Operational Efficiency of Gasoline and Battery operated Chainsaws

Main Article Content

Supamas Khamwiangsa
Nopparat Kaakkurivaara
Kiattisak Bundet

Abstract

This research compared the operational efficiency between gasoline and battery operated chainsaws under 3 different aspects; cutting speed, noise, and vibration levels. The test was performed on dried eucalyptus logs with a diameter of 13 cm. Each type of chainsaw was used on 3 randomly selected logs (replicates), and each log was cut into 10 slides (repetitions). The mean differences of each of the parameters between the types of chainsaws were tested using an Independent-samples T-test. The results showed that the average time per cycle of wood cutting for the battery operated chainsaws was significantly less than the gasoline chainsaws (p = 0.033), with a mean value of 11.57 and 12.90 seconds, respectively. The operating noise level of the battery chainsaw was significantly lower than that of the gasoline chainsaw (p < 0.001), with a mean value of 81.25 and 94.65 dB(A), respectively. The mean noise level of the battery chainsaw was 15% less than the gasoline chainsaw. The operating vibration level of the battery chainsaw was statistically significant and less than that of the gasoline chainsaw (p < 0.001), with a mean value of 0.19 and 1.30 m/s2, respectively. The vibration while operating a battery chainsaw was 7 times less than a gasoline chainsaw. According to the current research, we conclude that battery chainsaws can run faster and are less affected by noise and vibration than gasoline chainsaws.

Article Details

How to Cite
Khamwiangsa, S., Kaakkurivaara, N. ., & Bundet, K. (2022). Operational Efficiency of Gasoline and Battery operated Chainsaws. Thai Journal of Forestry, 41(1), 13–21. Retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjf/article/view/252513
Section
Original Articles

References

Aggie Home. 2017. Chainsaws. Available source: https://www.aggiehomemart. com/, March 22, 2020. (in Thai)

Colantoni, A., Mazzocchi, F., Cossio, F., Cecchini, M., Bedini, R., Monarca D. 2016. Comparisons between battery chainsaws and internal combustion engine chainsaws: performance and safety. Contemporary Engineering Sciences 9(27): 1315-1337.

Kowanich, A. 1983. Rural Forestry Tools. Third Edition, The Forestry Association of Thailand, Bangkok. (in Thai)

Showbull. 2018. The Working Principle of Chainsaw. Available source: http:// www.cnshowbull.com/info/theworking-principle-of-chainsaw-24939164. html , March 11, 2020.

Stihl. 2018. STIHL Product. Available source: https://www.stihl.com, March 22, 2020.

Suetrong, W. 2016. Comparison of Noise Pollution of Chainsaws with Different Horsepower in the Process of Falling. Department of Forest Engineering, Kasetsart University. (in Thai)

Thai Safety Wiki. 2013. Hearing Protection. Available source: http://www.thai-safetywiki.com, December 25, 2020.

Watchapan, C. 2016. Sensor Testing Set for Tool Wear Monitoring with Vibration Signals. M.E. Thesis, Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology. (in Thai)