Comparison between Hormone and Porcine Follicular Fluid Secretion Supplements on In vitro Oocyte Maturation

Main Article Content

Nongnuch Gumlungpat
Mayuva Youngsabanant
Sukjai Rattanayuvakorn

Abstract

The aimed of the study to comparison between using porcine ovarian follicular fluid secretion and FSH, LH and estradiol and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) to supplement development of porcine oocytes cultured in the laboratory. Porcine ovarian follicular fluid secretion from Large Write Pigs’ medium-sized oocytes (4-6 mL) at concentrations of 200 and 500 µg protein/mL per porcine oocyte embraced by medium-sized oocytes cultured in the 37 oC sterile-conditioned thermos incubator with 5% high humidity and 95% CO2 in the atmosphere, supplemented by 2.2 mg/mL M199, 0.25 mM NaHCO3, 15 µg/mL and 50 µg/mL pyruvate as well as gentamicin sulfate. There were 4 groups: Group 1, oocytes cultured in M199; Group 2, oocytes cultured in M199 supplemented with hormones (LH, FSH and estradiol); Group 3, oocytes cultured in M199 supplemented with hormones and 10% HTFBS; and Group 4, oocytes cultured in M199 supplemented with fluid secretion from medium-sized porcine oocytes with 200 and 500 µm/mL protein concentrations. The result of cultures, performed for 24 and 44 h by measuring the diameter of oocytes which had sizing extension as growing, disclosed that the secretion from medium-sized oocytes with a 200 µg/mL concentration didn’t give an impact on the growth of surrounding cells, while that with a 500 µg/mL concentration did, leading to a significantly higher growth percentage than that of the positive control (supplemented by hormones and bovine serum), statistically. The surrounding cells extended and turned more fibroblastic than the positive control. This can be concluded that the secretion from medium-sized oocytes with a 500 µg/mL concentration was the most appropriate supplement to be used in the culture medium to assist oocyte development in place of costly hormones and bovine protein serum.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gumlungpat, N. ., Youngsabanant, M., & Rattanayuvakorn, S. . (2023). Comparison between Hormone and Porcine Follicular Fluid Secretion Supplements on In vitro Oocyte Maturation . Thai Journal of Science and Technology, 11(2), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.14456/tjst.2023.3
Section
วิทยาศาสตร์ชีวภาพ

References

Agung, B., Otoi, T., Fuchimoto, D., Senbon, S., Onishi, A., & Nagai, T. (2013). In Vitro Fertilization and Development of Porcine Oocytes Matured in Follicular Fluid. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 59(2), 103-106.

Alberto, R., Luisa Delle, P., Simona, C., Emanuela, M., Marco, M., & Paolo, R. (2009). Follicular fluid content and oocyte quality: from single biochemical markers to metabolomics. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 7,40 doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-40.

Areekijseree, M. & Vejaratpimol, R. (2006). In vivo and in vitro porcine oviductal epithelial cells, cumulus cell complexes and cumulus cells study: A scanning electron microscopy and inverted microscopy study. Micron, 37(8), 707-716.

Chang, S., Jones, J., Ellefson, R., & Ryan, R. (1976). The Porcine Ovarian Follicle: I. Selected Chemical Analysis of Follicular Fluid at Different Developmental Stages. Biology of reproduction, 15, 321-328.

Ducolomb, Y. Humberto, G. Reyna, F. Irma, J. Eduardo, C. Diana, F. Edmundo, B. Zayil, S. & Miguel, B. (2013). Effect of porcine follicular fluid proteins and peptides on oocyte maturation and their subsequent effect on in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology, 79, 896-904.

Huang, WT., Lu, SG., Tang, PC., Wu, SC., Cheng, SP., & Ju, JC. (2002). Biochemical compositions of follicular fluid and the effects of culture conditions on the In vitro development of pig oocytes. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 15(10), 1403-1411.

Ito, M., Iwata, H., Kitagawa, M., Kon, Y., Kuwayama, T., & Monji, Y. (2008). Effect of follicular fluid collected from various diameter follicles on the progression of nuclear maturation and developmental competence of pig oocytes. Animal Reproduction Science, 106, 421-430.

Lawrence, T., Ginzberg, R., Gilula, N., & Beers, W. (1979). Hormonally induced cell shape change in cultured rat ovarian granulosa cells. Journal of cell biology, 80, 21-36.

Leibfried, L., & First, N. (1980). Effect of Bovine and Porcine Follicular Fluid and Granulosa CellsonMaturation of Oocytes in vitro. Biology of reproduction, 23, 699-704.

Marchal, R., Vigneron, C., Perreau, C., Bali-Papp, A., & Mermillod, P. (2002). Effect of follicular size on meiotic and developmental competence of porcine oocytes. Theriogenology, 57, 1523-1532.

Motta, PM., Makabe, S., Naguro., &. T, Correr, S. (1994). Oocyte follicle cells association during development of human ovarian follicle. A study by high resolution scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Archives of Histology and Cytology, 57(4), 369-394

Rath, D., Niemannl, H., & Tao, T. (1995). In vitro maturation of porcine oocytes in follicular fluid with subsequent effects on fertilization and embryo yield in vitro. Theriogenology, 529-538.

Revelli, A., Piane, L., Casano, S., Molinari, E., Massobrio, M., & Rinaudo, P. (2009). Follicular fluid content and oocyte quality: from single biochemical markers to metabolomics. Reproductive biology and endocrinology, 1-13.

Spitzer, D., Murach, K., Lottspeich, F., Staudach, A., & Illmensee, K. (1996). Different protein patterns derived from follicular fluid of mature and immature human follicles. Human Reproduction, 11(4), 798-807.

Suchanek, E., Simunic, V., Juretic, D., & Grizelj, V. (1994). Follicular fluid contents of hyaluronic acid, follicle-stimulating hormone and steroids relative to the success of in vitro fertilization of human oocytes. Fertility Sterility, 62(2), 347-52.

Kimura, N., Konno, Y., Miyoshi, K., Matsumoto, H., & Sato, E. (2002). Expression of hyaluronan synthases and CD44 messenger RNAs in porcine cumulus-oocyte complexes during in vitro maturation. Biology of Reproduction, 66(3), 707-17.

Yokoo, M., & Sato, E. (2004). Cumulus-oocyte complex interactions during oocyte maturation. International review of cytology, 235, 251-29.

Yoshida, M., Ishizaki, Y., Kawagishi, H., & Bamba Kojima, Y. (1992a). Effects of pig follicular fluid on maturation of pig oocytes in vitro and on their subsequent fertilizing and developmental capacity in vitro. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 95, 481-488.

Youngsabanant, M., & Mettasart, M. (2020). Changes in secretory protein of porcine ampulla and isthmus parts of oviduct on follicular and luteal phases. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 42(4), 941-947.

Youngsabanant, M., Rabiab, S., Gumlungpat, N., & Panyarachun, B. (2019). In vitro characterization and viability of Vero cell lines supplemented with porcine follicular fluid (pFF) proteins study. Science Engineering and Health Studies, 13(3), 143-152.

Youngsabanant, M., & Rabiab, S. (2020). Potential Effect of porcine follicular fluid (pFF) from small-, medium-, and large-sized ovarian follicles on HeLa cell line viability. Science Engineering and Health Studies, 14(1), 141-151.

Zhao, Ch., Hashiguchi, A., Kondoh, K., Du, W., Hata, J., & Yamada, T. (2002). Exogenous Expression of Heat Shock Protein 90 kDa Retards the Cell Cycle and Impairs the Heat Shock Response. Experimental Cell Research, 275, 200-214.