Main Article Content
Background and Objective: The preterm delivery was dependents on various factors, includes with cervical changes. The study of 2016 and 2018 in Europe and Americas found the cervical length (CL), uterine cervical angle (UCA) and gestational age were predictive factors for preterm delivery. Risk for preterm delivery may varies for difference races. Primary objective was prediction of spontaneous preterm birth with UCA in Northeastern Thailand population.
Methods: A cross sectional study in single pregnancy, age > 18 years with ultrasonographic examination at antenatal care unit, Srinagarind Hospital.
Results: The mean of gestational age, CL, UCA and gestational age at delivery were 20.20±1.30 yr., 3.74±0.67 cm, 93.93±18.75 degree and 38.37±1.84 weeks, respectively. The preterm delivery was associated with UCA< 97 degree. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 57.9%, 54.9%, 14.7% and 90.7%, respectively.
Conclusion: The preterm delivery was associated with UCA<97 degree. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 57.9%, 54.9%, 14.7% and 90.7%, respectively.
2. OECD. Preterm birth and low birth weight 2018 Dec 3; 64–65.
3. Kiatsuda D, Thinkhamrop J, Prasertcharoensuk W. Success rate in preterm uterine contraction inhibition with tocolytic agents in a tertiary care center. Int J Womens Health 2016; 8: 663–667.
4. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no.130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120(4): 964–973.
5. Berghella V. Universal cervical length screening for prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2012; 67(10): 653–657.
6. Practice Bulletin No.171: Management of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128(4): e155.
7. Lim K, Butt K, Crane JM, Morin L, Bly S, Butt K, et al. Ultrasonographic cervical length assessment in predicting preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011; 33(5): 486–499.
8. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, et al. Abnormal labor. In: Williams Obstetrics [Internet]. 25th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018 [cited Feb 15, 2021]. Available from: accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1160775319
9. Myers KM, Feltovich H, Mazza E, Vink J, Bajka M, Wapner RJ, et al. The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy. J Biomech 2015; 48(9): 1511–1523.
10. Sochacki‐Wójcicka N, Wojcicki J, Bomba‐Opon D, Wielgos M. Anterior cervical angle as a new biophysical ultrasound marker for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46(3): 377–378.
11. Farràs Llobet A, Regincós Martí L, Higueras T, Calero Fernández IZ, Gascón Portalés A, Goya Canino MM, et al. The uterocervical angle and its relationship with preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31(14): 1881–1884.
12. Dziadosz M, Bennett TA, Dolin C, West Honart A, Pham A, Lee SS, et al. Uterocervical angle: a novel ultrasound screening tool to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215(3): 376. e1-7.
13. Kitipoonwongwanid K, Soongsatitanon A. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of the uterocervical angle for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 29(2): 112–119.