Systematic Literature Review: Assessment of Patients with Critical Illness and Nursing Outcomes
Keywords:
Systematic review, Assessment of Patients with Critical Illness, Nursing OutcomesAbstract
The systematic literature review is aimed to summarize the know-how of assessment of patients with critical illness and nursing outcomes. According to the research reports during 2011-2021 by using guidelines for systematic literature review of Joanna Briggs Institute (2016) and result of systematic retrieval, it was found that there were totally 8 research papers which passed the selection criteria, including 1 experimental research, 2 quasi-experimental researches, 4 observational researches, and 1 descriptive research. The research tools were the form of assessment of research quality and the form of data extraction. The Researcher used the content analysis and summary. According to the result of systematic literature review and assessment of modified early warning sign, it was found that with the scoring result of 1-2 points, there was the highest survival chance of 85.5%. According to the assessment of quick sepsis organ failure, it was found that with the scoring result of 2 points or above, the death rate within and outside CCU could be predicted. According to the use of the form of scoring assessment of APACHE II and APACHE III, it was found that the death rate of patients was lower than the death rate under the criteria of APACHE II at the same scoring level, with statistical significance (p < 0.001) and according to the result of use of the form of assessment of patients with critical illness under the nursing concept of FANCAS in nursing students, it was found that nursing students had the knowledge and abilities to use the form of assessment of patients with critical illness, created from FANCAS patterns, at the intermediate level (X = 3.38, S.D. = .741). This systematic literature review will be useful for medial personnel’s application in assessment of patients for better nursing outcomes.
References
Banchongchad1, S., Ongprakrit1, J., & Jaleanlap, P. (2022). Effect of using Nakornping Early Warning Score (NEWS) to surveillance for variations change and warning signs for patients in male surgical department 1 Nakornping Hospital, Chiang Mai Province. Journal of Nursing and Public Health Research, 2(1), 47-59.
Chuaychang, S. (2018). Effects of using the assessment of the modified early warning signs (MEWS) in the assessment and monitoring change symptom of patients in cardiac catheterization lab, Trang hospital. Thai Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Nursin, 29(1), 72-83.
Chumsri, J. (2020). Nursing care of patietnts with burn and inhalation injury: 2 case study. Journal of Khon Kaen Provincial Health Office, 2(2), 248-264.
Holloway, N.M. (1988). Nursing the Critically III Adult (3rd ed). California: Addison-Wesley.
Kaewpeth, U. (2021). The effectiveness of the Modified Early Warning Scores (MEWS) for Surveillance of patients before entering crisis inpatients department Sikhio Hospital Nakornratchasima Province. Region 11 Medical Journal, 35(1), 1-11.
Kaewsingha, P., Akavipat, P., Prasertsong, K., & Pannak, S. (2012). Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit ffective outcomes measurement with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III. Medical Journal of Srisaket Surin Burirum Hospital, 27(3), 205-216.
Khwannimit, B., & Geater, A. (2007). A Comparison of APACHE II and SAPS II Scoring Systems in Predicting Hospital Mortality in Thai Adult Intensive Care Units. Journal of the Medical Association Thailand, 90(4), 643-652.
Maitra, S., Som, A., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2018). Accuracyc of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis observational study. Clinical Microbiology and infection, 24(11), 1123-1129.
Nakchuay, N., Inprasong, L., Tuntrakul, W., Tongbai, P., & Juntanu, P. (2017). MEWS: Adult Pre-Arrest Sign and Roles of Nurse. Siriraj Medical Bulletin, 10(3), 186-190.
Onsawadipong, P. (2020). The effects of modified sequential organ failure assessment compared with modified early warning score in sepsis patients at Intensive Care Unit. Journal of Nursing Division, 47(2), 88-103.
Pothidara, Y., & Thanyasawad, T. (2020). Effects of using a critically ill patients’ assessment from according to FANCAS concept in nursing practicum course. Nursing Journal, 47(2), 463-475.
Rhodes, A., Evan, LE., ALhazzani, W., Levy, MM., Antonelli, M., Ferrer, R., ... Dellinger, R.P. (2017). (a). Surviving sepsis campaign: international guideline for management of sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Medicine, 43(3), 304-337.
Rhodes, A., Evan, LE., ALhazzani, W., Levy, MM., Antonelli, M., Ferrer, R., ... Dellinger, R.P. (2017). (b). Surviving sepsis campaign: international guideline for management of sepsis and septic shock. Critical Care Medicine, 45(3), 486-552.
Ritklar, L. (2016). The Results of using the evaluation form for early warning signs on unplanned ICU admission and mortality rate in internal medicine ward at Thammasat University Hospital. TUH Journal online, 1(1), 5-12.
Saleh, A., Ahmed, M., Sultan, I., & Abdel-lateif, A. (2015). Comparison of the mortality prediction of different ICU scoring systems (APACHE II and III, SAPSII, and SOFA) in a single-center ICU Subpopulation with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis, 64, 1-6.
Suttichan, K., Phithaksilp, M., Prueksaritanond, S., & Jaidee, W. (2018). Outcome of quick Sequential (Sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment criteria compare with Chachoengsao’s Sepsis Screening criteria in patient with infection at Bangpakong hospital. Burapha Journal of Medicine, 5(1), 13-27.
The Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence Based Nursing & Midwifery. (2016). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual: 2016 edition. Retrieved August 29, 2021 from http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au/Documents/sumari/Reviewers%20Manual-2016 Pdf
The Joanna Briggs Institute. (2020). (a). Critical Appraisal Tool Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials. Retrieved August 29, 2021 from https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
The Joanna Briggs Institute. (2020). (b). Critical Appraisal Tool Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies. Retrieved August 29, 2021 from https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
The Joanna Briggs Institute. (2020). (c). Critical Appraisal Tool Checklist for Analytical Cross-sectional Studies. Retrieved August 29, 2021 from https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
Thompson, K., Venkatesh, B., & Finfer, S. (2019). Sepsis and septic shock: Current app roachesto management. Internal Medicine Journal, 49, 160-170.
Tunanuchittikul, Y. (2014). Application of APACHE II scores in the General Intensive Care Unit, Lampang Hospital. Journal of Health Science, 23(2), 1-7.
William, A. K., Elizabeth, A. D., Douglas, P. W., & Jack, E. Z. (1985). APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Critical Care Medicine, 13, 818-29.
Zhou, X., Ben, S., Chen, H., & Ni, S. (2015). A comparison of APACHE II and CPIS scores for the prediction of 30-daymortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. International Journal of Infectious Disease, 30, 144-147.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Princess of Naradhiwas University Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
