The ability of timed-up and go test and five times sit-to-stand test to screen risk of fall in well-functioning elderly

  • Roongnapa Intaruk Khon Kaen university
  • Jittima Saengsuwan
  • Sugalya Amatachaya
  • Chitanongk Gaogasigam
  • Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij
Keywords: Cut-off score, Balance ability, Leg muscle strength, Risk of fall, Healthy elderly

Abstract

Aging process can naturally affect the restriction of physical function, which result in an increased risk of fall even though in well-functioning elderly. Therefore, an early detect of functional ability in those with risk of fall should be concerned. Evidence supported that the timed-up and go test (TUG) and five times sit-to-stand test (FTSST) are commonly used to assess balance impairment and leg muscle weakness, which were common risk factors of fall. However, there were no any studies reported the cut-off scores of the TUG and FTSST for determining risk of fall in well-functioning elderly. Thus, this study aimed to identify the cut-off scores of the TUG and FTSST for determining risk of fall in these individuals, which were classified into the age of 65-74 years and 75 years and older. They were screened their risk of fall using the tandem stand test and history of fall within the past 6 months, then they were investigated the TUG and FTSST. The findings reported the cut-off scores of the TUG as more than 9.50 seconds (70.21% sensitivity, 56.99% specificity) and 10.50 seconds (81.82% sensitivity, 66.67% specificity); additionally, the cut-off scores of FTSST more than 11.50 seconds (73.91% sensitivity, 62.64% specificity) and 12.10 seconds (61.54% sensitivity, 50.00% specificity) represented risk of fall in elderly, who aged 65-74 years and 75 years and older, respectively. The findings suggested the suitable cut-off scores of the TUG and FTSST as screening criteria to early detect risk of fall in well-functional elderly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Langley F, Mackintosh S. Functional balance assessment of older community dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Allied Health Sci Pract. 2007;5(4):1-11.

Terroso M, Rosa N, Torres Marques A, Simoes R. Physical consequences of falls in the elderly: a literature review from 1995 to 2010. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2014;11(1): 51-59.

Gill TM, Murphy TE, Gahbauer EA, Allore HG. Association of injurious falls with disability outcomes and nursing home admissions in community-living older persons. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(3):418-425.

Thaweewannakij T, Suwannarat P, Mato L, Amatachaya S. Functional ability and health status of community-dwelling late age elderly people with and without a history of falls. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2016;34:1-9.

Chu L, Chi I, Chiu A. Falls and fall-related injuries in community-dwelling elderly persons in Hong Kong: a study on risk factors, functional decline, and health services utilisation after falls. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13(Suppl 1):S8-S12.

Rogers ME, Rogers NL, Takeshima N, Islam MM. Methods to assess and improve the physical parameters associated with fall risk in older adults. Prev Med. 2003;36(3):255-264.

Stel VS, Smit JH, Pluijm SM, Lips P. Consequences of falling in older men and women and risk factors for health service use and functional decline. Age Ageing. 2004;33(1):58-65.

Aoyagi K, Ross PD, Davis JW, Wasnich RD, Hayashi T, Takemoto T. Falls among community-dwelling elderly in Japan. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13(9):1468-1474.

Rizzo JA, Baker DI, McAvay G, Tinetti ME. The cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial targeted prevention program for falls among community elderly persons. Med Care. 1996;34(9):954-969.

Lusardi MM, Pellecchia GL, Schulman M. Functional Performance in Community Living Older Adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2003;26(3): 14-22.

Kim JC, Chon J, Kim HS, Lee JH, Yoo SD, Kim DH, et al. The association between fall history and physical performance tests in the community-dwelling elderly: a cross-sectional analysis. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(2):239-247.

Alexandre TS, Meira DM, Rico NC, Mizuta SK. Accuracy of Timed Up and Go Test for screening risk of falls among community-dwelling elderly. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2012;

(5):381-388.

Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2): 142-148.

Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9): 896-903.

Whitney SL, Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Gee MA, Redfern MS, Furman JM. Clinical measurement of sit-to-stand performance in people with balance disorders: validity of data for the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test. Phys Ther. 2005;85(10):1034-1045.

Bassey EJ, Fiatarone MA, O'Neill EF, Kelly M, Evans WJ, Lipsitz LA. Leg extensor power and functional performance in very old men and women. Clin Sci (Lond). 1992;82(3):321-327.

Bohannon RW. Sit-to-stand test for measuring performance of lower extremity muscles. Percept Mot Skills. 1995;80(1):163-166.

Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther. 2002;82(2):128-137.

Lin MR, Hwang HF, Hu MH, Wu HD, Wang YW, Huang FC. Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and Tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(8):1343-1348.

Poncumhak P SB, Srithawong A. Validity of five times sit to stand test for the evaluation of risk of fall in community-dwelling older adults. Bull Chiang Mai Assoc Med Sci. 2016;49:236-244.

Goldberg A, Chavis M, Watkins J, Wilson T. The five-times-sit-to-stand test: validity, reliability and detectable change in older females. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012;24(4):339-344.

Poncumhak P DW, Srithawong A, Sittitan M. The optimal cut-off score of the dynamic balance test for prediction risk of falls in community-dwelling older adults. Srinagarind Med J. 2018;33(4):334-338.

Poncumhak P SM, Srithawong A. The development of simple screening tool for predict. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016;99(8):956-962.

Intaruk R, Saengsuwan J, Amatachaya S, Thaweewannakij T. The ability of Thai-FRAT’s item to identify risk of fall in elderly with and without history of fall. Proceeding of 19th National Graduate Research Conference; 2018 March 9; Graduate school, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Fan J, Upadhye S, Worster A. Understanding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. CJEM. 2006;8(1):19-20.

Thaweewannakij T, Wilaichit S, Chuchot R, Yuenyong Y, Saengsuwan J, Siritaratiwat W, et al. Reference values of physical performance in Thai elderly people who are functioning well and dwelling in the community. Phys Ther. 2013;93(10):1312-1320.

Published
2021-04-30
How to Cite
1.
Intaruk R, Saengsuwan J, Amatachaya S, Gaogasigam C, Thaweewannakij T. The ability of timed-up and go test and five times sit-to-stand test to screen risk of fall in well-functioning elderly. Naresaun Phayao J [Internet]. 2021Apr.30 [cited 2021Oct.23];14(1):54-3. Available from: https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journalup/article/view/247051
Section
Research articles