Nanotoxicity Prediction Based on Half Maximal Effective Concentration (EC50) Values Using Elastic Net Regression and k-Nearest Neighbors
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study focuses on predicting the toxicity of nanoparticles using their half maximal effective concentration (EC50) values through Elastic Net Regression (ENET) and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) models. A dataset of 5,926 samples with 10 descriptors was used to develop Nano - Quantitative structure - activity relationship (Nano-QSAR) models. The kNN model with demonstrated the best performance, achieving an of 91.66%, RMSE of 0.79, and MAE of 0.34 on the training set, and an of 91.58%, RMSE of 0.79, and MAE of 0.32 on the test set, indicating strong predictive ability and good generalization to new data. The ENET model, however, showed substantially lower accuracy with performance measures below 60%, suggesting it was not suitable for this dataset. Key descriptors associated with electronegativity and atomic properties were identified as major contributors to toxicity. These findings highlight the potential of kNN as an effective approach for predicting nanoparticle toxicity and supporting the development of safer nanomaterials.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement
The copyright of this article is transferred to Current Applied Science and Technology journal with effect if and when the article is accepted for publication. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The author warrants that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
Here is the link for download: Copyright transfer form.pdf
References
Ahadian, S., & Radisic, M. (2017). Nanotoxicity. In M. Razavi, & A. Thakor (Eds.). Nanobiomaterials science, development and evaluation (pp. 233-248). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100963-5.00012-4
Armarego, W. L. F. (2022). Nanomaterials. In Purification of laboratory chemicals. Part 2 Inorganic chemicals, catalysts, biochemicals, physiologically active chemicals, nanomaterials (9th ed., pp. 586-630). Butterworth-Heinemann.
AshaRani, P., Mun, G. L. K., Hande, M. P., & Valiyaveettil, S. (2009). Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human cells. ACS Nano, 3(2), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn800596w
Baig, N., Kammakakam, I., & Falath, W. (2021). Nanomaterials: A review of synthesis methods, properties, recent progress, and challenges. Materials Advances, 2(6), 1821-1871. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MA00807A
Beaudrie, C. E. (2011). Using expert judgement for risk assessment. In A. Aschberger & C. E. Beaudrie (Eds.). Assessing nanoparticles risks to human health (pp. 109-138). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4377-7863-2.00005-4
Boehmke, B., & Greenwell, B. M. (2019). Hands-on machine learning with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Concu, R., Kleandrova, V. V., Speck-Planche, A., & Cordeiro, M. N. (2017). Probing the toxicity of nanoparticles: A unified in silico machine learning model based on perturbation theory. Nanotoxicology, 11(7), 891-906. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2017.1379567
Cunningham, P., & Delany, S. J. (2007). k Nearest Neighbour Classifiers. Technical Report UCD CSI 2007 3. https://researchrepository.ucd.ie/server/api/core/bitstreams/2de9257f-8a20-4b34-89f0-020a0183c7b5/content
Erkekoglu, P., & Kocer-Gumusel, B. (2018). Toxicity assessment of nanopharmaceuticals. In A. M. Grumezescu (Ed.), Inorganic frameworks as smart nanomedicines (pp. 565-603). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-04156-6
Frick, H., Chow, F., Kuhn, M., Mahoney, M., Silge, J., Wickham, H., & Posit PBC. (2023, August 8). rsample: Part of the tidymodels framework. https://rsample.tidymodels.org
Gajanan, K., & Tijare, S. (2018). Applications of nanomaterials. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(1), 1093-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.187
Gholamy, A., Kreinovich, V., & Kosheleva, O. (2018). Why 70/30 or 80/20 relation between training and testing sets: A pedagogical explanation. International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics, 11(2), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.6148/IJITAS.201806_11(2).0003
Hansch, C., Maloney, P. P., Fujita, T., & Muir, R. M. (1962). Correlation of biological activity of phenoxyacetic acids with Hammett substituent constants and partition coefficients. Nature, 194, 178-180. https://doi.org/10.1038/194178b0
Kou, L., Bhutia, Y. D., Yao, Q., He, Z., Sun, J., & Ganapathy, V. (2018). Transporter-guided delivery of nanoparticles to improve drug permeation across cellular barriers and drug exposure to selective cell types. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, Article 27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00027
Kuhn, M. (2008). Building predictive models in R using the caret package. Journal of Statistical Software, 28(5), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v028.i05
Kuhn, M., Wickham, H., Hvitfeldt, E., Posit Software, & Posit PBC. (2024, February 18). Preprocessing and feature engineering steps for modeling. https://recipes.tidymodels.org
Li, J., Wang, C., Yue, L., Chen, F., Cao, X., & Wang, Z. (2022). Nano-QSAR modeling for predicting the cytotoxicity of metallic and metal oxide nanoparticles: A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 243, Article 113955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113955
Misra, R., Acharya, S., & Sahoo, S. K. (2010). Cancer nanotechnology: Application of nanotechnology in cancer therapy. Drug Discovery Today, 15(19-20), 842-850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2010.08.006
OECD. (2014). Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative) structure-activity relationship [(Q)SAR] models (OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 69). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085442-en
Pedersen, T. L. (2025). patchwork: The composer of plots (R package version 1.3.2.9000). https://patchwork.data-imaginist.com
Phanus-umporn, C., Shoombuatong, W., Prachayasittikul, V., Anuwongcharoen, N., & Nantasenamat, C. (2018). Privileged substructures for anti-sickling activity via cheminformatic analysis. RSC Advances, 8(11), 5920-5935. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA12079F
Puzyn, T., Leszczynska, D., & Leszczynski, J. (2009). Toward the development of “Nano-QSARs”: Advances and challenges. Small, 5(22), 2494-2509. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200900179
Puzyn, T., Rasulev, B., Gajewicz, A., Hu, X., Dasari, T. P., Toropov, A., & Leszczynska, D. (2011). Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. Nature Nanotechnology, 6(3), 175-178. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.10
Roco, M. C., Williams, R. S., & Alivisatos, P., National Science and Technology Council, & Committee on Technology, Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology. (1999). Nanotechnology research directions: IWGN workshop report. IWGN.
Wen, Y., Lin, W., Mettenbrink, E. M., DeAngelis, P. L., & Wilhelm, S. (2021). Nanoparticle toxicology. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 61, 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-032320-110338
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T. L., Miller, E., Bache, S. M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D. P., Spinu, V., Takahashi, K., … Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the Tidyverse. The Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), Article 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 67(2), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x
