Development of a low-cost continuous passive motion machine for the enhanced rehabilitation of elderly individuals with osteoarthritis
Main Article Content
Abstract
With the increasing global prevalence of osteoarthritis and the expansion of the aging population, this research presents an innovative low-cost continuous passive motion (CPM) machine tailored to meet the specific rehabilitation needs of elderly individuals, particularly those grappling with osteoarthritis. The primary aim of this study was to address the increasing demand for effective knee rehabilitation tools in this population. The newly developed CPM machine offers a versatile range of features, allowing users to customize the treatment times, knee joint motion angles, and speed levels. Statistical analysis demonstrated the accuracy and reliability of the machine, which is designed for knee rehabilitation in elderly individuals. A one-way ANOVA showed no significant difference between the machine’s performance and control units, both in terms of the angle replication and time measurements. The precision and consistency of the device were underscored by the close alignment of the CPM machine with goniometer measurements and the minimal error in time measurements, which did not exceed 2.66% and 0.13% during the first 20 minutes of use. These statistical findings confirm the efficacy of the CPM machine in delivering reliable and accurate knee rehabilitation, with potential benefits for improving quality of life and mobility.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Almusawi, H., & Husi, G. (2021). Design and development of continuous passive motion (CPM) for fingers and wrist grounded-exoskeleton rehabilitation system. Applied Sciences, 11(2), Article 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020815
Berry, D. J., Harmsen, W. S., Cabanela, M. E., & Morrey, B. F. (2002). Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary charnley total hip replacements: Factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 84(2), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200202000-00002
Bible, J. E., Simpson, A. K., Biswas, D., Pelker, R. R., & Grauer, J. N. (2009). Actual knee motion during continuous passive motion protocols is less than expected. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 467(10), 2656–2661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0766-1
Brosseau, L., Taki, J., Desjardins, B., Thevenot, O., Fransen, M., Wells, G. A., Mizusaki Imoto, A., Toupin-April, K., Westby, M., Álvarez Gallardo, I. C., Gifford, W., Laferrière, L., Rahman, P., Loew, L., De Angelis, G., Cavallo, S., Mehdi Shallwani, S., Aburub, A., Bennell, K. L., … & McLean, L. (2017). The Ottawa panel clinical practice guidelines for the management of knee osteoarthritis. Part two: Strengthening exercise programs. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31(5), 596–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215517691084
Cherian, J. J., Jauregui, J. J., Banerjee, S., Pierce, T., & Mont, M. A. (2015). What host factors affect aseptic loosening after THA and TKA? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 473(8), 2700–2709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4220-2
Cross, M., Smith, E., Hoy, D., Nolte, S., Ackerman, I., Fransen, M., Bridgett, L., Williams, S., Guillemin, F., Hill, C. L., Laslett, L. L., Jones, G., Cicuttini, F., Osborne, R., Vos, T., Buchbinder, R., Woolf, A., & March, L. (2014). The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: Estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 73(7), 1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763
Herbold, J. A., Bonistall, K., Blackburn, M., Agolli, J., Gaston, S., Gross, C., Kuta, A., & Babyar, S. (2014). Randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of continuous passive motion after total knee replacement. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(7), 1240–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.012
Hunter, D. J., Schofield, D., & Callander, E. (2014). The individual and socioeconomic impact of osteoarthritis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 10(7), 437–441. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2014.44
Johnston, R. C., Fitzgerald, R. H., Jr., Harris, W. H., Poss, R., Müller, M. E., & Sledge, C. B. (1990). Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement: A standard system of terminology for reporting results. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 72(2), 161–168.
Kim, M. S., Kim, J. J., Kang, K. H., Ihm, J. S., & In, Y. (2023). Ankle pain after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy in patients with knee osteoarthritis and concurrent ankle osteoarthritis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(2), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221143999
Lee, B. C., Moon, C. W., Choi, W. S., Kim, Y. M., Joo, Y. B., Lee, D. G., Lee, S. J., Choi, E. S., Ji, J. H., Suh, D. W., & Cho, K. H. (2022). Clinical evaluation of usefulness and effectiveness of sitting type continuous passive motion machines in patients with total knee arthroplasty: A study protocol for a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23(1), Article 565. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05507-2
Mille, M. A., McClement, J., & Lauer, S. (2023). Physiotherapeutic strategies and their current evidence for canine osteoarthritis. Veterinary Sciences, 10(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10010002
Neogi, T. (2013). The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 21(9), 1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.018
Parra, D., Contreras, J. D., & Garcia, J. I. (2022). Fault detection and insulation model-based of a teleoperated technical aid for knee rehabilitation using bond graph. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(19), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.179
Rahman, R. U., Rashid, A., Shahnaz, I., Murtaza, S. R., Ahmed, A., Ali, M. R., Ejaz, K.,Tabrez, R. A., Khan, A. Q., & Khan, S. J. (2018). Smart passive rehabilitative device to enhance knee range of motion. In 2018 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES) (pp. 161–165). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECBES.2018.8626649
Saputra, M. K., & Iskandar, A. A. (2011). Development of automatic continuous passive motion therapeutic system. In 2011 2nd International Conference on Instrumentation, Communications, Information Technology, and Biomedical Engineering (pp. 376–379). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICI-BME.2011.6108630
Sun, J., Gao, S., Liu, W., Kong, F., & Li, X. (2023). Design and static analysis of new deployable mechanisms based on the four-bar slider–crank mechanism. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 51(11), 6204–6226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2022.2038617
Szabo, D. A., Cartala, V., & Neagu, N. (2023). New technologies used in the rehabilitation of knee pathologies. Health, Sports & Rehabilitation Medicine, 24(3), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.26659/pm3.2023.24.3.154
Umchid, S., & Taraphongphan, P. (2016). Design and development of a smart continuous passive motion device for knee rehabilitation. In 2016 9th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEiCON.2016.7859616
Wu, X., Sun, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2021). Correlation dimension and bifurcation analysis for the planar slider-crank mechanism with multiple clearance joints. Multibody System Dynamics, 52(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-020-09769-3