Weigthed Design Optimality Criteria for Spherical Response Surface Designs

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Nov 12, 2018
Keywords:
design optimality criteria, spherical response surface design, reduced models

Main Article Content

Boonorm Chomtee
Department of Statistics, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
John J. Borkowski
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montana State University, USA.

Abstract

In this paper, D. A, G, and IV optimality criteria are developed by using prior probability assignments to model effects. Hence, one and three center point for response surface designs for three design variables (K = 3) in a spherical design region are considered over sets of reduced models for weak and strong heredity. These two specific classes of reduced models are formed by removing terms based on hierarchical structures. The spherical response surface designs are central composite design (CCDs), Box-Behnken design (BBDs), small composite design (SCDs), uniform shell design (UNFSDs), and hybrid 310, 311A, 311B designs. The results of weak and strong heredity models provide reliable interpolation estimates of weighted optimality criterion values for other choices of p1, p1, p2, and pq


Keywords:  design optimality criteria, spherical response surface design, reduced models


Corresponding author: E-mail: fsciboc@ku.ac.th , jobo@math.montana.edu


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Chomtee, B., & Borkowski, J. J. (2018). Weigthed Design Optimality Criteria for Spherical Response Surface Designs. CURRENT APPLIED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 5(1), 226–238. retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cast/article/view/160760
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2005)
Section
Original Research Articles

Copyright Agreement Statement

The corresponding author has to submit Copyright Agreement form after the article is accepted for publication in order to warrant that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.

 

The author(s) grant Current Applied Science and Technology a non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive the article in print and electronic form with effect if and when the article is accepted for publication. In the event that the article is withdrawn prior to acceptance or is declined, this agreement shall have no effect, and no party shall be bound by it.

 

The author(s) retain copyright of this article, including but not limited to the right to reproduce and distribute the article, to include it in a thesis or book, and to post it on an institutional or personal repository, provided that the original publication in Current Applied Science and Technology is properly cited.

 

 

 

References

[1] Chipman, Hugh A. 1996 Bayesian Variable Selection with Related Predictors, The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 24, 17-36.
[2] Borkowski, John J., 2002 Using Prior Probabilities to Calculate Weighted Design Optimality Criteria for Response Surface Designs in the Hypercube, Technical Report, 08-08-02.
[3] Chipman, Hugh A. and Hamada, Michael S. 1996 Discussion: Factor-Based or Effect-Based Modelingg? Implication for Design, Technometrics, 38, 317-320.
[4] Borkowski, John J. and Valeroso, Elsie S. 2001 Comparison of Design Optimality Criteria of Reduced Models for Response Surface Designs in the Hypercube, Technometrics, 43, 468-477.