Comparison of stress distribution on articular disc between the Hunsuck/Epker and NM-Low Z plasty technique for mandibular setback procedure

Main Article Content

Chutiwat Sakyanun
Narissaporn Chaiprakit
Samroeng Inglam
Siripatra Patchanee

Abstract

Novel modification of Low Z plasty (NM-Low Z) technique is a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) technique in which the incision line is designed to create more inferior support at the proximal segment compared to the Hunsuck/Epker (HE) modification. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the stress distribution patterns at the articular disc of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) using the NM-Low Z technique and HE modification in mandibular prognathism models. Finite element models of the mandible including the TMJ from a CT scan of a patient with skeletal class III deformity that required mandibular setback surgery, were segmented using the NM-Low Z and HE modification techniques. The mandible was moved 7 mm posteriorly and fixed with 2.0 mm miniplates
and screws. The material properties of the articular discs were simulated as homogenous, isotropic, and linear elastic materials. Finite element analysis was used to evaluate the equivalent von Mises stress on the articular disc of the TMJ. Various muscular and biting forces were applied to simulate 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively in both models. The maximum von Mises stresses of the articular disc in the NM-Low Z model were 60.64, 36.43, and 76.38 MPa, while those of the HE modification model were 73.40, 29.94, and 82.51 MPa at 1, 3, and 12 months, respectively. Both techniques resulted in normal stress distribution patterns on the articular disc surface. In conclusion, the NM-Low Z technique is an option for BSSO in terms of providing a lower maximum von Mises stress at the articular disc than the HE modification technique, while also providing a normal stress distribution pattern similar to the HE modification technique.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sakyanun, C., Chaiprakit, N., Inglam, S., & Patchanee, S. (2024). Comparison of stress distribution on articular disc between the Hunsuck/Epker and NM-Low Z plasty technique for mandibular setback procedure. Science, Engineering and Health Studies, 18, 24050020. https://doi.org/10.69598/sehs.18.24050020
Section
Health sciences

References

Böckmann, R., Meyns, J., Dik, E., and Kessler, P. (2014). The modifications of the sagittal ramus split osteotomy: A literature review. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 2(12), e271.

Chaiprakit, N., Oupadissakoon, C., Klaisiri, A., and Patchanee, S. (2021). A surgeon-friendly BSSO by the novel modification of low Z plasty: Approach focus and case report: A case report. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research, 14(2), 768–772.

Choi, Y. J., Lim, H., Chung, C. J., Park, K. H., and Kim, K. H. (2014). Two-year follow-up of changes in bite force and occlusal contact area after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 43(6), 742–747.

Dumrongwanich, O., Chantarapanich, N., Patchanee, S., Inglam, S., and Chaiprakit, N. (2022). Finite element analysis between Hunsuck/Epker and novel modification of low Z plasty technique of mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 236(5), 646–655.

Epker, B. N. (1977). Modifications in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible. Journal of Oral Surgery (American Dental Association: 1965), 35(2), 157–159.

Fedorov, A., Beichel, R., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Finet, J., Fillion-Robin, J.-C., Pujol, S., Bauer, C., Jennings, D., Fennessy, F., Sonka, M., Buatti, J., Aylward, S., Miller, J. V., Pieper, S., and Kikinis, R. (2012). 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 30(9), 1323–1341.

Harada, K., Kikuchi, T., Morishima, S., Sato, M., Ohkura, K., and Omura, K. (2003). Changes in bite force and dentoskeletal morphology in prognathic patients after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 95(6), 649–654.

Huang, H.-L., Su, K.-C., Fuh, L.-J., Chen, M. Y. C., Wu, J., Tsai, M.-T., and Hsu, J.-T. (2015). Biomechanical analysis of a temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis during various clenching tasks. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 43(7), 1194–1201.

Imampai, S., Patchanee, S., Klaisiri, A., and Chaiprakit, N. (2022). Evaluation of skeletal changes after mandibular setback surgery using the NM-Low Z plasty technique in skeletal class III patients. European Journal of Dentistry, 17(2), 381–386.

Kang, H.-S., Han, J. J., Jung, S., Kook, M.-S., Park, H.-J., and Oh, H.-K. (2020). Comparison of postoperative condylar changes after unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional analysis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 130(5), 505–514.

Kijak, E., Margielewicz, J., and Pihut, M. (2020). Identification of biomechanical properties of temporomandibular discs. Pain Research and Management, 2020, 6032832.

Kim, Y.-K., Yun, P.-Y., Ahn, J.-Y., Kim, J.-W., and Kim, S.-G. (2009). Changes in the temporomandibular joint disc position after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 108(1), 15–21.

Kobayashi, T., Honma, K., Izumi, K., Hayashi, T., Shingaki, S., and Nakajima, T. (1999). Temporomandibular joint symptoms and disc displacement in patients with mandibular prognathism. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 37(6), 455–458.

Lai, L., Huang, C., Zhou, F., Xia, F., and Xiong, G. (2020). Finite elements analysis of the temporomandibular joint disc in patients with intra-articular disorders. BMC Oral Health, 20, 93.

Li, H., Zhou, N., Huang, X., Zhang, T., He, S., and Guo, P. (2020). Biomechanical effect of asymmetric mandibular prognathism treated with BSSRO and USSRO on temporomandibular joints: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 58(9), 1103–1109.

Liu, Z., Shu, J., Zhang, Y., and Fan, Y. (2018). The biomechanical effects of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on temporomandibular joint. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 21(11), 617–624.

Ma, H., Shu, J., Wang, Q., Teng, H., and Liu, Z. (2020). Effect of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on stress distribution of temporomandibular joints in patients with mandibular prognathism under symmetric occlusions. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 23(16), 1297–1305.

Mitsukawa, N., Morishita, T., Saiga, A., Kubota, Y., Omori, N., Akita, S., and Satoh, K. (2013). Dislocation of temporomandibular joint: Complication of sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 24(5), 1674–1675.

Patrick, S., Birur, N. P., Gurushanth, K., Raghavan, A. S., and Gurudath, S. (2017). Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with Hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An in vitro study. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 28(1), 66–70.

Pinheiro, M., Willaert, R., Khan, A., Krairi, A., and Van Paepegem, W. (2021). Biomechanical evaluation of the human mandible after temporomandibular joint replacement under different biting conditions. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 14034.

Puricelli, E., Fonseca, J. S. O., de Paris, M. F., and Sant'Anna, H. (2007). Applied mechanics of the Puricelli osteotomy: A linear elastic analysis with the finite element method. Head & Face Medicine, 3, 38.

Shu, J., Zhang, Y., and Liu, Z. (2019). Biomechanical comparison of temporomandibular joints after orthognathic surgery before and after design optimization. Medical Engineering & Physics, 68, 11–16.

Takahara, N., Kabasawa, Y., Sato, M., Tetsumura, A., Kurabayashi, T., and Omura, K. (2017). MRI changes in the temporomandibular joint following mandibular setback surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation. CRANIO, 35(1), 38–45.

Tangarturonrasme, P., and Sununliganon, L. (2016). Modified bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for correction of severe anterior open bite: Technical note and case report. Chulalongkorn Medical Journal, 60(1), 45–54.

Togashi, M., Kobayashi, T., Hasebe, D., Funayama, A., Mikami, T., Saito, I., Hayashi, T., and Saito, C. (2013). Effects of surgical orthodontic treatment for dentofacial deformities on signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology, 25(1), 18–23.

Ueki, K., Marukawa, K., Nakagawa, K., and Yamamoto, E. (2002). Condylar and temporomandibular joint disc positions after mandibular osteotomy for prognathism. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 60(12), 1424–1432.

Ueki, K., Moroi, A., Sotobori, M., Ishihara, Y., Marukawa, K., Yoshizawa, K., Kato, K., and Kawashiri, S. (2012). Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 40(8), 821–827.

Yang, X.-W., Long, X., Yeweng, S.-J., and Kao, C.-T. (2007). Evaluation of mandibular setback after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with the Hunsuck modification and miniplate fixation. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 65(11), 2176–2180.