Treatment of Coal Fly Ash for Cation Exchange Capacity Improvement
Main Article Content
Abstract
Previously, utilizations of coal fly ash as an absorbent for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater have not been successful because of its low cation exchange capacity (CEC). Many attempts have been made to improve the properties of fly ash. In this study we refluxed coal fly ash with 1.0 M NaOH for 24 hrs. As a result, the CEC of the treated fly ash increased by a factor of 24 to almost 200 meq/100 g compared to untreated fly ash. Porosity and crystallization of the treated fly ash also increased and it was converted into zeolite Na-P and sodalite octahydrate. The concentration of Na2O in treated fly ash was 6 times higher than in untreated fly ash.
Keywords: adsorbent, CEC, trated fly ash, heavy metals, zeolite
Corresponding author: E-mail: kcsuwan@kmitl.ac.th
Article Details
Copyright Agreement Statement
The corresponding author has to submit Copyright Agreement form after the article is accepted for publication in order to warrant that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
The author(s) grant Current Applied Science and Technology a non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive the article in print and electronic form with effect if and when the article is accepted for publication. In the event that the article is withdrawn prior to acceptance or is declined, this agreement shall have no effect, and no party shall be bound by it.
The author(s) retain copyright of this article, including but not limited to the right to reproduce and distribute the article, to include it in a thesis or book, and to post it on an institutional or personal repository, provided that the original publication in Current Applied Science and Technology is properly cited.
References
[2] Carlson, C.L.; Adriano, D.C. J. Environ.Sci.Tech. 1993, 22, 227-247.
[3] Chatveera, B.; Nimityongskul, P. J. EGAT. 1994, 5, 36-42.
[4] Vinichnantaratana, S. J. EGAT. 1996, 5, 54-57.
[5] Koogkamhang, S. J. EGAT. 1994, 3, 11-27.
[6] Faust, S.D.; Aly, O.M. Adsorption Processes for Water Treatment. USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1987.
[7] Pandy, K.K.; Prasad, G.; Singh, V.N. Water Res. 1985, 19, 869-873.
[8] De, A.K.; Lal, M.M. J. Eviron. Sci. Health. 1990, A25, 665-677.
[9] Weng, C.H.; Huang, C.P. J. Environ. Eng. 1994, 120, 1470-1487.
[10] Henmi, T. Soli Sci. Plant Nutr. 1987, 33, 517-521.
[11] Holler, H.; Wirsching, U. Natural Zeolite: Occurrence, Properties, Use; Sand, L.B. and Mumpton, F.A. Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, England, 1978.
[12] Ming, D.W.; Lofgren, G.E. Soil Micromorphology: A Basic and Applied Science. Developments in Soil Science 19; Douglas, L.A., Ed.; Elsevier Publishers: Amsterdam, 1990.
[13] Singer, A.; Berkgaut, V. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 1748-1753.
[14] Davis, M.E.; Lobo, R.F. Chem. Mater. 1992, 4, 756-768.
[15] Black, C.A. Methods of Soil Analysis Part II; American Society of Agronomy Monograph No.9 Medison, Wisconsin, U.S.A. 1965.
[16] Breck, D.W. Zeolite Molecular Sieves; Wiley-Interscience Publishers; New York, 1974.