Comparison of Set-up Errors between Two Different Thermoplastic Masks for Brain Tumors Using Image-Guided Radiation Therapy

Authors

  • Jirapha Keeddee Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University
  • Kronwadee Promsupap Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University
  • Kamonporn Prasertsung Radiological Technology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Khonkaen University
  • Wiwattanee Worawasuwat Cobal Radiological Technology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Khonkaen University

Keywords:

thermoplastic mask, setup error, IGRT, treatment verification

Abstract

Background and Objective: Thermoplastic masks serve as immobilization devices that improve the precision of patient positioning in radiation therapy for brain tumor radiation. In the Radiation Oncology Department of Srinagarind Hospital, two types of short thermoplastic masks are utilized: the U-shape head mask and the S-type head mask. The S-type head mask is compatible with the existing base utilized by the S-type head & shoulder mask within the department. This research were evaluated the differences in radiation setup errors and staff satisfaction associated with two types of masks.

Methods: This retrospective descriptive study involved 41 patients with brain tumors who received brain tumor radiation. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the type of mask. Treatments were delivered by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) from November 2022 to November 2023. Treatment verification was confirmed through image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Total vector errors (TVE) were evaluated using kV orthogonal (kV-kV) and cone beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT). The clinical target volume to planning target volume margin was determined utilizing Van Herk equation. Furthermore, average staff satisfaction scores concerning mask preparation and usage were assessed for both types.

Results: The average setup errors of the two mask types presented no statistically significant differences. The TVE for kV-kV imaging was measured at 0.25 cm for the S-type head mask and 0.24 cm for the U-shape head mask. The TVE for kV-CBCT imaging was measured at 0.07 cm and 0.08 cm, respectively. The CTV to PTV margin was determinded to be less than 0.5 cm, which is within the acceptable limits for treatment planning at Srinagarind Hospital. The average staff satisfaction scores were 3.68 for the U-shape head mask and 3.43 for the S-type head mask.

Conclusion: Both mask types are appropriate for patient positioning in radiation therapy, as their setup errors remain within the established limits of the department. IGRT protocols, such as daily kV-kV and weekly kV-CBCT imaging, must be adhered to rigorously. The U-shape head mask was preferred by the staff over the S-type head mask, which is likely due to their increased familiarity with its application.

References

Boongird A. Brain tumor. Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi hospital, Mahidol University [Internet]. 2014 [cited Oct 15, 2023]. Available from: https://www.rama.mahidol.ac.th/surgery/sites/default/ files/ public/pdf/PDFneuro/4.pdf.

Krusan S. New technologies in radiotherapy. Srinagarind Med J 2011; 26(Suppl):35-42.

Sanghangthum T. Imaging in radiotherapy. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2016 [cited Oct 15, 2024]. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/ index.php/jtaro/ article /view/203076.

Lertbutsayanukul C. IMRT of primary brain tumor. Radiotherapy And Oncology Department of Radi-ology, King Chulalongkorn Hospital [Internet]. 2013 [cited Apr 25, 2024]. Available from: https://www.chulacancer.net/uploads/articles_attc/2023_02/429_attach_1676810790.pdf.

The royal college of radiologists. On target: ensuring geometric accuracy in radiotherapy [Internet]. 2008 [cited Nov 22, 2024]. Available from: https://www.ipem.ac.uk/media/mprf2mcw/on-target-ensuring-geometric-accuracy-in-radiotherapy.pdf

Leitzen C, Wilhelm-Buchstab T, Garbe S, Lütter C, Müdder T, Simon B, et al. Quality of patient posi-tioning during cerebral tomotherapy irradiation using different mask systems. Strahlenther Onkol 2014;190(4):382-5; doi: 10.1007/s00066-013-0496-x.

Van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Seminars in Radiation Oncology 2004;14(1):52–64; doi:10.1053/j.semradonc.2003.10.003.

Potisan P. Likert rating scales. Encyclopedia of education [Internet]. 2004 [cited Nov 22, 2024]. Available from: https://ejournals.swu.ac.th/index.php/ENEDU/article/view/5830/5467

Nguanthean W, Wannahirunkorn R, Kotesombut S, Aunsamoe P, Khayaiwong P. Comparison of posi-tioning error in stereotactic irradiation for brain cancers by using two different thermoplastic masks. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol 2022;28(1): R54–64.

Tong-ngarm W, Yabsantia S. Evaluation of setup errors in patients with head and neck cancer treated with IMRT techniques using electronic portal imaging devices. J Sakon Nakhon Hosp 2021;24(3):1–11

Caruana K, Refalo N, Spiteri D, Couto JG, Zarb F, Bezzina P. PTV margin calculation for head and neck patients treated with VMAT: a systematic literature review. J Radiother Pract 2022;21(4):586–93; doi:10.1017/S1460396921000546.

Kitpanit S. Target delineation in glioblastoma. Radiotherapy and Oncology Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Hospital [Internet]. 2023 [cited Apr 5, 2023]. Available from: https://www.chulacancer.net/uploads/articles_attc/2023_11/849_attach_1699505546.pdf

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

1.
Keeddee J, Promsupap K, Prasertsung K, Worawasuwat Cobal W. Comparison of Set-up Errors between Two Different Thermoplastic Masks for Brain Tumors Using Image-Guided Radiation Therapy. SRIMEDJ [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 26 [cited 2025 Jan. 2];39(6):680-9. Available from: https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SRIMEDJ/article/view/263352

Issue

Section

Original Articles