Infill Structure Analysis of 17-4 PH Materials Extrusion Additive Manufacturing based on Finite Element Method

Authors

  • Kaweewat Worasaen Department of Information and Production Technology Management (IPTM), College of Industrial Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangsue, Bangkok 10800, Thailand.
  • Pasut Promsuwan Department of Manufacturing and Service Industry Management, Faculty of Business and Industrial Development, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangsue, Bangkok 10800, Thailand.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65411/rst.2026.265687

Keywords:

Digital manufacturing, Additive manufacturing, Infill structure design, Finite element method

Abstract

This study evaluates the mechanical performance of 17-4 precipitation-hardened (PH) stainless steel components fabricated via material extrusion additive manufacturing (MEAM), with a focus on the role of the infill structure. Finite element method (FEM) simulations and tensile testing were used to analyze how different infill patterns and densities affect structural integrity. The results show that increasing infill density improves mechanical strength and load distribution, reducing stress concentrations that lead to failure. A 30% infill density was identified as an effective balance between strength and material efficiency, making it suitable for high-pressure applications. However, this choice may limit weight reduction and material savings compared to lower infill densities. These findings highlight the importance of infill optimization in enhancing the reliability and cost-effectiveness of MEAM-produced 17-4 PH components for engineering use.

References

Andreacola, F.R., Capasso, I., Pilotti, L. and Brando, G. 2021. Influence of 3D-printing parameters on the mechanical properties of 17-4PH stainless steel produced through selective laser melting. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 15(58): 282-295.

Buchanan, C. and Gardner, L. 2019. Metal 3D printing in construction: A review of methods, research, applications, opportunities and challenges. Additive Manufacturing 28: 704-718.

Carneiro, L., Jalalahmadi, B., Ashtekar, A. and Jiang, Y. 2019. Cyclic deformation and fatigue behavior of additively manufactured 17-4PH stainless steel. International Journal of Fatigue 123: 22-30.

Chou, T.H. and Hong, C.Y. 2013. Effects of infill density on mechanical properties of 3D-printed PLA parts. Journal of Mechanical Engineering 45(3): 279-284.

Han, D., Zhang, W., Li, P. and Fan, H. 2020. Numerical investigation of stiffness and buckling response of simple and optimized infill structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 61(6): 2629-2639.

Jones, J., Vafadar, A. and Hashemi, R. 2023. A review of the mechanical properties of 17-4PH stainless steel produced by bound powder extrusion. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 7(5): 162.

Kumar, A. and Kumar, R. 2022. Additive manufacturing of optimized connecting rods for enhanced performance. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 122(5): 3057-3070.

Lee, M.K., Lee, H., Lee, T.S. and Jang, H. 2019. Design of high duty diesel engine connecting rod based on finite element analysis. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 41: 2796-2803.

Smith, J. and Ritchie, M. 2021. Additive manufacturing infill optimization for automotive 3D-printed ABS components. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 114(6): 4207-4218.

Sun, Q., Wang, Y. and Zhang, X. 2018. Effect of solution temperature on the microstructure and properties of 17-4PH high-strength steel samples formed by selective laser melting. Metals 8(10): 1-14.

Thompson, S.M., Bian, L., Shamsaei, N. and Yadollahi, A. 2015. An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; Part II: Mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control. Additive Manufacturing 8: 36-62.

Wegner, K., Meboldt, K., Klahn, R. and Breitenstein, E. 2018. Additive manufacturing of metallic materials in the context of industry 4.0. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 14(4): 1866-1873.

Witek, L. and Zelek, P. 2019. Stress and failure analysis of the connecting rod of diesel engine. Engineering Failure Analysis 97: 374-382.

Wu, W., Geng, P., Li, G., Zhao, D., Zhang, H. and Zhao, J. 2015. Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS. Materials 8(10): 5834-5846.

Yoo, Y., Lee, J. and Kim, T. 2006. Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy subjected to solution and aging treatments. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 176(1-3): 162-169.

Zhang, S., Yang, F., Li, P., Bian, Y., Zhao, J. and Fan, H. 2022. A topologically gradient body-centered lattice design with enhanced stiffness and energy absorption properties. Engineering Structures 263: 114-384.

Zhang, W., Li, G., Wang, X. and Zhang, H. 2017. An improved prediction of residual stresses and distortion in additive manufacturing. Computational Materials Science 126: 360-372.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Worasaen, K., & Promsuwan, P. (2025). Infill Structure Analysis of 17-4 PH Materials Extrusion Additive Manufacturing based on Finite Element Method. Recent Science and Technology, 18(1), 265687. https://doi.org/10.65411/rst.2026.265687

Issue

Section

Research Article