Genetic strategies to accomplish cellulosic ethanol production

Authors

  • Tanathorn Vitisant Biofuels by Biocatalysts Research Unit, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
  • Chompunuch Virunanon Biofuels by Biocatalysts Research Unit, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
  • Warawut Chulalaksananukul Biofuels by Biocatalysts Research Unit, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/tjg.2011.12

Keywords:

biofuels, biomass pretreatment, polysaccharide, bioprocess, biocatalyst

Abstract

Cellulosic ethanol production is one of thefuels which play an important role for human naturein the near future. However, ethanol production atpresent uses sugar feedstock substrate from sugarcane and starch from cassava. These substrates arefood resources for human and animals thus are notappropriate substrates for liquid fuel production. Forthis reason, cellulosic biomass from cellulose andhemicellulose is an alternative option for liquid fuelproduction to overcome competitive problems onfood cultivated area. However, higher cost ofcellulosic ethanol production than petroleum fuels is an important issue that has an impact on liquid fuelmanufacture. In this review, useful strategies forcellulosic ethanol process improvement aredescribed in order to create potent alternative energywith economically and commercially acceptableprofit. The strategies can be divided into three parts:first, production of hydrolysis enzyme by plant;second, pretreatment of biomass by controllinglignin and cellulose property; and third, increasingpolysaccharide amount in biomass for ethanolfermentation. In sumary, all strategies will beenhanced together to access the goal to develop theuse of cellulosic ethanol in the near future.

References

Bao, W. and Renganathan, V. 1992. Cellobiose

oxidase of Phanerochaete chrysosporium

enhances crystalline cellulose degradation by

cellulases. FEBS Lett 302: 77–80.

Blaschke, L., Legrand, M., Mai, C. and Polle, A.

Lignification and structural biomass

production in tobacco with suppressed caffeic/

-hydroxy ferulic acid O-methyl transferase

activity under ambient and elevated CO2

concentrations. Physiol Plant 121: 75–83.

Chen, F. and Dixon, R.A. 2007. Lignin modification

improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel

production. Nature Biotechnol 25: 759–761.

Eriksson, M.E., Israelsson, M., Olsson, O. and

Moritiz, T. 2000. Increased gibberellin

biosynthesis in transgenic trees promotes

growth, biomass production and xylem fiber

length. Nature Biotechnol 18: 784–788.

Fischer, R., Stoger, E., Schillberg, S., Christou, P.

and Twyman, R. 2004. Plant-based production

of biopharmaceuticals. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7

: 152–158.

Mosier, N.S. 2005. Nanoscale, enzyme mimicking

catalysts for bioprocessing agricultural

residues. http://cobweb.ecn.purdue.edu/-lorre/

/presentation/doc/enzyme20%20mimetecmosier%

(as%20presented).pdf (28 February

Oraby, H., Venkatesh, B., Dale, B., Ahmad, R.,

Ransom, C., Oehmke, J. and Sticklen, M.

Enhanced conversion of plant biomass

into glucose using transgenic rice-produced endoglucanase for cellulosic ethanol.

Transgenic Res 16: 739–749.

Perlack, R.D., Wright, L.L., Turholow, A.F. and

Graham, R.L. 2008. Biomass as feedstock for

bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the

technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual

supply. U.S. Department of Energy report:

-59.

Ragauskas, J., Charlotte, K., Williams, B.H.,

Davison, G.B., John, C., Charles, A.E.,

William, J. Frederick, Jr., Jason, P.H., David,

J.L., Charles, L.L., Jonathan, R.M., Richard,

M., Richard, T. and Timothy, T. 2006. The

path forward for biofuels and biomaterials.

Science 311: 484–489.

Ransom, C., Balan, V., Biswas, G., Dale, B.,

Crockett, E. and Sticklen, M. 2007.

Heterologous Acidothermus cellulolyticus 1,4

β-endoglucanase E1 produced within the corn

biomass converts corn stover into glucose.

Appl Biochem Biotechnol 36: 207–220.

Schillberg, S., Fischer, R. and Emans, N. 2003.

Molecular farming of recombinant antibodies

in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci 60: 433–445.

Shoseyov, O., Shani, Z. and Levy, I. 2006.

Carbohydrate binding modules: biochemical

properties and novel applications. Microbiol

Mol Biol Rev 70: 283–295.

Smidansky, E.D., Martin, J.M., Hannah, C.L.,

Fischer, A.M. and Giroux, M.J. 2003. Seed

yield and plant biomass increases in rice are

conferred by deregulation of endosperm

ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Planta 216:

–664.

Srinivasa, R., Fang, C., Gail, S., Lisa, J., Hugh, A.

and Richard, A.D. 2005. Targeted

down-regulation of cytochrome P450 enzymes for forage quality improvement in

alfalfa (Medicago sativa L). Proc Natl Acad

Sci USA 102: 16573–16578.

Sticklen, M.B. 2006. Plant genetic engineering to

improve biomass characteristics for biofuels.

Curr Opin Biotechnol 17: 315–319.

Teymouri, F., Alizadeh, H., Laureano-Perez, L.,

Dale, B.E. and Sticklen, M.B. 2004. Effects of

ammonia fiber explosion treatment on activity

of endoglucanase from Acidothermus

cellulolyticus in transgenic plant. Appl

Biochem Biotechnol. 116: 1183–1192.

Yamamura, Y., Sahin, F.P., Nagatsu, A. and

Mizukami, H. 2003. Molecular cloning and

characterization of a cDNA encoding a

novel apoplastic protein preferentially

expressed in a shikonin-producing callus

strain of Lithospermum erythrorhizon. Plant

Cell Physiol. 44: 437–446.

Ziegler, M.T., Thomas, S.R. and Danna, K.J. 2000.

Accumulation of a thermostable endo-1,4-d

glucanase in the apoplast of Arabidopsis

thaliana leaves. Mol Breeding 6: 37–46.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Review Articles