Stomatal and Photosynthetic Response to Polyethylene Glycol Induced Drought Stress of Thai Jasmine Rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica cv. KDML105) during Vegetative Stage

Main Article Content

Wason Pannim
Cattleya Chutteang
Winai Utkhao
Siriphan Sukkhaeng
Somnuk Promdang
Suntaree Yingjajaval

Abstract

We examined the stomatal response and photosynthetic potential of Thai jasmine rice (KDML105) to induced increasing drought stress. Rice plants were grown in Yoshida’s nutrient solution for 50 days before subjected to 3 stepwise drought stress levels, each lasted for 7 days, by adding polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000) at 12.5, 22.5 and 35% (w/v), which lowered the osmotic potential of the nutrient solution to -300 (mild stress), -1,000 (moderate stress), and -2,800 (severe stress) kPa. At the end of each stress period, light response curve, maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm), and photosynthetic pigments content were measured on leaves of non-stressed and stressed plants. The increasing drought stress levels had definite effect in reducing stomatal conductance (gs), which then reduced the net (Pn) and the maximal gross photosynthetic rates (Pmax). Under mild and moderate drought stress, stomatal opening showed response in the limited range of light intensity (PPF) of 0-600 µmolPPF m-2s-1, beyond which stomatal conductance remained stable. When drought stress became severe, stomata closed and showed no response to the increasing PPF. The data on photosynthetic rate showed that the reduction under mild stress was mainly the result of reduced gs. Under moderate and severe drought stress, the reduction in photosynthesis was because of both stomatal and non-stomatal limitation, which included the reduction in gs, carboxylation efficiency (Pn/Ci), and quantum efficiency of PSII. In addition, severe drought stress caused damage to PSII and decrease in leaf chlorophyll content. The stepwise protocol in imposing drought stress can be used to induce the photosynthetic response mechanisms in KDML105 rice.

Article Details

Section
Research article

References

Amoah, J.N., C.S. Ko, J.S. Yoon and S.Y. Weon. 2019. Effect of drought acclimation on oxidative stress and transcript expression in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Plant Interact. 14(1): 492–505.

Arnon, D.I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 24(1): 1–15.

Basal, O., A. Szabó and S. Veres. 2020. Physiology of soybean as affected by PEG-induced drought stress. Curr. Plant Biol. 22: 100135.

Björkman, O. and B. Demmig. 1987. Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta. 170: 489–504.

Bunnag, S. and P. Pongthai. 2013. Selection of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars tolerant to drought stress at the vegetative stage under field conditions. Am. J. Plant Sci. 4: 1701–1708.

Bray, E.A. 1993. Molecular responses to water deficit. Plant Physiol. 103: 1035–1040.

Chen, Y.E., J.M. Cui, Y.Q. Su, C.M. Zhang, J. Ma, Z.W. Zhang, M. Yuan, W.J. Liu, H.Y. Zhang and S. Yuan. 2017. Comparison of phosphorylation and assembly of photosystem complexes and redox homeostasis in two wheat cultivars with different drought resistance. Sci.Rep. 7(1): 12718.

Deeba, F., A.K. Pandey, S. Ranjan, A. Mishra, R. Singh, Y.K. Sharma, P.A. Shirke and V. Pandey. 2012. Physiological and proteomic responses of cotton (Gossypium herbaceum L.) to drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 53: 6–18.

Flexas, J., J. Bota, J. Galme´s, H. Medrano and M. Ribas-Carbó. 2006. Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. Physiol. Plant. 127: 343–352.

Gang-shun, R., U. Ashraf, K. Lei-lei, M. Zhao-wen, X. Li-zhong, Z. Ke-you, F. Rasul and T. Xiang-ru. 2019. Low soil temperature and drought stress conditions at flowering stage affect physiology and pollen traits of rice. J. Integ. Agri. 18(8): 1859–1870.

Ghotbi-Ravandi, A.A., M. Shahbazi, M. Shariati and P. Mulo. 2014. Effects of mild and severe drought stress on photosynthetic efficiency in tolerant and susceptible barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 200(6): 403–415.

Kangkan, P. and A. Polthanee. 1996. Effect of water stress at different growth stages on growth and yield of Khao Dok Mali 105 rice variety. J. Agri. 12(3): 256–262. (in Thai)

Kasajima, I. 2017. Difference in oxidative stress tolerance between rice cultivars estimated with chlorophyll fluorescence analysis. BMC Research Notes. 10: 168.

Kasajima, I. 2019. Advances in Rice Research for Abiotic Stress Tolerance. MPS Ltd. Chennai, India. pp. 469–487.

Maroco, J.P., M.L. Rodrigues, C. Lopes and M.M. Chaves. 2002. Limitations to leaf photosynthesis in field-grown grapevine under drought-metabolic and modelling approaches. Funct. Plant Biol. 29: 451–459.

Murchie, E.H. and K. Niyogi. 2011. Manipulation of photoprotection to improve plant photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 155: 86–92.

Osório, M.L., J. Osório and A. Romano. 2013. Photosynthesis, energy partitioning, and metabolic adjustments of the endangered Cistaceae species Tuberaria major under high temperature and drought. Photosynthetica. 51(1): 75–84.

Ouyang, W., P.C. Struik, X. Yin and J. Yang. 2017. Stomatal conductance, mesophyll conductance, and transpiration efficiency in relation to leaf anatomy in rice and wheat genotypes under drought. J. Exp. Bot. 68(18): 5191–5205.

Pandey, V. and A. Shukla. 2015. Acclimation and tolerance strategies of rice under drought stress. Rice Sci. 22(4): 147–161.

Parida, A.K., V.S. Dagaonkar, M.S. Phalak, G.V. Umalkar and L.P. Aurangabadkar. 2007. Alterations in photosynthetic pigments, protein and osmotic components in cotton genotypes subjected to short-term drought stress followed by recovery. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 1: 37–48.

Pinheiro, C. and M.M. Chaves. 2011. Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? J. Exp. Bot. 62(3): 869–882.

Puteh, A.B., A.A. Saragih, M.R. Ismail and M.M.A. Mondal. 2013. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of cultivated (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica) and weedy rice (Oryza sativa L. var. nivara) genotypes under water stress. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 7(9): 1277–1283.

Shi, G., F. Zhu-Ge, Z. Liu and L. Le. 2014. Photosynthetic responses and acclimation of two castor bean cultivars to repeated drying–wetting cycles. J. Plant Interact. 9(1): 783–790.

Shukla, N., R.P. Awasthi, L. Rawat and J. Kumar. 2012. Biochemical and physiological responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as influenced by Trichoderma harzianum under drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 54: 78–88.

Teinseree, N., S. Yingjajaval and S. Chanprame. 2008. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters as indicators for water stress trait in sugarcane. Agricultural Sci. J. 39(2): 201–204. (in Thai)

Terzi, R. and A. Kadioglu. 2006. Drought stress tolerance and the antioxidant enzyme system in Ctenanthe setosa. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 48(2): 89–96.

Thornley, J.H.M. and I.R. Johnson. 1990. Plant and Crop Modeling. Oxford University Press, New York, USA. p. 213–242.

Tingting, X., S. Peixi and S. Lishan. 2010. Photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency of sweet sorghum under different watering regimes. Pak. J. Bot. 42(6): 3981–3994.

Utkhao, W., P. Eameaksuwan and S. Yingjajaval. 2016. Stomatal and photosynthetic responses of Eucalyptus camaldulensis to drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol. Agricultural Sci. J. 47(2): 149–161. (in Thai)

Utkhao, W. and S. Yingjajaval. 2015. Changes in leaf gas exchange and biomass of Eucalyptus camaldulensis in response to increasing drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol. Trees. 29: 1581–1592.

Valentini, R., D. Epron, P.D. Angelis, G. Matteucci and E. Dreyer. 1995. In situ estimation of net CO2 assimilation, photosynthetic electron flow and photorespiration in Turkey oak (Q. cerris L.) leaves: diurnal cycles under different levels of water supply. Plant Cell Environ. 18: 631–640.

Wang, Y., H. Lei, C. Xu and G. Chen. 2019. Long-term drought resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) during leaf senescence: a photosynthetic view. Plant Growth Regul. 88: 253–266.

Wang, Y.W., D.X. Jiang, J.J. Hou and G.X. Chen. 2019. Physiological characterization and thylakoid ultrastructure analysis in super high-yield hybrid rice leaves under drought stress. Photosynthetica. 57(3): 890–896.

Wang, Z., G. Li, H. Sun, L. Ma, Y. Guo, Z. Zhao, H. Gao and L. Mei. 2018. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and photosynthetic electron transport chain in young apple tree leaves. Biol. Open. 7(11): bio035279.

Wijewardana, C., F.A. Alsajri, J.T. Irby, L.J. Krutz, B. Golden, W.B. Henry, W. Gao and K.R. Reddy. 2019. Physiological assessment of water deficit in soybean using midday leaf water potential and spectral features. J. Plant Interact. 14(1): 533–543.

Xiong, Q., C. Cao, T. Shen, L. Zhong, H. He and X. Chen. 2019. Comprehensive metabolomics and proteomic analysis in biochemical metabolic pathways of rice spikes under drought and submergence stress. BBA - Proteins and Proteomics. 1867: 237–247.

Yoshida, S., D.A. Forno, J.H. Cock and K.A. Gomez. 1976. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. 3rd edition. International Rice Research Institute. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines. pp. 61–66.

Zhou, Y., H.M. Lam and J. Zhang. 2007. Inhibition of photosynthesis and energy dissipation induced by water and high light stresses in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 58(5): 1207–1217.