Bolton AE, van Hoomissen IC, Goldman JM, et al.(2003) Frequency of major molecular responses to imatinib or interferon alfa plus cytarabine in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 349:1423-1432.

Hughes T, Deininger M, Hochhaus A, Branford S, Radich J, Kaeda J, Baccarani M, Cortes J, Cross NC, Druker BJ, et al. (2006) Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood 108:28-37.

Jennings LJ, George D, Czech J, Yu M, Joseph L (2014) Detection and quantification of BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts by droplet digital PCR. J Mol Diagn 16:174-179.

Kantarjian H, Schiffer C, Jones D, Cortes J (2008) Monitoring the response and course of chronic myeloid leukemia in the modern era of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors: practical advice on the use and interpretation of monitoring methods. Blood 111:1774-1780.

Kuwabara A, Babb A, Ibrahim A, Milojkovic D, Apperley J, Bua M, Reid A, Foroni L, Rezvani K, Goldman J, et al. (2010) Poor outcome after reintroduction of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who interrupt therapy on account of pregnancy without having achieved an optimal response. Blood 116:1014-1006.

Kiselinova M, Pasternak AO, De Spiegelaere W, Vogelaers D, Berkhout B, Vandekerckhove L (2014) Comparison of droplet digital PCR and seminested real-time PCR for quantification of cell-associated HIV-1 RNA. PLoS One 9:e85999.

Mauro MJ, Druker BJ, Maziarz RT (2004) Divergent clinical outcome intwo CML patients who discontinued imatinib therapy afterachieving a molecular remission. Leuk Res 28(Suppl 1):S71-3.

Monya Baker (2012)Digital PCR hits its stride. Nat Methods 9:541-544.

Pinheiro LB, Coleman VA, Hindson CM, Herrmann J, Hindson BJ, Bhat S, Emslie KR(2012) Evaluation of a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction format for DNA copy number quantification. Anal Chem 84:1003-1011

Pornprasert S and Prasing W (2014) Detection of alpha(0)-thalassemia South-East Asian-type deletion by droplet digital PCR. Eur J Haematol 92: 244-248

Ross DM, Watkins DB, Hughes TP, Branford S (2008) Reverse transcription with random pentadecamer primers improves the detection limit of a quantitative PCR assay for BCR-ABL transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia: implications for defining sensitivity in minimal residual disease. Clin Chem 54:1568-1571.

Ross DM, Branford S, Seymour JF, Schwarer AP, Arthur C, Bartley PA, Slader C, Field C, Dang P, Filshie RJ, et al. (2010) Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who maintain a complete molecular response after stopping imatinib treatment have evidence of persistent leukemia by DNA PCR. Leukemia 24:1719-1724.

Rousselot P, Huguet F, Rea D, Legros L, Cayuela JM, Maarek O, Blanchet O, Marit G, Gluckman E, Reiffers J, et al. (2007) Imatinib mesylate discontinuation in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in complete molecular remission for more than 2 years. Blood 109:58-60.

Rowley JD (1973) A new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining (letter). Nature 243:290–293.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-10

Issue

Section

Research Articles