A Simulated Comparisons of Thinning Effects Using SIBYLA Program

Main Article Content

สุรพิชญ์ หอมนาน
นพรัตน์ คัคคุริวาระ

บทคัดย่อ

Thinning effects comparisons were undertaken based on two selective thinning options-thinning from below (TB) and thinning from above (TA)-and no thinning (NT). Growth and tree characteristics were investigated using the SIBYLA growth simulation program (originally designed for Czech forests) that was adapted to simulate the growth characteristics of tree species available in Thailand. Specifically, Carpinus viminea (Betulaceae) was chosen as a representative Thai species. The study investigated the effects of TB, TA, and NT on tree productivity (mean height, mean diameter, volume per stem, volume per hectare), biomass, and biodiversity. Pairwise comparisons and statistical analysis were applied. Based on the results, TB could increase the growth potential of trees after thinning more than TA and NT. Although there were similar results for TB and TA in each period, the TB data were slightly higher. However, TA and TB were not significantly different in productivity yields (p>0.05). Therefore, both TA and TB would be effective in increase production yields.


Based on the study, selective thinning model of growth using the SIBYLA program substantially reduced the computational and practical workload. This opens possibilities for further exploration of thinning algorithms and their integration into the SIBYLA program, for application in forestry simulations or the management of Thailand’s diverse plantation forests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

บท
นิพนธ์ต้นฉบับ

References

De Langhe, J. 2013. Carpinus L. Ostrya Scop. Ostryopsis Decne.-Vegetative Key to Species cultivated in Western Europe, 45: 26-46. Ghent University Botanical Garden, Belgium.

Dirr, M.A. 2009. Manual of Woody Landscape Plants, 6th eds, Stipes Publishing LLC, Champaign, Illinois, USA.

Ekholm, A., Lundqvist, L., Axelsson E.P., Egnell, G., Hjalten, J., Lundmark, T., Sjogren, J. 2023. Long-term yield and biodiversity in stands managed with the selection system and the rotation forestry system: A qualitative review. Forest Ecology and Management, 537: 120920. doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120920.

Fabrika, M. 2002. growth simulator SIBYLA. https://etools.tuzvo.sk/sibyla/english/, 03 October 2023.

Fabrika, M. 2003. Virtual forest stand as a component of sophisticated forestry. Journal of Forest Science, 49: 419-428.

Fabrika, M., Dursky, J. 2005. Algorithms and software solution of thinning models for SIBYLA growth simulator. Journal of Forest Science, 51(10): 431-445. doi: 10.17221/4577-JFS.

Jaehne, S. and Dohrenbusch, A. 1997. A method to evaluate forest stand diversity. European Journal of Forest Research, 333-345.

Kerr, G., Haufe, J. 2011. Thinning Practice a Silvicultural Guide. Forestry Commission, United Kingdom.

Mcdowell, N., Brooks, J.R., Fitzgerald, S.A., Bond, B.J. 2003. Carbon isotope discrimination and growth response of old Pinus ponderosa trees to stand density reductions. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26 (4): 631-644.

Novosadova, K., Kadlec, J., Petr, Sykora., Komanek, M., Radek, P. 2024. Evaluation of the effect

of different thinning types on dendrometric parameters and subsequent spontaneous growth in a beech-oak-linden stand. Journal of Forest Science, 70(6): 299-316. doi: 10.17221/10/2024-JFS

Simon, DC., Ameztegui, A. 2023. Modelling the influence of thinning intensity and frequency on the future provision of ecosystem services in Mediterranean mountain pine forests. European Journal of Forest Research, 142: 521-535. doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01539-y

Thiangburanatham, W. 1999. Thai Herbal Dictionary, 5th ed. Ruamsarn. Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)

Zanchi, G., Belyazid, S., Akselsson, C., Yu, L. 2014. Modelling the effects of management intensification on multiple forest services: a Swedish case study. Ecological Modelling, 284: 48-59. doi.org /10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.04.006.

Zhao, Z., Zhang, G., Liu, W., Hui, G., Hu, Y. 2022. A novel method for calculating stand structural diversity based on relationship of adjacent trees. Forests, 13(2): 343. doi.org/10.3390/f13020343