Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Klongchumphon Watershed, Ranong and Chumphon Province

Main Article Content

Thamrong Ruensukon
Yongyut Trisurat
Nipon Tangtham
Ruangrai Tokrisna

Abstract

Forest area in Klongchumphon Watershed has been converted to para-rubber, oil palm and fruit orchard. Deforestation causes changes in water yield and sediment load in the stream. Severe floods frequently occurred in down stream every year. The objectives of this research were to predict water yield, soil loss and to quantify economic value of nutrient depletion and sediment dredging in Klongchumphon Watershed, Ranong and Chumphon Province as the results of land-use change between 2012 and 2030. Three future land use scenarios were defined including 1) trends, 2) conservation, and 3) development. Geographic Information System (GIS), CLUE-S model, InVEST and USLE were used in this research. The results revealed that the scenario 1 increased area of para-rubber by 11.32 % and reduced forest area by 9.52 %. The converted forest was replaced by para-rubber by 7.73 %. In addition, the scenario 1 would provide annual water yield of 486.64 million m3 and generated sediment loss of 4.60 ton/rai/year. The cost to remove sediment out of the stream was 8.20 baht/rai. The estimated major nutrients loss (N-P-K) were 597.46, 0.01 and 0.22 kilogram/rai, respectively and the accumulated value of nutrients loss was 11,388 baht/rai. The scenario 2 slightly increased rubber plantations (2.30 %) and forest area was stable. It generated annual water yield of 480.16 million m3 and sediment loss of 4.07 ton/rai/year. The
cost to dredging was 7.27 baht/rai. The estimated major nutrients loss (N-P-K) were 529.47, 0.01 and 0.19 kilogram/rai respectively and the accumulated value of nutrients loss was 10,092 baht/rai. The land-use scenario 3 substantially most reduced forest cover by 18.32 % and 9.91 % was converted to rubber plantations. The predicted annual water yield was 494.92 million m3 and the sediment load was 5.07 ton/rai/year. The cost to remove sediment in the stream channel (8.97
baht/rai) and the accumulated value of major nutrients loss (12,455 baht/rai) were the highest among the three land-use scenarios. Based on these findings, the land-use scenario 2 is appropriate for Klongchumphon Watershed because it would generated the least soil erosion and economic loss of soil fertilizers.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ruensukon, T., Trisurat, Y., Tangtham, N., & Tokrisna, R. (2016). Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Klongchumphon Watershed, Ranong and Chumphon Province. Thai Journal of Forestry, 35(1), 62–73. Retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjf/article/view/248153
Section
Original Articles

References

Bank of Ayudhya Public Company Limited. 2012. Deposit rate. Bank of Ayudhya Public Company Limited. (in Thai)
Bureau of the Budget. 2012. Unit rate. Standard Budget Bureau, Bureau of the Budget, Bangkok. (in Thai)
Department of Internal Trade. 2012. Major fertilizer price rate. Department of Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce. (in Thai)
Land Development Department. 2000. Soil erosion in Thailand. Land Development Department, Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives, Bangkok. (in Thai)
Meteorological Department. 2012. Climate statistics 1983-2012. Meteorological Department, Ministry of Information and Communications Technology, Bangkok. (in Thai)
Nuanmano, N. 2013. Soil Erosion on Kho Hong Hill and Its Economic Loss, Hat Yai District, Songkhla Province. M.S. Thesis, Prince of Songkhla University. (in Thai)
Pontius, R. G. Jr., and L. C. Schneider. 2001. Land-Cover Change Model Validation by an ROC Method for the Ipswich Watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85 (1-3):239-248.
Royal Irrigation Department. 2012. Runoff and sediment statistic. Hydrology and water management center for southern region, Royal Irrigation Department, Bangkok. (in Thai)
Tangtham, N. 1984. Soil Erosion Control. Department of Conservation, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University. (in Thai)
Tillis, H.T., T. Ricketts, A.D. Guerry, S.A. Wood, R. Sharp, E. Nelson, D. Ennaanay, S. Wolny, N. Olwero, K. Vigerstol, D. Pennington, G. Mendoza, J. Aukema, J. Foster, J. Forrest, D. Cameron, K. Arkema, E. Lonsdorf, C. Kennedy,G. Verutes, C.K. Kim, G. Guannel,M. Papenfus, J. Toft, M. Marsik and J. Bernhardt. 2011. InVEST 2.2.2 User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford.
Trisurat, Y., R. Alkemade and P.H. Verburg. 2010. Projecting land-use change and its consequences for biodiversity in Northern Thailand. Environ Manag 45: 626-639.
Trisurat, Y. and P. Duengkae. 2011. Consequences of land use change on bird distribution at Sakaerat Environmental Research Station. J. Ecol. Field Biol. 34 (2): 203-214.
Veldkamp, A., and L. O. Fresco. 1996. CLUECR: an integrated multi-scale model to simulate land use change scenarios in Costa Rica. Ecological modeling 91: 231-24.
Verburg, P.H., A. Veldkamp and J. Bouma. 1999. Land use change under conditions of high population pressure: the case of Java. Global Environmental Change 9: 303-312.
Wischmeier, W.H. and D.D. Smith. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide for conservation planning. 63 p., USDA, Agriculture Hand Book No 537.
World Resources Institute. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water synthesis. United Nations, New York.