Prediction of Tuber Peeling Rate Based on Classical Particle Removal Theories

Main Article Content

Adeshina Fadeyibi*
Rasheed Amao Busari
Olusola Faith Ajao


Classical particulate modeling is a mathematical approach that is suitable for describing the behavior of a processing machine because of its ability to accommodate varying degrees of technical parameters. This research was carried out to predict the peeling rate of an existing multi-tuber peeling machine using classical particle removal theories. The machine was designed to peel fresh cassava, sweet potatoes, and cocoyam tubers at a speed range of 350-750 rpm using a selection gear system. The tuber peeling rate were determined over 1-h of machine operation at intervals of 5 min. The classical Weibull and Jennings models, formulated for removing impurities from the outer surface of solids, were used to constitute the models for predicting the peeling rate and the amount of tuber peels removed. The machine was rerun for another 30 min, and the values of the peeling rates and the amount of peels removed were computed and used for the independent validation of the resulting models. Results show a log increase in the peeling rate of the machine with an increase in the residence time and the speed of the machine operation (p< 0.05).  Also, the Weibull model parameters were better estimator of the peeling rate with R2 > 95% and Mean Square Error less than 10%, irrespective of the speed and the residence time of machine operation. Therefore, the models can be used for predicting the peeling rate of the machine within its operating speed limits.


Keywords: classical particle removal theory; multi-tuber peeling machine; peeling rate; Weibull model; Jennings model

*Corresponding author: Tel.: (+234) 7034867681



Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Research Articles


[1] Ohwovoriole, E.N., Obi, S. and Mgbeke, A.C.C., 1988. Studies and preliminary design for a cassava tuber peeling machine. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 31(2), 380-385.
[2] Fadeyibi, A. and Ajao, O.F., 2020. Design and performance evaluation of a multi-tuber peeling machine. AgriEngineering, 2 (1), 55-71.
[3] Ale, M.O. and Manuwa, S.I., 2020. Design and fabrication of a semi-automatic cassava planter. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 445(1), 10.1088/1755-1315/445/1/012002
[4] Kumar, G.P., Khobragade, C.B., Gupta, R.K. and Raza, K., 2019. Development and performance evaluation of an electric motor-powered ginger washing-cum-peeling machine. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(2), 722-737.
[5] Alli, O.D. and Abolarin, M.S., 2019. Design modification of a cassava attrition peeling machine. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1378(3),
[6] Tobiloba, O., Oluwaseun, K. and Leramo, R.O., 2019, December. Performance of cassava peeling machines in Nigeria: A review of literature. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1378 (1),
[7] Samuel, O.C. and Emmanuel, I., 2019. Design of a modernized cassava peeling machine. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 4(10), 1-10.
[8] Edeh, J.C., Nwankwojike, B.N. and Abam, F., 2020. Design modification and comparative analysis of cassava attrition peeling machine. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, 51(1), 63- 69.
[9] Ezekwe, G.O., 1976. A feature for achieving a constant depth of peel in the mechanical peeling of cassava. Nigerian Journal of Engineering, 1(3), 174-181.
[10] Picket, L.K. and West, N.L., 1988. Agricultural machinery-functional elements-threshing, separating and cleaning. In: R.H. Brown, 1st ed. Handbook of Engineering in Agriculture. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 65-85.
[11] Ali, N.M., Muhammad, S.S., Salim, F. and Majid, A.A., 2019. Design and development of potato processing machine. Politeknik and Kolej Komuniti Journal of Engineering and Technology, 1(1), 121-130.
[12] Adetan, D.A., Adekoya, L.O. and Aluko, O.B., 2006. Theory of a mechanical method of peeling cassava tubers with knives. International Agrophysics, 20(4), 269-274.
[13] Seth, O., 2020. A review on the performance of some cassava peeling machines developed. North American Academic and Research Journal, 3(2), 97-162.
[14] Olukunle, O.J. and Akinnuli, B.O., 2013. Theory of an automated cassava peeling system. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT), 2(8), 177-184.
[15] Asonye, G.U., Asoegwu, S.N., Maduako, J.N. and Madubuike, C.N., 2019. A mathematical model for predicting the cutting energy of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta). Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment, 15(1), 174-189.
[16] Mohammed, I.K., Charalambides, M.N. and Kinloch, A.J., 2016. Modeling the effect of rate and geometry on peeling and tack of pressure-sensitive adhesives. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 233(1), 85-94.
[17] Aguirre, R. and Garray, A.E., 1999. Continuous flowing portable separator for cleaning and upgrading beans seeds and grains. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Latin America and Africa, 30(1), 59-63.
[18] Calabria, R. and Pulcini, G., 2000. Inference and test in modelling the failure/repair process of repairable mechanical equipment. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 67(1), 41-53.
[19] Murthy, D.P., Xie, M. and Jiang, R., 2004. Weibull Models. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
[20] Bjarnason, H. and Hougaard, P., 2000. Fisher information for two gamma frailty bivariate Weibull models. Lifetime Data Analysis, 6(1), 59-71.
[21] Costa, A.F.B. and Rahim, M.A., 2000. Economic design of X and R charts under Weibull Shock Models. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 16(1), 143-156.
[22] Davison, A.C. and Louzada-Neto, F., 2000. Inference for the Poly-Weibull Model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society-Series D: The Statistician, 49(1), 189-196.
[23] Ogunlowo, A.S. and Adesuyi, S.A., 1999. A low-cost rice cleaning and destoning machine. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, 30(1), 20-24.
[24] Dürr, H. and Graßhoff, A., 1999. Milk heat exchanger cleaning: modelling of deposit removal. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 77(2), 114-118.
[25] Simonyan, K.J., Yiljep, Y.D. and Mudiare, O.J., 2006. Modeling the grain cleaning process of a stationary sorghum thresher. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 8(1), 1-17.
[26] Dasman, A., Arifin, N.S., Kasim, A.R.M. and Yacob, N.A., 2019. Formulation of dusty micropolar fluid mathematical model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1366(1), https://
[27] Zhang, H., Xu, Y., Gan, Y., Chang, Z., Schlangen, E. and Šavija, B., 2020. Microstructure informed micromechanical modelling of hydrated cement paste: Techniques and challenges. Construction and Building Materials, 25(1), mat.2020.118983
[28] Rothaug, S., Wacker, P., Yin, W. and Kutzbach, H.D., 2003. Capacity increase of cleaning units by circular oscillation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Crop Harvesting and Processing, Kentucky, Michigan, USA, February 9-11, 2003, 109-118.
[29] Ferraz, A.C.O., Mittal, G.S., Bilanski, W.K. and Abdullah, H.A., 2007. Mathematical modeling of laser-based potato cutting and peeling. Bio Systems, 90 (3), 602-613.
[30] Simonyan, J.K. and Yiljep, D.Y., 2008. Investigating grain separation and cleaning efficiency distribution of a conventional stationary Rasp-Bar sorghum thresher. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 10(1), 1-13.
[31] Peng, Z., Wang, C., Chen, L. and Chen, S., 2014. Peeling behavior of a Viscoelastic thin film on a rigid substrate. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 51(25-26), 4596-4603.
[32] Liu, Y.H., Maruyama, H. and Matsusaka, S., 2011. Effect of particle impact on surface cleaning using dry ice jet. Aerosol Science and Technology, 45(12), 1519-1527.
[33] Benyahia, L., Verdier, C. and Piau, J.M., 1997. The mechanisms of peeling of uncross-linked pressure sensitive adhesives. The Journal of Adhesion, 62(1-4), 45-73.
[34] Du, J., Lindeman, D.D. and Yarusso, D.J., 2004. Modeling the peel performance of pressure-sensitive adhesives. The Journal of Adhesion, 80(7), 601-612.
[35] Marin, G. and Derail, C., 2006. Rheology and adherence of pressure-sensitive adhesives. The Journal of Adhesion, 82(5), 469-485.
[36] Xu, D.B., Hui, C.Y. and Kramer, E.J., 1992. Interface fracture and Viscoelastic deformation in Finite size specimens. Journal of Applied Physics, 72(8), 3305-3316.
[37] Zhou, M., Tian, Y., Pesika, N., Zeng, H., Wan, J., Meng, Y. and Wen, S., 2011. The extended peel zone model: Effect of peeling velocity. The Journal of Adhesion, 87(11), 1045-1058.
[38] Kutzbach, H.D., 2003. Approaches for mathematical modeling of grain separation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Crop Harvesting and Processing, Kentucky, Michigan, USA, February 9-11, 2003, 121-130.