An Integrated Factor Analysis-Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution for Location Decision in ASEAN Region: A Case Study of Thai Fabric Manufacturing Plant
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this paper, we propose an integrated model for selecting a suitable location for fabric manufacturing plants in the ASEAN region. In the first phase, Cambodia, Vietnam and Indonesia were determined as candidate locations for evaluation from the screening process. In this regard, key criteria influencing location decisions were derived using factor analysis of responses extracted from questionnaires. In the second phase, criterion weights were calculated using the rank of centroid (ROC) method. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was then used to prioritize three location alternatives, and sensitivity analysis was also employed to verify the stability of the method. Based on TOPSIS method, Vietnam was the preferred location, followed by Indonesia while Cambodia was not recommended. Sensitivity analysis also showed that the proposed model was valid. The findings from this study provided references for enterprises engaged in international location decision making. The results can help them better understand the decision-making process and identify key criteria that can influence location decisions internationally.
Keywords: exploratory factor analysis; location selection; TOPSIS; fabric manufacturing plant; ROC; sensitivity analysis
*Corresponding author: Tel.: (+669)-675-0621, Fax: (+662)-329-8426
E-mail: walailaknoi@gmail.com
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement
The copyright of this article is transferred to Current Applied Science and Technology journal with effect if and when the article is accepted for publication. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The author warrants that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
Here is the link for download: Copyright transfer form.pdf
References
Christopher, M., 2005. Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Creating Value-adding Networks. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Ministry of Industry, 2021. Report on the Industrial Economic Status in Q4/2020 and Outlook in Q1/2021. [online] Available at: http://www.oie.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/monthly_report/Q4_2020andOutlookQ1_2021_en.pdf.
The Nation Thailand, 2021. Textile, Garment Industry Suffers Badly from Contagion Crisis. [online] Available at: https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30385993.
Nidhiprabha, B., 2017. The Rise and Fall of Thailand’s Export-Oriented Industries. Asian Economic Papers, 16(3), 128-150, DOI: 10.1162/ASEP_a_00556.
Franco, C., Rentocchini, F. and Marzetti, G.V., 2008. Why do Firms Invest Abroad? An Analysis of the Motives Underlying Foreign Direct Investments. [online] Available at: https://www.etsg.org/ETSG2008/Papers/Franco.pdf.
Grover, R., Rao, V.B. and Kejriwal, K., 2016. Supplier selection using sustainable criteria in sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Social, Behavioral Education, Economic, Business and Industrial. Engineering, 10(5), 1775-1779.
Chou, T.-Y., Hsu, C.-L. and Chen, M.-C., 2008. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for international tourist hotels location selection. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(2), 293-301.
Lobo, V.B., Ansari, N., Alengadam, B.B., Gharat, P., Jacob, E. and Mishra, P., 2016. Location selection for a company using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 5, 189-196.
Hazarika, R. and Saikia, A., 2020. Landfill site suitability analysis using AHP for solid waste management in the Guwahati Metropolitan Area India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13 (21), 10-27, DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-06156-2.
Aydin, N. and Seker, S., 2021. Determining the location of isolation hospitals for COVID-19 via Delphi-based MCDM method. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36, 3011-3034.
Petrović, I. and Kankaraš, M., 2018. DEMATEL-AHP multi-criteria decision-making model for the selection and evaluation of criteria for selecting an aircraft for the protection of air traffic. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(2), 93-110, DOI: 10.31181/dmame1802091p.
Mihajlović, J., Rajković, P., Petrović, G., and Ćirić, D. 2019. The selection of the logistics distribution center location based on MCDM methodology in Southern and Eastern region in Serbia. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(2), 72-85.
Miç, P. and Antmen, Z.F., 2019.A healthcare facility location selection problem with Fuzzy TOPSIS method for a regional hospital. European Journal of Science and Technology, 16, 750-757.
MacCarthy, B. and Atthirwaong, W., 2003. Factors affecting location decisions in international operations- a Delphi study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23(7),794-818.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. and Tatham, R., 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Thailand Textile Institute, 2009. The number of Textile and Garment Companies (January-December, 2009). [online] Available at: https://www.thaitextile.org/th/insign/detail.1574.1.0.html.
Yamane, T., 1973. Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.
Kline, P., 1994. An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. New York: Routledge.
Keeney R.L. and Raiffa, H., 1993. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Cambridge.
Ertay, T., Ruan, D. and Tuzkaya, U.R., 2006. Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems. Information Sciences, 176(3), 237-262.
Youngkong, S., Baltussen, R., Tantivess, S. and Mohara, A., 2012. Multicriteria decision analysis for including health interventions in the universal health coverage benefit package in Thailand. Value in Health, 15, 961-970.
Bigaret, S., Hodgett, R.E., Meyer, P., Mironova, T. and Olteanu, A.L., 2017. Supporting the multi-criteria decision aiding process: R and the MCDA package. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 5(1-4), 169-194.
Jassbi, J.J., Ribeiro, R.A. and Varela, L.R., 2014. Dynamic MCDM with future knowledge for supplier selection. Journal of Decision Systems, 23(3), 232-248.
Martín-Gamboa, M., Dias, L.C., Quinteiro, P., Freire, F. Arroja, L. and Dias, A.C., 2019. Multi-criteria and life cycle assessment of wood-based bioenergy alternatives for residential heating: A sustainability analysis. Energies. 12, DOI: 10.3390/en12224391.
Amin, M.A., Das, A., Roy, S. and Shikdar, M.I., 2019. Warehouse selection problem solution by using proper MCDM process. International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis, 5(2), 43-45.
Atthirawong, W., 2020. Application of TOPSIS method to green supplier selection for a Thai OTOP producer. Current Applied Science and Technology, 20(1), 144-155.
Yeh, C.H., 2002. A problem-based selection of multiattribute decision-making methods. International Transactions in Operational Research, 9(2), 169-181.
Roszkowska, E., 2013. Rank ordering criteria weighting methods-A comparative overview. Optimum Studia Ekonomiczne, 5(65), 14-33.
Morais, D.C. and Almeida, A.T., 2007. Group decision-making for leakage management strategy of water network. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52, 441-459.
Barron, F.H., 1992. Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights. Acta Psychologica, 80, 91-103.
Erdoğmus, Ş., Aras, H. and Koç E., 2006. Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10, 269-279.
Hwang, C.L.and Yoon, K.P., 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications: A State-of-the Art Survey. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Pavić, Z. and Novoselac, V., 2013. Notes on TOPSIS method. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 1(2), 5-12.
Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R. and Jafarian, A., 2013. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345-354.
Łatuszyńska, A., 2014. Multiple-criteria decision analysis using Topsis method for interval data in research into the level of information society development. Folia Oeconomica Stetin, 13(2), 63-76.
Olson, D.L., 2004. Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 40(7), 721-727.
Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S.K., Yazdani, M. and Ignatius, J., 2012. A state-of-the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert System with Applications, 39, 13051-13069.
Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S. and Jalaliyoon, N., 2014. Exploratory factor analysis; concepts and theory. Advances in Applied and Pure Mathematics, 27, 375-382.
Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S., 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics.5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Simanaviciene, R. and Ustinovichius, L., 2010.Sensitivity analysis for multiple criteria decision making methods: TOPSIS and SAW. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(6), 7743-7744.
Cevikcan, E., Cebi, S. and Kaya, I., 2009. Fuzzy VIKOR and fuzzy axiomatic design versus to fuzzy TOPSIS: An application of candidate assessment. Journal Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing, 15(2-3), 181-208.
Aiginger, K., Bärenthaler-Sieber, S. and Vogel, J., 2015. Competitiveness under New Perspectives. Vienna: WWW for Europe Project.
Porter, M.E., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
Karimi, M.S., Yusop, Z. and Law, S.H., 2009. Location Decision for Foreign Direct Investment in ASEAN Countries: A TOPSIS Approach. [online] Available at: https://mpra. ub.uni-muenchen.de/15000/.
Serhat, B. and Harun, S., 2011.Analyzing the dependency between national logistics performance and competitiveness: Which logistics competence is core for national strategy? Journal of Competitiveness, 4, 4-22.
Banomyong, R., 2010. Benchmarking economic corridors logistics performance: a GMS border crossing observation. World Customs Journal, 4(1), 29-38.
Banomyong, R., Thai, V.V. and Yuena, K.F., 2015. Assessing the national logistics system of Vietnam. The Asian Journal Shipping and Logistics, 31, 21-58.
The World Bank, 2021. Vietnam’s Economy is Forecast to Grow by About 4.8 Percent in 2021. [online] Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/ news/press-release/2021.
Vietnam Briefing, 2020. Seizing Investment Opportunities in Vietnam’s Garment and Textile Industry. [online] Available at: https://www.vietnam-briefing.com/news/seizing-investment-opportunities-vietnams-textile-garment-industry.html/.
An, R., 2020. Vietnam’s Southern Key Economic Region: Opportunities for Investment. [online] Available at: http://www.vietnam-briefing.com/news/vietnams-southern-key-economic-region-opportunities-for-investment.html.
Asian News, 2021. Textile and Garment Industry of Indonesia; More than Just Clothes, but Challenges Persist. [online] Available at: https://asiannews.in/2021/05/15/textile-and-garment-industry-of-indonesia-more-than-just-clothes-but-challenges-persist/.
Market Research Report, 2019. Indonesia Textiles Industry - Growth, Trends and Forecast (2019-2024). [online] Available at: https://www.giiresearch.com/report/moi850253-indonesia-textiles-industry-growth-trends-forecast.html.
Asian Briefing, 2020. Indonesia’s Textile and Garment Industry: Opportunities for Foreign Investors. [online] Available at: https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/indonesias-textile-garment-industry-opportunities-foreign-investors/.
Surianta, A., 2021. Indonesia’s False Choice between Investment and Innovation. [online] Available at: https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2021/06/15/indonesias-false-choice-between-investment-and-innovation/.
Hermawan, I., 2011. Analysis of the impact of macroeconomic policies on textile industry and its products in Indonesia. Bulletin of Monetary, Economics and Banking, 13(4), 357-390.
Nith, K., 2019. Cambodian Place in the International Trade of Textile and Clothing: Threat and Opportunity. [online] Available at: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/94378/.
Hutt, D., 2019. Why Hun Sen Can’t Keep the Lights on, Asia Times. [online] Available at: https://www.asiatimes.com/2019/04/article/why-hun-sen-cant-keep-the-lights-on.
Windt, K., Iber, M. and Klein, J., 2010. Grooving factory-ottleneck control in production logistics through auditory display. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Auditory Display, Washington, D.C., USA, June 9-15, 2010, pp. 115-120.