Factors Influencing Students’ Behavioral Intention on Using Mobile Learning (M-Learning) in Tourism and Hospitality Major in Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Technology has rapidly improved and become a crucial tool for education. It provides both new content and opportunities that learners could employ for learning, especially mobile learning. To get an effective adoption and operation of new technology, it is imperative to understand factors influencing student’s intentions to use it. The paper presents student behavioral intentions on using mobile learning among university students in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, by adopting the extended technology acceptance model (TAM). A quantitative method was employed using a survey with a 5-Point-Likert scale. Questionnaires were administered to 420 students majoring in Tourism and Hospitality in Cambodia through a stratified sampling method, with the return rate of 98.33 percent. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to analyze the relationship between the proposed determinants of the research model by employing AMOS. The results illustrate that self-efficacy, personal innovativeness, perceived enjoyment, and social influence have significant effects on the perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness towards students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning in the proposed model. Based on these results, some recommendations for implications and further research have been proposed.
Keywords: behavioral intention; mobile learning; tourism; hospitality
*Corresponding author: Tel.: (+66) 081 999 5858
E-mail: [email protected]
Article Details
Copyright Transfer Statement
The copyright of this article is transferred to Current Applied Science and Technology journal with effect if and when the article is accepted for publication. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The author warrants that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
Here is the link for download: Copyright transfer form.pdf
References
Nimbus, 2011. Impact of Technology on Human Life. [online] Available at: https://www.tcetmumbai.in/E-Magazines/nimbus8.pdf.
Bukharaev, N. and Altaher, A.W., 2017. Mobile Learning education has become more accessible. American Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 5(2), doi.org/10.21767/2349-3917.1000005.
Setiawan, W.A., 2018. Differences of education systems in developed and developing countries curriculum, educators and financing in Indonesia and Finland. Didaktika Religia, 6(1), 139-152.
Schwab, K., 2017. The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018. [online] Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR20172018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2017%E2%80%932018.pdf.
ADB, 2019. Cambodia's Growth Remains Strong, Skills Gap Needs Bridging-ADB. [online] Available at: https://www.adb.org/news/cambodias-growth-remains-strong-skills-gap-needs-bridging-adb.
ODC, 2018. Education and Training. [online] Available at: https://opendevelopment cambodia.net/topics/ education-and-training/.
Richardson, J.W., 2008. ICT in education reform in Cambodia: Problems, politics, and policies impacting implementation. Information Technologies & International Development, 4(4), 67-82.
Vuth, D., Than, C.C., Phanousith, S., Phissamay, P. and Tai, T.T., 2007. Distance education policy and public awareness in Cambodia, Laos, and Viet Nam. Distance Education, 28(2), 163-177.
Chan, S., 2018. Number of Internet Users up This Year. [online] Available at: https://www.khmertimeskh.com/557066/number-of-internet-users-up-this-year/.
MoEYS, 2018. Policy and Strategy on Information and Communication Technology in Education. [online] Available at: http://www.moeys.gov.kh/ index.php/en/policies-and-strategies/3018.html#.XzZW7-gzY2w.
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D., 1996. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
Ali, H., Ahmed, A.A., Tariq, T.G. and Safdar, H., 2013. Second Life (SL) in Education: the intensions to use at University of Bahrain. 2013 Fourth International Conference on e-Learning “Best Practices in Management, Design and Development of e-Courses: Standards of Excellence and Creativity”, Manama, Bahrain, May 7-9, 2013, pp. 205-215.
Calisir, F., Altin Gumussoy, C., Bayraktaroglu, A.E. and Karaali, D., 2014. Predicting the intention to use a web‐based learning system: Perceived content quality, anxiety, perceived system quality, image, and the technology acceptance model. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 24(5), 515-531.
Walczuch, R., Lemmink, J. and Streukens, S., 2007. The effect of service employees’ technology readiness on technology acceptance. Information & Management, 44(2), 206-215.
Jackson, J.D., Mun, Y.Y. and Park, J.S., 2013. An empirical test of three mediation models for the relationship between personal innovativeness and user acceptance of technology. Information & Management, 50(4), 154-161.
Richardson, J.W., 2011. Challenges of adopting the use of technology in less developed countries: The case of Cambodia. Comparative Education Review, 55(1), 008-029.
Phin, R., 2021. Will E-learning Replace Face-to-Face Learning? [online] Available at: https://cefcambodia.com/2021/01/02/will-e-learning-replace-face-to-face-learning/.
Davis, F.D., 1985. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
Jennings, D.F. and Seaman, S.L., 1977. Aggressiveness of response to new business opportunities following deregulation: An empirical study of established financial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 177- 189.
Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, Attitude, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Al-Ammari, J. and Hamad, S., 2008. Factors influencing the adoption of e-learning at UOB. Proceedings of the 2008 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT’ 2008), Zarqa, Jordan, December 15-18, 2008, 2008, pp. 1-10.
Al-Ammary, J.H., Al-Sherooqi, A.K. and Al-Sherooqi, H.K., 2014. The acceptance of social networking as a learning tool at University of Bahrain. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(2), 208-214.
Al-Gahtani, S.S., 2016. Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 12(1), 27-50.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D., 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Chang, C.-T., Hajiyev, J. and Su, C.-R., 2017. Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers and Education, 111(1), 128-143.
Hsia, J.-W. and Tseng, A.-H., 2008. An enhanced technology acceptance model for e-learning systems in high-tech companies in Taiwan: Analyzed by structural equation modeling. Proceedings of 2008 International Conference on Cyber Worlds, Hangzhou, China, September 22-24, 2008, pp. 39-44.
Park, Y., Son, H. and Kim, C., 2012. Investigating the determinants of construction professionals' acceptance of web-based training: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Automation in Construction, 22, 377-386.
Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G., 2000. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.
Purnomo, S.H. and Lee, Y.-H., 2013. E-learning adoption in the banking workplace in Indonesia: an empirical study. Information Development, 29(2), 138-153.
Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J., 1998. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215.
De Smet, C., Bourgonjon, J., De Wever, B., Schellens, T. and Valcke, M., 2012. Researching instructional use and the technology acceptation of learning management systems by secondary school teachers. Computers and Education, 58(2), 688-696.
Ally, M. and Gardiner, M., 2012. Application and device characteristics as drivers for smart mobile device adoption and productivity. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 17(4), 35-47.
Agudo-Peregrina, Á.F., Hernández-García, Á. and Pascual-Miguel, F.J., 2014. Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: Differences between higher education and lifelong learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 301-314.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, F. and Davis, G., 2003a. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
Li, Y., Duan, Y., Fu, Z. and Alford, P., 2012. An empirical study on behavioural intention to reuse e‐learning systems in rural China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 933-948.
Phatthana, W.M. and Mat, N.K.N., 2011. The application of technology acceptance model (TAM) on health tourism e-purchase intention predictors in Thailand. Proceeding of 2010 International Conference on Business and Economics Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, November 26-28, 2010, pp. 196-199.
Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D., 2017. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage publications.
Green, S.B., 1991. How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499-510.
Kline, R.B., 1998. Software review: Software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16(4), 343-364.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. and Anderson, R., 2013. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th international ed. Harlow: Pearson.
Ministry of Tourism, 2017. Tourism & Hospitality Educational Centers Based on ASEAN Qualification Standard 2017. Cambodia: Ministry of Tourism, Cambodia.
Tajudeen, S.A., Basha, M.K., Michael, F.O. and Mukthar, A.L., 2013. Determinant of mobile devices acceptance for learning among students in developing country. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(3), 17-29.
Rovinelli, R.J. and Hambleton, R.K., 1977. On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 2(2), 49-60.
Pallant, J., 2013. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide Analysis Using SPSS Program. 6th ed. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
Arbuckle, J.L., 2012. IBM SPSS Amos 21 Users Guide. Chicago: IBM Software Group.
Stanley, J.C., 1957. Psychometric methods. [Review of the book Psychometric Methods (2nd. ed.), by J. P. Guilford]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 48(8), 552-553.
Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D.F. and Summers, G.F., 1977. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8, 84-136.
Byrne, B.M., 2016. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
Byrne, B.M., 2013. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Taylor& Francis Group.
Lee, P., 2006. Understanding and critiquing quantitative research papers. Nursing Times, 102(28), 28-30.
Kline, R.B., 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Yoon, Y., 2002. Development of a Structural Model for Tourism Destination Competitiveness from Stakeholders’ Perspectives. Ph.D. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Chang, C.-T., Hajiyev, J. and Su, C.-R., 2017. Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers and Education, 111(1), 128-143.
Yuen, A.H. and Ma, W.W., 2008. Exploring teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229-243.
Ifinedo, P., 2006. Acceptance and continuance intention of web‐based learning technologies (WLT) use among university students in a Baltic country. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 23(1), 1-20.
Shih, Y.-Y. and Huang, S.-S., 2009. The actual usage of ERP systems: An extended technology acceptance perspective. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 41(3), 263-276.
Przybylski, A.K., Deci, E.L., Rigby, C.S. and Ryan, R.M., 2014. Competence-impeding electronic games and players’ aggressive feelings, thoughts, and behaviors. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 106(3), 441-457.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V. and Crawford, A., 2002. Internet paradox revisited. Journal of social issues, 58(1), 49-74.
Lu, J., Yao, J.E. and Yu, C.-S., 2005. Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245-268.
Turan, A., Tunç, A.Ö. and Zehir, C., 2015. A theoretical model proposal: Personal innovativeness and user involvement as antecedents of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210(2015), 43-51.
Zare, H. and Yazdanparast, S., 2013. The causal model of effective factors on intention to use of information technology among payam noor and traditional universities students. Life Science Journal, 10(2), 46-50.
Teo, T. and Noyes, J., 2011. An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1645-1653.
Farahat, T., 2012. Applying the technology acceptance model to online learning in the Egyptian universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 95-104.
Sarosa, S., 2019. The role of brand reputation and perceived enjoyment in accepting compulsory device’s usage: Extending UTAUT. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 115-122.