Efficacy of Shoebox Spectrophotometer Program Working on Smartphone to Measure Absorbance for Soil Phosphorus Analysis by Molybdenum Blue Colorimetric Method

Authors

  • Nuttakorn Intaravicha Faculty of Science and Technology, Pathumwan Institute of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/thaidoa-agres.2020.11

Keywords:

Shoebox spectrophotometer, smartphone, soilphosphorusanalysis, Molybdenum Blue colorimetric method

Abstract

This trial compared an efficacy of handmade spectrophotometer using Shoebox Spectrophotometer program working on smartphone and standard spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Model UV2600) for absorbance measurement in soil phosphorus analysis by Molybdenum Blue colorimetric method. The standard phosphorus solution at concentration levels ranging from 0-1.0 mg/L was analyzed by Molybdenum Blue colorimetric method and measured the absorbance by a handmade and a standard spectrophotometer. Results showed simple linear regression with coefficient of determination (R2) at 0.997 and 0.998, respectively. The absorbance values given by a handmade spectrophotometer (x) were lower than those of standard spectrophotometer (y), but there was relationship in a positive linear correlation manner with high correlation coefficient at R = 0.998, and linear equation of y = 2.48x – 0.006. Available phosphorus in the soil was analyzed in five soil series; Bang Len, Nong Kae, Yang Talat, Khao Yoi and Lop Buri, by Molybdenum Blue colorimetric method and measured absorbance by a handmade (x) and a standard spectrophotometer (y). The results showed that there was relationship in a positive linear correlation with high correlation coefficient at R = 0.997 and linear equation of y = 0.649x + 3.787.

References

พัชรี ธีรจินดาขจร. 2554. คู่มือการวิเคราะห์ดินทางเคมี. โรงพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น, พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 3. 269 หน้า.
ยงยุทธ โอสถสภา. 2543. ธาตุอาหารพืช. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1. มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ กรุงเทพฯ.
Abdu N. 2006. Soil - phosphorus extraction methodologies: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 1 (5) : 159-161.
Daniel, R.A. ; A.T. Michael and D.H. Floyd 2012. A Low - Cost Quantitative Absorption Spectrophotometer. J. Chem. Educ. 89 : 1432-1435.
Holman W.I.M. 1943. A new technique for the determination of phosphorus by the molybdenum blue method. Biochem J. 37 (2) : 256 -259.
Hosker, B.S. 2018. Demonstrating Principles of Spectrophotometry by Constructing a Simple, Low - Cost, Functional Spectrophotometer Utilizing the Light Sensor on a Smartphone. J. Chem. Educ. 95 : 178 − 181.
Jackson, M.L. 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Mehlich, A. 1984. Mehlich 3 soil test extractant : A modification o f Mehlich 2 extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 15 : 1409 – 1416.
Pansu, M. and J. Gautheyro. 2006. Handbook of Soil Analysis : Mineralogical, Organic and Inorganic Methods. Springer, Berlin.
Pradhan, S. and M. Pokhrel. 2013. Spectrophotometric Determination of Phosphate in Sugarcane Juice, Fertilizer, Detergent and Water Samples by Molybdenum Blue Method. Scientific World. 11(11) : 58-62.
United States Department Agricultural. 2009. Soil Survey field and laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report. 51 Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Wuenscher, R., H. Unterfrauner. R. Peticzka and F. Zehetner. 2015. A comparison of 14 soil phosphorus extraction methods applied to 50 agricultural soils from Central Europe. Plant Soil Environ. 61 (2) : 86-96.
Zbíral, J. and P. Němec. 2002. Comparison of Mehlich 2, Mehlich 3, CAL, Egner, Olsen, and 0.01 M CaCl2 extractants for determination of phosphorus in soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 33 : 3405 – 3417.

Published

2020-06-18

How to Cite

Intaravicha, N. (2020). Efficacy of Shoebox Spectrophotometer Program Working on Smartphone to Measure Absorbance for Soil Phosphorus Analysis by Molybdenum Blue Colorimetric Method. Thai Agricultural Research Journal, 38(2), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.14456/thaidoa-agres.2020.11

Issue

Section

Technical or research paper