Effects of pattern systems on production performance and egg quality of laying hen

  • Suphawadee Yeamkong Faculty of Food and Agriculture Technology, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, Phitsanilok Province 65000
  • Tuan Nguyen Ngoc Faculty of Food and Agriculture Technology, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, Phitsanilok Province 65000
  • Prapasiri Jaipong
  • Patthanun Kothum
  • Sukanya Tangmo
Keywords: Laying hen, pattern systems, production performance, egg quality


The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of pattern raising systems on production performance and egg quality of laying hens. One hundred twenty laying hens and 30 weeks of age were used in completely randomized design (CRD). The study was divided into 2 patterns: 1) conventional battery cage pattern; and 2) floor pen pattern. The conventional battery cage pattern had dimension of 30 × 40 × 37 cm with 2 laying hens each while in floor pen pattern was 5 m2 with 10 laying hens each. Each treatment had 10 replicates (120 laying hens). All laying hens were provided with the same diet during 30 days of experimental period. The results showed that the laying hen pattern systems affected to egg production performance and egg quality. Feed intake and egg production of laying hens in the conventional battery cage pattern were significantly higher than those in the floor pen pattern (p<0.05). However, hens in floor pens showed better results of feed conversion ratio, egg weight and Haugh unit than those from conventional pattern (p<0.05).


Download data is not yet available.


1. Van Den Brand H, Parmentier HK, Kemp B. Br Poult Sci. 2004;45(6):745-752.

2. Singh K, Cheng KM, Silversides FG. Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poult Sci J. 2009;88(2):256-264.

3. Intharamongkol J. Free-range organic egg/Happy chick. Livestock Organic Center. Bureau of Animal Husbandry and Genetic Improvement. Department of Livestock Development, Bangkok, Thailand; 2010.

4. Englmaierova M, Tumova E, Charvatova V, Skrivan M. Effect of laying hens housing system on laying performance egg quality characteristics and egg microbial contamination. Czech J Anim Sci. 2014;59(8):345–352.

5. Thukhanon B. Effect of laying hen rearing systems on production performance, egg quality, cholesterol content and fatty acid composition of egg. Master of Science in Animal production technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Thailand; 2014.

6. NRC. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th Ed. National Academy Press. Washington DC: USA; 1994.

7. Hunton P. Egg production, processing and marketing. Word Poultry Science. Elsevier, Tokyo; 1995.

8. SAS. SAS Online Dec 9.13. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA; 2004.

9. Duncan DB. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 1995;11:1-42.

10. Yakubu A, Salako AE, Ige AO. Effects of genotype and housing system on the laying performance of chickens in different seasons in the semi-humid tropics. Int J Poult Sci. 2007;6(6):434-439.

11. Inbaraj S, Sejian V, Bagath M, Bhatta R. Impact of Heat Stress on Immune Responses of Livestock: A Review. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci. 2016;39(4):459-482.

12. Yildirim H, Kaya S. Egg production and quality traits of layers kept in free range housing system. Greener J Agric Sci. 2017;7(2):61-64.

13. Wang XL, Zheng JX, Ning ZH, Qu LJ, Xu GY, Yang N. Laying performance and egg quality of blue-shelled layers as affected by different housing systems. Poult Sci J. 2009;88(7):1485-1492.

14. Basmacioglu H, Ergul M. Research on the factors affecting cholesterol content and some other characteristics of eggs in laying hens. Turk J of Vet and Anim Sci. 2005;29:157-164.

15. Tauson R, Wahlstrom A, Abrahamsson P. Effect of two floor housing systems and cages on health production and fear response in layers. J Appl Poult Res. 1999;8(2):152–159.
How to Cite
Yeamkong S, Ngoc TN, Jaipong P, Kothum P, Tangmo S. Effects of pattern systems on production performance and egg quality of laying hen. Naresaun Phayao J [Internet]. 2019Aug.30 [cited 2020Jul.10];12(2):18-4. Available from: https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journalup/article/view/202318
Research articles