Evaluation of Yield Stability in Kamphaeng Saen Sugarcane Variety Series 2007

Main Article Content

Karnrawee Sripongpakapun
Rewat Lersrutaiyotin

Abstract

Evaluation of yield stability of multi–environment yield trial is important to selection and investigation yield potential of superior variety in plant breeding programs for suitable promotion in various sugarcane planting areas. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the potential and yield stability in plant cane of 10 Kamphaeng Saen sugarcane varieties with Khon Kaen 3 as checked variety. Trials were conducted for 14 locations in sugarcane planting areas following randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 3 replications. The plot had 3 rows with 8 meters in row length 1.5 meters of row space and 36 square meters of harvested areas. Data were analyzed using the combined analysis of variance and GGE biplot. The results revealed that cane yield, commercial cane sugar (CCS) and sugar yield had the highest effect on environments (46.11%, 34.24% and 38.94%, respectively), and had the lowest effects of genetic (6.30%, 12.36% and 11.67%, respectively). Effects of interaction between genetic and environment were 22.35% for cane yield, 25.74% for CCS and 27.56% for sugar yield. The GGE biplot analysis revealed that Kamphaeng Saen 07–29–1 had the same levels of cane yield, sugar yield and CCS as Khon Kaen 3. Furthermore, the evaluation of the specific outstanding varieties and locations revealed that both Kamphaeng Saen 07–29–1 and Khon Kaen 3 had specific locations for sugar yield. However, Kamphaeng Saen 07–29–1 showed outstanding stability in cane yield than Khon Kaen 3.

Article Details

Section
Research article

References

Authrapun, J., U. Lertsuchatavanich, S. Rungmekarat, P. Rajchanu–wong, P. Promchote, W. Jindaluang, P. Duangpatra, N. Samutthong, S. Tabngeon and J. Duangpatra. 2016. Yield stability analysis of multi–environment yield trials in peanut breeding lines, pp. 430–437. In Proc. the 54th Kasetsart University Annual Conference, 2–5 February 2016. (in Thai)

Buacheng, T. and R. Lersrutaiyotin. 2019. The evaluation of stability of Kamphaeng Saen sugarcane varieties series 2007 in ratoon cane by GGE evaluation. Journal of Science and Technology Kasetsart University. 8(2): 1–14. (in Thai)

Bull, J.K., D.M. Hogarth and K.E. Basford. 1992. Impact of genotype multiply environment interaction on response to selection in sugarcane. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 32(6): 731–737.

Crossa, J., P.L. Cornelius and W. Yan. 2002. Biplots of linear–bilinear models for studying crossover genotype × environment interaction. Crop Sci. 42: 619–633.

Eberhart, S.A. and W.A. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36–40.

Gauch, H.G. and R.W. Zobel. 1997. Identifying mega–environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37: 311–326.

International Rice Research Institute. 2014. Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research, STAR Version 2.0.1. Available Source: http://bbi.irri.org/products, June 8, 2021.

Jackson, P., S. Chapman, A. Rattey, X.M. Wei and M. Cox. 2007. Genotype × region interactions and implications for sugarcane breeding programs, pp. 122–130. In Proc. the 2007 Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 8–11 May 2007.

Jaisil, P. and J. Sanitchon. 2012. Evaluation of cane yield and agronomic traits of sugarcane series KKU 1999 under diverse agro–ecological zones. Khon Kaen Agr. J. 40(Suppl. 3): 45–52. (in Thai)

Jompuk, C. 2012. Statistics: Experimental Planning and Data Analysis in Plant Research with R. Kasetsart University Press, Bangkok. 336 pp. (in Thai)

Jompuk, C. 2016. Analytical Method for Quantitative Genetics in Plant Breeding: Working on R. Neo Digital Co., Ltd, Bangkok. 505 pp. (in Thai)

Kang, M.S. and J.D. Miller. 1984. Genotype x environment interactions for cane and sugar yield and their implications in sugarcane breeding. Crop Sci. 24(3): 435–440.

Luo, J., Z.H. Deng, Y.X. Que, Z.N. Yuan and R.K. Chen. 2012. Productivity and stability of sugarcane varieties in the 7th round national regional trial of China. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 18(5): 734–739.

Milligan, S.B., K.A. Gravois, K.P. Bischoff and F.A. Martin. 1990. Crop effects on genetic relationships among sugarcane traits. Crop Sci. 30(4): 927–931.

Nuttaro, S. and R. Lersrutaiyotin. 2020. Stability analysis of Kamphaeng Saen sugarcane variety series 2007 and 2008 using GGE biplot method in the central region. Journal of Science and Technology Kasetsart University. 9(3): 16–34. (in Thai)

Office of Agricultural Economics. 2021. Agricultural statistics of Thailand 2020. Available Source: http://www.oae.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/jounal/2564/yearbook2563.pdf, June 8, 2021. (in Thai)

Ponragdee, W., T. Sansayawichai, P. Sarawat, T. Moulanon, P. Kapetch and U. Leabwon. 2011. Khon Kaen 3 a sugarcane cultivar for the northeast. Thai Agric. Res J. 29(3): 283–301. (in Thai)

Puriya, J., W. Chamnanpa, P. Boodsiphum and A. Wongtamee. 2020. Evaluation of potential productivity between plant cane and the first ratoon of 16 sugarcane varieties grown in the sandy soil area in Phitsanulok province. Naresuan Agricultural Journal. 17(2): e0170205. (in Thai)

Putkao, J. 2005. Selection and Yield Trials of Sugarcane Hybrid Clones Suitable for Planting Season in Nakhon Ratchasima Province. MS Thesis, Kasetsart University, Bangkok. (in Thai)

R Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available Source: http://www.R–project.org, June 8, 2021.

Set–tow, S., P. Songsri, N. Jongrungklang and P. Jaisil. 2019. Evaluation of cane yield and agronomic traits of 16 sugarcane advance clones grown under rainfed conditions in northeastern region with different soil texture. Khon Kaen Agr. J. 47(4): 641–654. (in Thai)

Sooksathan, K. 1997. Sugarcane Production Handbook. Mitrphol Sugarcane Research Center Co., Ltd, Chaiyaphum. 63 pp. (in Thai)

Suriharn, B. and K. Lertrat. 2007. Multi–location trial of waxy corn varieties in Thailand. Khon Kaen Agr. J. 35(4): 469–476. (in Thai)

Thongviang, V., T. Buphasorn, D. Somrak, P. Phasook, S. Chaluthong, W. Sensai, P. Kokkan, S. Roobsom, O. Yatabe and K. Niimi. 2014. Comparative study of new U–thong sugarcane varieties and locally cultivated varieties in Kumphawapi district, Udon Thani province. Khon Kaen Agr. J. 42(2): 231–238. (in Thai)

Yan, W., L.A. Hunt, Q. Sheng and Z. Szlavnics. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega–environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40: 597–605.

Yan, W. 2001. GGEbiplot–a windows application for graphical analysis of multi–environment trial data and other types of two–way data. Agron J. 93: 111–118.

Yan, W., P.L. Cornelius, J. Crossa and L.A. Hunt. 2001. Two types of GGE biplot for studying analyzing multi–environment trial data. Crop Sci. 41: 656–663.

Yan, W. and M.S. Kang. 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. CRC Press, FL, USA. 288 pp.