Prevalence and Risk Factors of Term Singleton Fetal Macrosomia: A Multicenter Case-Control Study
Keywords:
term, risk factor, fetal macrosomia, high birthweightAbstract
Background and Objective: Fetal macrosomia increases the complications that some is life threatening. The cut-off birthweight at over 4,000 gram is commonly used for its diagnosis, however the clinical definition of cut-off value of fetal macrosomia is still debatable and needs more knowledge to determine. This study aimed to study the prevalence, risk factors, outcomes and optimal cut-off value of term singleton high birthweight infants in Thailand.
Methods: A multicenter case - control study was conducted. The subjects were term singleton pregnant women who delivered in Kumphawapi, Udonthani, Nong Han, Ban Phue, Wanonniwat, Ban Dung, Lom Sak, and Ang Thong Hospital between 1 January, 2018 to 31 December, 2023. Data was collected from the hospital’s database and then analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis.
Results: There were 43,129 term singleton infants with 927 term macrosomic (≥ 4,000 grams) infants (2.15%). The risk factors of fetal macrosomia were obese (AOR 2.89, 95%CI 2.16-3.85), diabetes mellitus (AOR 2.90, 95%CI 2.31-3.64), overweight (AOR 2.21, 95%CI 1.74-2.80), excessive gestational weight gain (AOR 1.91, 95%CI 1.54-2.37), multiparity (AOR 1.73, 95%CI 1.39-2.16). Fetal macrosomia increased the risk of shoulder dystocia (AOR 41.17, 95%CI 10.18-166.42), primary cesarean delivery (AOR 3.01, 95%CI 2.47-3.68), and postpartum hemorrhage (AOR 2.81, 95%CI 1.40-5.64). The mean birthweight of term singleton infants was 3,036.59± 498.42 g. The 90th percentile was 3,610 grams that correlated with the composite complication, primary cesarean delivery and postpartum hemorrhage were increased significantly when the birthweight was more than or equal to 3,600 grams when each 100 grams increment of birthweight was analyzed.
Conclusion: On the basis of the 4,000 grams traditional cut-off point, the prevalence of fetal macrosomia was found to be 2.15%. The risk factors of fetal macrosomia were maternal obesity, diabetes mellitus, overweight, and multiparity. However, the new cut-off birthweight at 3,600 grams (90th percentile) for the determination of high birthweight is suggested from this study’s evidence that the risk of shoulder dystocia, primary cesarean delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage were increased significantly in the higher birthweight than this cut-off point. Pregnant women with risk factors who have estimated fetal weight more than or equal to this cut-point should be closely monitored or referred to the higher facility hospital for caring these complications.
References
Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW, Samueloff A. Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing greater than or equal to 4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165(4 Pt 1):831-7. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(91)90424-p
No authors listed. Macrosomia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 216. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135(1):e18-e35. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003606
Choukem SP, Njim T, Atashili J, Hamilton-Shield JP, Mbu R. High birth weight in a suburban hospital in Cameroon: an analysis of the clinical cut-off, prevalence, predictors and adverse outcomes. BMJ Open 2016;6(6):e011517. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011517
Lawoyin TO. A prospective study on some factors which influence the delivery of large babies. J Trop Med Hyg 1993;96(6):352-6.
Koyanagi A, Zhang J, Dagvadorj A, Hirayama F, Shibuya K, Souza JP, et al. Macrosomia in 23 developing countries: an analysis of a multicountry, facility-based, cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2013;381(9865):476-83. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61605-5
Salihu HM, Dongarwar D, King LM, Yusuf KK, Ibrahimi S, Salinas-Miranda AA. Phenotypes of fetal macrosomia and risk of stillbirth among term deliveries over the previous four decades. Birth 2020;47(2):202-10. doi:10.1111/birt.12479
Ju H, Chadha Y, Donovan T, O'Rourke P. Fetal macrosomia and pregnancy outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49(5):504-9. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01052.x
Esakoff TF, Cheng YW, Sparks TN, Caughey AB. The association between birthweight 4,000 g or greater and perinatal outcomes in patients with and without gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200(6):672.e1-4. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.035
Das S, Irigoyen M, Patterson MB, Salvador A, Schutzman DL. Neonatal outcomes of macrosomic births in diabetic and non-diabetic women. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94(6):F419-22. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.156026
Siggelkow W, Boehm D, Skala C, Grosslercher M, Schmidt M, Koelbl H. The influence of macrosomia on the duration of labor, the mode of delivery and intrapartum complications. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008;278(6):547-53. doi:10.1007/s00404-008-0630-7
Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Buttarelli M, Franchi M, Durig P, et al. Perinatal outcome of fetuses with a birth weight greater than 4,500 g: an analysis of 3356 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;109(2):160-5. doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00045-9
Bjørstad AR, Irgens-Hansen K, Daltveit AK, Irgens LM. Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89(5):664-9. doi:10.3109/00016341003686099
King JR, Korst LM, Miller DA, Ouzounian JG. Increased composite maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with ultrasonographically suspected fetal macrosomia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25(10):1953-9. doi:10.3109/14767058.2012.674990
Duryea EL, Hawkins JS, McIntire DD, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. A revised birth weight reference for the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124(1):16-22. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000345
Borisut P, Kovavisarach E. Standard intrauterine growth curve of Thai neonates delivered at Rajavithi hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2014;97(8):798-803.
Buck Louis GM, Grewal J, Albert PS, Sciscione A, Wing DA, Grobman W, et al. Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213(4):449.e1-449.e41. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.032
Wardlaw TM. Low birthweight: country, regional and global estimates. Unicef; 2004.
Rueangjaroen P TK. macrosomia. 26 November, 2024. [cited Nov 26, 2024]. Available from: https://w1.med.cmu.ac.th/obgyn/lecturestopics/topic-review/6721/
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin: Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists Number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108(4):1039-47.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Shoulder Dystocia (Green-top Guideline No. 42). 26 November, 2024. [cited Nov 26, 2024]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/green-top-guidelines/shoulder-dystocia-green-top-guideline-no-42/
Rasmussen KM, Catalano PM, Yaktine AL. New guidelines for weight gain during pregnancy: what obstetrician/gynecologists should know. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009;21(6):521-6. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e328332d24e
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: Final Data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018;67(8):1-50.
Ehrenberg HM, Mercer BM, Catalano PM. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191(3):964-8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.052
Yang S, Zhou A, Xiong C, Yang R, Bassig BA, Hu R. et al. Parental Body Mass Index, Gestational Weight Gain, and Risk of Macrosomia: a Population-Based Case-Control Study in China. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2015;29(5):462-71. doi:10.1111/ppe.12213
Jaovisidha A, Suthutvoravut S, Taneepanichskul S, Herabutya Y. Maternal Factors Associated with Fetal Macrosomia. Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1999;11(1):11-5.
Pongcharoen T, Gowachirapant S, Wecharak P, Sangket N, Winichagoon P. Pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain in Thai pregnant women as risks for low birth weight and macrosomia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2016;25(4):810-7. doi:10.6133/apjcn.092015.41
Beta J, Khan N, Khalil A, Fiolna M, Ramadan G, Akolekar R. Maternal and neonatal complications of fetal macrosomia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54(3):308-18. doi:10.1002/uog.20279
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Srinagarind Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
