A Study of Radiation Dose to Staff and Close Contacts from Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Function Assessment Using [99mTc]-labeled Red Blood Cells
Keywords:
radiation exposure, multiple gated acquisition scan, occupational exposureAbstract
Background and objectives: The assessment of cardiac function through the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using the multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) scan technique is recognized for its high accuracy and reproducibility. However, this procedure requires the intravenous administration of a radiopharmaceutical agent, resulting in radiation emission from the patient, which could potentially affect medical personnel. The objective of this study was to quantify the radiation dose from patients undergoing MUGA scans at varying time intervals post-radiopharmaceutical injection and distances from the patient. Additionally, the study sought to estimate the radiation exposure of radiology technologists, radiology assistants, and individuals in close contacts to the patient.
Methods: A prospective descriptive study was conducted on a sample of 20 patients who underwent MUGA scans at the Nuclear Medicine Department of Vajira Hospital. Radiation dose measurements were performed using a survey meter placed at the epigastric level at two time points: immediately after radiopharmaceutical injection and 40 minutes post-injection. Measurements were taken at distances of 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, and 2.00 meters from the patients. The estimated radiation doses received by radiologic technologists, radiology assistants, and individuals in close contact with the patients were subsequently calculated and compared to the radiation dose limits per year recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).
Results: The mean radiation doses emitted from patients immediately after injection at distances of 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, and 2.00 meters were 60.65 ± 16.08, 27.53 ± 4.38, 11.20 ± 1.52 and 3.84 ± 0.89 microSieverts/hour (µSv/hr), respectively. At 40 minutes post-injection, the mean radiation doses decreased to 53.53 ± 16.60, 25.36 ± 4.52, 10.07 ± 1.33 and 3.30 ± 0.57 µSv/hr at distances of 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 and 2.00 meters, respectively. The estimated radiation doses received by radiological technologists, radiology assistants, and individuals in close contacts to the patient at a distance of 0.25 meters were 3.90 ± 3.03, 2.59 ± 1.67, and 38.93 ± 25.08 µSv, respectively.
Conclusion: The findings indicate an inverse relationship between the radiation dose emitted from patients and both distance from the patient and elapsed time post-injection. The radiation doses received by occupational workers and individuals in close proximity to the patients remained below the recommended dose limits established by ICRP.
References
Tanking C. Introduction to cardio-oncology: anthracyclines induced cardiotoxicity. J Chulabhorn Royal Acad 2021;3(2):71-9.
Yang SN, Sun SS, Zhang G, Chou KT, Lo SW, Chiou YR, et al. Left ventricular ejection fraction estimation using mutual information on technetium-99m multiple-gated SPECT scans. Biomed Eng Online 2015;14:119. doi:10.1186/s12938-015-0117-2.
International commission on radiological protection. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication No. 103. New York: Pergamon Press; 2007.
Bartlett ML. Estimated dose from diagnostic nuclear medicine patients to people outside the Nuclear Medicine department. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2013;157(1):44-52. doi:10.1093/rpd/nct119.
Stenstad LI, Pedersen GA, Landmark AD, Brattheim B. Nuclear radiation dose to the surroundings from patients who are undergoing nuclear medicine examinations. Rad Open 2014;1:10-18. doi:10.7577/radopen.1196.
Cheebsumon P. Radiation dose obtained from whole body bone scans. J DMS 2020;45:148-53.
Wisetnan C, Awikunprasert P, Kaewsombat T, Molee P. Radiation emitted from patients undergoing nuclear medicine examination at Udonthani Cancer Hospital. J Assoc Med Sci 2021;54:73-7.
Kim HS, Cho JH, Shin SG, Dong KR, Chung WK, Chung JE. A study on quantitative analysis of exposure dose caused by patient depending on time and distance in nuclear medicine examination. Radiat Eff Defects Solids 2012;168(1):80–7. doi:10.1080/10420150.2012.670859.
Dennis E. Inverse square law applied in radiation [Internet]. 2019 [cited Dec 6, 2024]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331717578_inverse_square_law_applied_in_radiation
Udon Y. Inverse square law and radiation protection [Internet]. [cited Mar 23, 2022]. Available from: http://nkc.tint.or.th/nkc5004/nkc5004k.html
Gültekin SS, Sahmaran T. Importance of bladder radioactivity for radiation safety in nuclear medicine. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2013;22(3):94–7. doi:10.4274/Mirt.18480.
Parihar AS, Chopra S, Prasad V. Nephrotoxicity after radionuclide therapies. Transl Oncol 2022;15(1):101295. doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101295.
Bolch WE, Eckerman KF, Sgouros G, Thomas SR. MIRD pamphlet No. 21: A generalized schema for radiopharmaceutical dosimetry—standardization of nomenclature. J Nucl Med 2009;50(3):477-84. doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.056036.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Srinagarind Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
