Comparative Study on Group Sequential Procedure

Main Article Content

Hideyuki Douke

Abstract

The group sequential procedures have used to reduce the average sample size and to terminate early the decision in the repeated significance test for comparing the efficacy between two measurements. The group sequential procedure is characterized by the group sequential design based on the repeated confidence boundaries for realizing the test. In this study we compare the representative methods to construct the repeated confidence boundaries in the group sequential procedure in terms of the average sample size in the simulation studies.


Keywords:  average sample size, some group sequential procedures, repeated confidence boundaries, simulation study


Corresponding author: E-mail: cast@kmitl.ac.th

Article Details

Section
Original Research Articles

References

[1] Armitage, P., McPherson, C.K. & Rowe, B. C. (1969). Repeated Significance Tests on Accumulating data, J.R. Statist. Soc. A. 132, 235-244.
[2] DeMets, D. L. and Ware, J. H. (1980). Group Sequential Methods for Clinical Trials with a One-sided Hypothesis, Biometrika 67, 3, 651-660.
[3] Fleming, T. R., Harrington, D. P. and O’ Brien, P. C. (1984). Designs for Group Sequential Tests, Controlled Clinical Trials 5, 348-361.
[4] Lan, K.K.G. & DeMets, D.L. (1983). Discrete Sequential Boundaries for Clinical Trials, Biometrika 70, 659-663.
[5] O’ Brien, P.C. & Fleming, T. R. (1979). A Multiple Testing Procedure for Clinical Trials, Biometrics 35, 549-556.
[6] Pocock, S. J. (1977). Group Sequential Methods in the Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials, Biometrika 64, 191-199.
[7] Whitehead, J. (1983) : The Design and Analysis of Sequential Clinical Trials, Chichester, Ellis Horwood.