Personal Factors Affecting Work Efficiency Among Patrol Staff in Ta Phraya National Park
Main Article Content
Abstract
The effects of personal factors were investigated on the performance of 60 Ta Phraya National Park patrol staff from October 2016 to September 2021 based on a quantitative research method and data from the SMART database. The data were analyzed using the frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and the Wilcoxon signed–rank test. Based on the results, the patrol staff were non–government employees aged 40–49 years, had less than 5 years of service and had completed high school education. There had been 9,386 patrols conducted on 23,145 days, with the total patrol distance being 176,519 kilometers. Furthermore, the records included, 374 trees, 288 forage plants, 368 salt licks, 132 water sources, 394 wildlife, 18,890 animal tracks, 29 hunting, 248 logging, 226 shelter, 670 trapping, 248 guns/ammunition and 117 logging equipment. Personal factors of patrol staff with the highest performance in 3 areas were: 1) patrolling efficiency– non–government employee, aged 20–29 years, with less than 5 years of services and completed primary education; 2) ecological factors detection–were non–government employees, aged 20–29 years, with 5–9 years of service and education not exceeding secondary school, 3) threatening factors detection–aged 20–29 years, with less than 5 years of service and employed on a term contract and education to lower secondary school level. In addition, personal factors, such as age, years of service, employment status and education, had different effects on the performance of the patrol staff. The results of this study could be used as guidelines for human resource management. Taking into account the potential and personal factors of each patrol staff member would help to maximize the results from the SMART patrol operation and provide sustainable protection for the area.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ข้าพเจ้าและผู้เขียนร่วม (ถ้ามี) ขอรับรองว่า ต้นฉบับที่เสนอมานี้ยังไม่เคยได้รับการตีพิมพ์และไม่ได้อยู่ในระหว่างกระบวนการพิจารณาตีพิมพ์ลงในวารสารหรือสิ่งตีพิมพ์อื่นใด ข้าพเจ้าและผู้เขียนร่วม (ถ้ามี) ยอมรับหลักเกณฑ์และเงื่อนไขการพิจารณาต้นฉบับ ทั้งยินยอมให้กองบรรณาธิการมีสิทธิ์พิจารณาและตรวจแก้ต้นฉบับได้ตามที่เห็นสมควร พร้อมนี้ขอมอบลิขสิทธิ์ผลงานที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ให้แก่วารสารวนศาสตร์ คณะวนศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ กรณีมีการฟ้องร้องเรื่องการละเมิดลิขสิทธิ์เกี่ยวกับภาพ กราฟ ข้อความส่วนใดส่วนหนึ่ง หรือ ข้อคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในผลงาน ให้เป็นความรับผิดชอบของข้าพเจ้าและผู้เขียนร่วม (ถ้ามี) แต่เพียงฝ่ายเดียว และหากข้าพเจ้าและผู้เขียนร่วม (ถ้ามี) ประสงค์ถอนบทความในระหว่างกระบวนการพิจารณาของทางวารสาร ข้าพเจ้าและผู้เขียนร่วม (ถ้ามี) ยินดีรับผิดชอบค่าใช้จ่ายทั้งหมดที่เกิดขึ้นในกระบวนการพิจารณาบทความนั้น”
References
Anagnostou, M., Gunn, V., Nibbs, O., Muntaner, C., Doberstein, B. 2022. An international scoping review of rangers: precarious employment. Environment Systems and Decisions, 42: 479–503. doi: 10.1007/s10669–022–09845–3
Ariyaphithaka, C., Pongpattananurak, A., Pattanaviboolb, A., Podchongc S., Chankhao, A.2020. Applying SMART patrol database for creating species distribution model of Panthera tigris corbetti in Thailand western forest complex. Journal of Environmental Management, 16(2): 42–59. doi: 10.14456/jem.2020.10 (in Thai)
Critchlow, R., Plumptre, A.J., Alidria, B., Nsubuga, M., Driciru M., Rwetsiba, A., Wanyama, F., Beale C.M. 2016. Improving law–enforcement effectiveness and efficiency in protected areas using ranger–collected monitoring data. Conservation Letter, 10(5): 1–9. doi: 10.1111/conl.12288
Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP). 2017. SMART Patrol Techniques for Conservation Area Management. Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP). 2018.Tha Praya National Park Management Masterplan. Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP). 2021. Reports of Smart Patrol in TaPhraya National Park, September 2021. Office of 1stst. Area Administration Conservation (Prachinburi). Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP). 2022. Summary of Statistical Reports on Forest and Wildlife Cases of National Park Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department Years 2021. Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Snyderman, B. 1959. The Motivation to Work, 2nd ed. John Wiley. New Brunswick, U.S.A., and London, UK.
Maslow, A.H. 1954. Motivation and Personality. Harpers. Michigan, U.S.A.
Maneerat, S., Pattanavibool, A., Duengkae, P. 2016. Affecting SMART Patrol System Protection Efficiency on Endangered Species in HuaiKhaKhaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Master of Science and Program in Forest Resource and Environmental Administration. M.S. Thesis, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Saleepol, P. 2017. Guidelines for Increasing Working Efficiency to Reduce the Loss of Personnel of the Mobile Development Unit in 3 Southern Border Provinces Thailand. Thai National Defence College, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Thai Public Broadcasting Service. 2022. Reason for Termination 1,731 "Forest Rangers" Agree to Take a 25% Pay Cut. https://www.thaipbs.or.th/news/content/311633, 18 November 2022.
Wongwijit, M. 2020. Motivation Affecting Forest Ranger Performance: a Case Study of the Thaplan National Park. Forest Rangers. M.S. Thesis, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)