Exploratory study on usability and product emotion testing of mechanic prosthetic hand usage
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Metic Hand testing is known as a more economical and widespread in Indonesian society than bionic hand. The rapid development of mechanic prosthetic hand only focuses their function during the prototype test, without considering the usability and user emotion. The need of ergonomics, safe and aesthetic product are as important as the function. Therefore, this research aims to test usability of the mechanic prosthetic hand using the therapy equIpment for hand disorder evaluation and product emotion measurement tools (PrEmo). Daily tasks were assigned to one respondent to determine their usability, while thirty-five respondents were tested to determine the product emotion. The product usability performance criteria based on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) was explored using ISO 9241-11, which consists of efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction criteria. In addition, the usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use and PrEmo tool questionnaires were used to determine the respondents’ subjective pleasure and usefulness. Usability Levels are known to be in excellent and good status. It captures special feeling from respondents when used has some disadvantages that need to be corrected. The results of the emotional assessment provide inputs from the respondents were in the form of products shape, stiffness, texture and skin-like color.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Adioetomo, S. M., Mont, D., & Irwanto. (2014). Persons with disabilities empirical: Facts and implications for social protection policies. https://www.tnp2k.go.id/images/uploads/downloads/DisabilitiesreportFinalsept2014(1)-1.pdf
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Profil penduduk Indonesia hasil supas 2015. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2016/11/30/63daa471092bb2cb7c1fada6/profil-penduduk-indonesia-hasil-supas-2015.html
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Survei sosial ekonomi nasional 2020 maret (KOR). https://silastik.bps.go.id/v3/index.php/mikrodata/detail/c2NMQ1NXelhIUzM4NEcwS0R4bGZtZz09
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Disability. https://sensus.bps.go.id/topik/dataset/sp2022/16
Burgerhof, J. G. M., Vasluian, E., Dijkstra, P. U., Bongers, R. M., & van der Sluis, C. K. (2017). The southampton hand assessment procedure revisited: A transparent linear scoring system, applied to data of experienced prosthetic users. Journal of Hand Therapy, 30(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2016.05.001
Clement, R. G. E., Bugler, K. E., & Oliver, C. W. (2011). Bionic prosthetic hands: A review of present technology and future aspirations. The Surgeon, 9(6), 336–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2011.06.001
Desmet, P. (2004). Measuring emotion: Development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In M. A. Blythe, K. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology: From usability to enjoyment (pp. 111–123). Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_12
Feix, T., Romero, J., Schmiedmayer, H.-B., Dollar, A. M., & Kragic, D. (2016). The GRASP taxonomy of human grasp types. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 46(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2015.2470657
Gallagher, P., & MacLachlan, M. (2002). Evaluating a written emotional disclosure homework intervention for lower-limb amputees. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(10), 1464–1466. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.34622
Gonzalez, J., Soma, H., Sekine, M., & Yu, W. (2012). Psycho-physiological assessment of a prosthetic hand sensory feedback system based on an auditory display: A preliminary study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 9(1), Article 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-33
Greenberg, A. M., & Spitaletta, J. A. (2020). Mixed reality social prosthetic system. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 35(3), 190–199.
Gupta, P. K., Parmar, N. K., & Mand, G. S. (2001). Patient satisfaction in prosthetic rehabilitation programme. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 57(2), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-1237(01)80122-2
Isern-Kebschull, J., Tomas, X., García-Díez, A. I., Morata, L., Moya, I., Ríos, J., & Soriano, A. (2020). Value of multidetector computed tomography for the differentiation of delayed aseptic and septic complications after total hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiology, 49(6), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03355-1
ISO. (1998). ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) part 11: Guidance on usability. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=16883
Jordan, P. W. (2000). Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human factors. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203305683
Kashef, S. R., Amini, S., & Akbarzadeh, A. (2020). Robotic hand: A review on linkage-driven finger mechanisms of prosthetic hands and evaluation of the performance criteria. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 145, Article 103677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.103677
Kyberd, P. J. (2011). The influence of control format and hand design in single axis myoelectric hands: Assessment of functionality of prosthetic hands using the Southampton hand assessment procedure. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 35(3), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364611418554
Legro, M. W., Reiber, G. D., Smith, D. G., Del Aguila, M., Larsen, J., & Boone, D. (1998). Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: Assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79(8), 931–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90090-9
Light, C. M., Chappell, P. H., & Kyberd, P. J. (2002). Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: Normative data, reliability, and validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(6), 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.32737
Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface, 8(2), 3–6.
Meyer, B., & Asbrock, F. (2018). Disabled or cyborg? How bionics affect stereotypes toward people with physical disabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2251. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02251
Nalurita, R., Yogasara, T., & Hariandja, J. (2015). Evaluasi metode dan kriteria usability testing pada aplikasi mobile untuk anak-anak sekolah dasar di Indonesia [Evaluation of usability testing methods and criteria on mobile applications for primary school children in indonesia]. In Prosiding Industrial Engineering National Conference (IENACO) 2015 (pp. 592–598). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/handle/11617/5891 [in Indonesian]
Nielsen, J. (2012). How many test users in a usability study? https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-many-test-users/
Núñez, M., Vilchez Cavazos, F., Núñez Juarez, E., Martinez-Pastor, J. C., Maculé Beneyto, F., Suso, S., & Soriano Viladomiu, A. (2015). Measuring outcomes: Pain and quality of life 48 months after acute postoperative total knee prosthetic joint infection. Pain Practice, 15(7), 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12214
Parry, R., Soria, S. M., Pradat-Diehl, P., Marchand-Pauvert, V., Jarrassé, N., & Roby-Brami, A. (2019). Effects of hand configuration on the grasping, holding, and placement of an instrumented object in patients with hemiparesis. Frontiers in Neurology, 10, Article 240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00240
Rubin, J., & Chisnell, D. (2008). Handbook of usability testing (2nd ed.). Wiley Publishing.
Salem, F. H. A., Mohamed, K. S., Mohamed, S. B. K., & Gehani, A. A. E. (2013). The development of body-powered prosthetic hand controlled by EMG signals using DSP processor with virtual prosthesis implementation. Conference Papers in Science, 2013(1), Article 598945. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/598945
Shin, D., & Wang, Z. (2015). The experimentation of matrix for product emotion. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2295–2302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.375
Starke, J., Weiner, P., Crell, M., & Asfour, T. (2022). Semi-autonomous control of prosthetic hands based on multimodal sensing, human grasp demonstration and user intention. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 154, Article 104123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104123
Susanto, N., Budiawan, W., Ismail, R., Ariyanto, M., & Sahal, A. (2018). Usability evaluation of anthropomorphic prosthetic hand based on ISO 9241-11. MATEC Web of Conference, 159, Article 02069. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815902069
Susanto, N., Prastawa, H., Mahachandra, M., & Rakhmawati, D. A. (2019). Evaluation of usability on bionic anthropomorphic (BIMO) hand for disability hand patient. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 18(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.23917/jiti.v18i2.8133
Tavakoli, M., Benussi, C., & Lourenco, J. L. (2017). Single channel surface EMG control of advanced prosthetic hands: A simple, low cost and efficient approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 79, 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.012
Vatankhah, N., Wei, K. T., & Letchmunan, S. (2014). Usability measurement of Malaysian online tourism websites. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 8(12), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijseia.2014.8.12.01
Verheul, F. J. M.-G., Verschuren, O., Zwinkels, M., Herwegh, M., Michielsen, A., de Haan, M., & van Wijk, I. (2020). Effectiveness of a crossover prosthetic foot in active children with a congenital lower limb deficiency: An explorative study. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 44(5), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/03093646209120
Weir, R. F., Grahn, E. C., & Duff, S. J. (2001). A new externally powered, myoelectrically controlled prosthesis for persons with partial-hand amputations at the metacarpals. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 13(2), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008526-200106000-00009
Yogasara, T., & Lestari, D. (2008, July 29). Perancangan dashboard mobil kategori mini MPV yang memperhatikan aspek ergonomi dan kriteria product emotion [Paper presentation]. National Conference on Applied Ergonomics (CAE 2008), Yogyakarta, Indonesia. https://lppm.unpar.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2016/09/Thedy26_CAE_2008.pdf [in Indonesian]
Zbinden, J., Lendaro, E., & Ortiz-Catalan, M. (2022). Prosthetic embodiment: Systematic review on definitions, measures, and experimental paradigms. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 19(1), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01006-6
