A Comparative Study of HbA1c and Fasting Plasma Glucose in Annual Health Check-Up Participants

Authors

  • Jirasak Piyapromdee Internal Medicine Department, Khon Kaen Hospital, Mueang Khon Kaen District, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand 40000
  • Nattakarn Suwansaksri Internal Medicine Department, Khon Kaen Hospital, Mueang Khon Kaen District, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand 40000
  • Manthana Mitchai Clinical Pathology Department, Khon Kaen Hospital, Mueang Khon Kaen District, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand 40000

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64960/srimedj.v41i2.268381

Keywords:

FPG, HbA1c, diagnosis of diabetes, hemoglobinopathies

Abstract

Background and Objective: The number of diabetes patients is escalating worldwide. Currently criterion for diagnosing diabetes used fasting plasma glucose or HbA1c. In Thailand, especially the northeast region had high prevalence of HbE. Hemoglobinopathies affect the immunoassays used for HbA1c measurement. In this study, we evaluate the concordance between HbA1c and FPG criteria in the diagnosis of diabetes and explores the prevalence of hemoglobinopathies that may affect HbA1c interpretation.

Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on Khon Kaen Hospital staff undergoing annual health check-ups between September and December 2018. Total 893 participants were evaluated both FPG and HbA1c. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 6.0 by percentages, means, standard deviations, Pearson Chi-square test, two-tailed tests, and logistic regression.

Results: A total of 893 participants, 57.7% were female, mean ages of 47.6 years, and mean BMI was 24.5 kg/m2. Most participants had no underlying disease (78.5%) and were not taking medication regularly (89.5%). When using FPG criteria, the prevalence of diabetes was 4.6% and prediabetes was 13.2%. There were relatively higher prevalence using HbA1c criteria, with diabetes was 10.1% and prediabetes was 18.0%. However, the correlation between these 2 diagnostic criteria was fair by kappa coefficient of 0.38, 95%CI; 0.35 to 0.40. Prevalence of hemoglobinopathies was 37.8% with high prevalence of homozygous Hb E (3.6%) and Hb E trait (30.2%). Diabetes diagnosis did not differ significantly by hemoglobinopathy status for both FPG (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.67–2.47, p=0.44) and HbA1c (OR 1.61; 95% CI 0.85–3.05, p=0.15) criteria.

Conclusions: HbA1c and FPG showed fair to moderate agreement for diabetes diagnosis, unaffected by hemoglobinopathy status. However, due to the high prevalence of HbE and higher costs, HbA1c is more suitable as a confirmatory test than a screening tool.

References

Duncan BB, Magliano DJ, Boyko EJ. IDF Diabetes Atlas 11th edition 2025: global prevalence and projections for 2050. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2025;41(1):7-9.

Porapakkham Y, Rao C, Pattaraarchachai J, Polprasert W, Vos T, Adair T, et al. Estimated causes of death in Thailand, 2005: implications for health policy. Popul Health Metr 2010;8:14. doi:10.1186/1478-7954-8-14.

Patanavanich R, Aekplakorn W. Thai National Health Examination Survey VII (2024-2025). Nonthaburi: Health Systems Research Institute (HSRI); 2025.

Huang OS, Tay WT, Ong PG, Sabanayagam C, Cheng CY, Tan GS, et al. Prevalence and determinants of undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy and vision-threatening retinopathy in a multiethnic Asian cohort: the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases (SEED) study. Br J Ophthalmol 2015;99(12):1614-21. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306492.

Narayan KM, Chan J, Mohan V. Early identification of type 2 diabetes: policy should be aligned with health systems strengthening. Diabetes Care 2011;34(1):244-6. doi:10.2337/dc10-1952.

Rahbar S, Blumenfeld O, Ranney HM. Studies of an unusual hemoglobin in patients with diabetes mellitus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1969;36(5):838-43. doi:10.1016/0006-291X(69)90685-8.

International Expert Committee. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32(7):1327-34. doi:10.2337/dc09-9033.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*; 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026. Diabetes Care 2026;49 (Supplement_1):S27–S49. doi:10.2337/dc26-S002.

Ho-Pham LT, Nguyen UDT, Tran TX, Nguyen TV. Discordance in the diagnosis of diabetes: Comparison between HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose. PLoS One 2017;12(8):e0182192. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182192.

Little RR, Rohlfing CL, Hanson S, Connolly S, Higgins T, Weykamp CW, et al. Effects of hemoglobin (Hb) E and HbD traits on measurements of glycated Hb (HbA1c) by 23 methods. Clin Chem 2008;54(8):1277-82. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.103580.

Viprakasit V, Lee-Lee C, Chong QT, Lin KH, Khuhapinant A. Iron chelation therapy in the management of thalassemia: the Asian perspectives. Int J Hematol 2009;90(4):435-45. doi:10.1007/s12185-009-0432-0.

Leckngam P. Thalassemia and Hemoglobinopathies in Thailand: A Systematic Review. J Health Sci Altern Med 2023;5(3):18-26.

Yedla N, Kuchay MS, Mithal A. Hemoglobin E disease and glycosylated hemoglobin. Indian J Endocr Metab 2015;19:683-5. doi:10.4103/2230-8210.163211.

Srisurin W. Prevalence and effect of hemoglobin E disorders on Hba1c and lipid profile of diabetic patients at Surin Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2011;94(1):36-42.

Rohlfing C, Hanson S, Weykamp C, Siebelder C, Higgins T, Molinaro R, et al. Effects of hemoglobin C,D,E and S traits on measurements of hemoglobin A1c by twelve methods. Clin Chim Acta 2016;455:80-83. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2016.01.031.

Daniel WW, Cross CL. Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences. 10th edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2013:192.

Diabetes Association of Thailand, Royal College of Physicians of Thailand, Thai Endocrine Society, Department of Medical Services, National Health Security Office. Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes 2023. Bangkok: Srimuang Printing; 2023.

Masuch A, Friedrich N, Roth J, Nauck M, Muller UA, Petersmann A. Preventing misdiagnosis of diabetes in the elderly: age-dependent HbA1c reference intervals derived from two population-based study cohorts. BMC Endocr Disord 2019;19(1):20. doi:10.1186/s12902-019-0338-7.

Darsini D, Hamidah H, Notobroto HB, Cahyono EA. Health risks associated with high waist circumference: A systematic review. J Public Health Res 2020;9(2):1811. doi:10.4081/jphr.2020.1811.

Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Mancillas-Adame LG, Rodríguez-Tamez G, Diaz Gonzalez-Colmenero A, Solis-Pacheco RC, Elizondo-Plazas AS, et al. Hypertriglyceridemia and Its Association with HbA1c Test: A Prospective In Vivo Controlled Study. Int J Endocrinol 2019;2019:4784313. doi:10.1155/2019/4784313.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

1.
Piyapromdee J, Suwansaksri N, Mitchai M. A Comparative Study of HbA1c and Fasting Plasma Glucose in Annual Health Check-Up Participants. SRIMEDJ [internet]. 2026 Apr. 24 [cited 2026 Apr. 26];41(2):153-62. available from: https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SRIMEDJ/article/view/268381

Issue

Section

Original Articles