Estimating Parameters in Autoregressive Process During Rolling Periods

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Mar 30, 2018
Keywords:
Autoregressive process, Estimating parameters, Least squares, Yule-Walker.

Main Article Content

Phongsaphen Jantana*
Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kasersart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Prapaisri Sudasna-na-Ayudthya
Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kasersart University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Abstract

There are many techniques used to estimate autoregressive (AR) model parameters, but they have disadvantages such as high calculation times and errors. This study compared operation times and prediction mean square error during rolling periods between two different methods. One was the least squares (LS) method, and the other was the Yule-Walker (YW) method. After the linear system equations were obtained by the least squares method, they were solved and updated using invertibility method. The other linear system equations were obtained by the Yule-Walker method and they were solved using Durbin-Levinson Recursion and invertibility method. The study showed that the first method is the preferred technique for long rolling periods because it has less calculation time and it has same prediction mean square error.


Keywords: Autoregressive process, Estimating parameters, Least squares, Yule-Walker.


Corresponding author: E-mail: g4585017@ku.ac.th and fengpsa@ku.ac.th  

Article Details

How to Cite
Jantana*, P., & Sudasna-na-Ayudthya, P. (2018). Estimating Parameters in Autoregressive Process During Rolling Periods. CURRENT APPLIED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 6(2a), 424–433. retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cast/article/view/147958
Issue
Vol. 6 No. 2a (2006)
Section
Original Research Articles

Copyright Agreement Statement

The corresponding author has to submit Copyright Agreement form after the article is accepted for publication in order to warrant that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.

 

The author(s) grant Current Applied Science and Technology a non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive the article in print and electronic form with effect if and when the article is accepted for publication. In the event that the article is withdrawn prior to acceptance or is declined, this agreement shall have no effect, and no party shall be bound by it.

 

The author(s) retain copyright of this article, including but not limited to the right to reproduce and distribute the article, to include it in a thesis or book, and to post it on an institutional or personal repository, provided that the original publication in Current Applied Science and Technology is properly cited.

 

 

 

References

[1] Box, G.P., Jenkins, G.M., and Reisel, G.C. 1994 Time Series Analysis Forecasting and Control. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
[2] Golub, G.H., and Van Lone, C.F. 1996 Matrix Computations. London, The Johns Hopkins Press.
[3] Hannan E.J., Krishaiah, P.R. and Rao, M.M. 1995 Time Series in Time Domain, Elsevier Science B.V., Netherlands.
[4] Janacek, G. and Swift, L. 1993 Time Series Forecasting, Simulation, Applications, West Sussex, Ellis Horwood Limited.
[5] Montgomery, D.C., Johnson, L.A. and Gardiner, J.S. 1990 Forecasting and Time Series Analysis. Singapore, McGraw-Hillm Inc.
[6] Zioutas, G., Camariopoulos, L. and Bora Senta, E. 1997 Robust autoregressive estimates using quadratic programming. European Journal of Operational Research 101 (1977). Elservier Science.
[7] www.http://www.google.co.th/search?q=autoregressive
[8] www.http://www.stat.wharton.upenn.edu/~steele/Carses/956/ResourceDetails/YuleWalker And more.html