Modified mini-incision surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome: Technique and clinical outcome

Main Article Content

Saran Malisorn

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is caused by the shortening of the median nerves in the wrist, resulting in hand pain and paralysis necessitating surgical operation for relief. Conventional open carpal tunnel release (CTR) procedures, involving long incisions, often lead to complications, delaying patients’ recovery for weeks or months. Therefore, mini-incision surgery has emerged as a preferred option, offering reduced pain, smaller wounds, and improved appearance. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of modified mini-incision surgery for CTS before and after the operation. It was a retrospective study involving 80 patients, with data collected from medical records pre- and post-operation, specifically at the 2nd week, 3rd month, 6th month, 12th month, and 24th month intervals. Variables included operation time, incision length, pinch strength, gripping strength, two-point discrimination (2-PD), visual analogue scale (VAS), Levine score, quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (Quick-DASH), wound pain, and pillar pain. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression, with a significant level of 0.05. The mean incision length was 11.54 mm. At the 2-week post-operative mark, the pinch strength was 5.43, gripping strength was 14.96, 2-PD was 5.84, the VAS score was 2.86, the Levine symptom was 3.84, and the DASH score was 69.43. There was a relationship (p-value<0.05) between preoperative and postoperative measures for pinch strength, gripping strength, 2-PD, and Levine symptom condition. The study on 80 patients who underwent modified mini-incision surgery for CTS at Naresuan University Hospital in Phitsanulok, Thailand, found that these parameters showed significant improvement postoperatively. Patients demonstrated good recovery and condition 2 weeks after the mini-incision surgery for CTS.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Malisorn, S. (2024). Modified mini-incision surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome: Technique and clinical outcome. Science, Engineering and Health Studies, 18, 24050005. https://doi.org/10.69598/sehs.18.24050005
Section
Health sciences

References

Bai, J., Kong, L., Zhao, H., Yu, K., Zhang, B., Zhang, J., and Tian D. (2018). Carpal tunnel release with a new mini-incision approach versus a conventional approach, a retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Surgery, 52, 105–109.

Harness, N. G., Inacio, M. C., Pfeil, F. F., and Paxton, L. W. (2010). Rate of infection after carpal tunnel release surgery and effect of antibiotic prophylaxis. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 35(2), 189–196.

Hu, F., Lu, L., Zeng, J., Li, D., and Liu, B. (2022). Comparison of the therapeutic effect of the mini-open incision and conventional open neurolysis of the median nerve for carpal tunnel syndrome. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 2022, 4082618.

Klein, R. D., Kotsis, S. V., and Chung, K. C. (2003). Open carpal tunnel release using a 1-centimeter incision: Technique and outcomes for 104 patients. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 111(5), 1616–1622.

Liawrungrueang, W., and Wongsiri, S. (2020). Effectiveness of surgical treatment in carpal tunnel syndrome mini-incision using MIS-CTS kits: A cadaveric study. Advances in Orthopedics, 2020, 8278054.

Malisorn S. (2023). The mini-incision technique versus conventional open approach for carpal tunnel release: A retrospective, comparative cohort study. Cureus, 15(10), e47814.

Matloub, H. S., Yan, J. G., Mink van der Molen, A. B., Zhang, L. L., and Sanger, J. R. (1998). The detailed anatomy of the palmar cutaneous nerves and its clinical implications. Journal of Hand Surgery, 23(3), 373–379.

Morán-Morán, J., Mérida-Velasco, J. R., Del Valle, E. B., and Murillo-González, J. (2021). A mini-incision carpal tunnel release technique to prevent pillar pain: A technical note. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 55(1), 73–75.

Orak, M. M., Gümüştaş, S. A., Onay, T., Uludag, S., Bulut, G., and Börü, U. T. (2016). Comparison of postoperative pain after open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled study. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 50(1), 65–69.

Patterson, J., and Simmons, B. P. (2002). Outcomes assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand Clinics, 18(2), 359–363.

Povlsen, B., and Tegnell, I. (1996). Incidence and natural history of touch allodynia after open carpal tunnel release. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 30(3), 221–225.

Saw, N. L. B., Jones, S., Shepstone, L., Meyer, M., Chapman, P. G., and Logan, A. M. (2003). Early outcome and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: A randomized prospective trial. Journal of Hand Surgery, 28(5), 444–449.

Townshend, D. N., Taylor, P. K., and Gwynne-Jones, D. P. (2005). The outcome of carpal tunnel decompression in elderly patients. Journal of Hand Surgery, 30(3), 500–505.

Van den Broeke, L. R, Theuvenet, W. J., and van Wingerden, J. J. (2019). Effectiveness of mini-open carpal tunnel release: An outcome study. Archives of Plastic Surgery, 46(4), 350–358.

Wongsiri, S., Sarasombath, P., and Liawrungrueang, W. (2022). Minimally invasive carpal tunnel release: A clinical case study and surgical technique. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 32(3), 10495.