Functional Snack Food

Authors

  • Onanong Naivikul Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
  • Pracha Boonyasirikool Institute of Food Research and Product Development, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
  • Duangchan Hengsawadi Institute of Food Research and Product Development, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
  • Kamolwan Jangchud Department of Product Development, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
  • Thongchai Suwansichon Department of Product Development, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
  • Anocha Suksomboo Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.

Keywords:

snack food, functional food, soy protein, rice bran

Abstract

The direct-expanded functional snack food could be produced using a formula being composed of 70% corn grit, 10.5% soy protein isolate, 4% full-fat soy flour, 10% inactivated full-fat rice bran, seasoning with barbecue flavor, as well as vitamins and iodine added to be accepted by the consumer test (120 persons) at the 7- point level of medium-like (9-point hedonic scale). The products showed 2.88 expansion ratio, 0.16 g/cm3 density, 73.96 newton hardness and 1.23 crispiness (Df). The chemical compositions showed that the barbecue flavor functional snack food contained 15.78% protein, 14.07% fat, 4.49% ash, 2.02% crude fiber and 5.86% dietary fiber. The nutritive values of this product calculated at 30 g/serving as Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) were 9.46% protein, 7.03% dietary fiber, 278.67% vitamin B1, 188.82% vitamin B2 and 31.4% iodine. The shelf-life stability was determined by packing the products in 2 types of packaging: thin and thick metalized polyethylene terephthalate (metalized PET), then stored at varied temperature (35°C and 55°C) for 8 weeks. The results showed that the high temperature (55°C) caused the physical properties, texture and taste-panel acceptance change more than the other. Thin metalized PET was the most suitable packaging to keep products within 8 weeks at 35°C. Moisture content (3.72 to 4.87%) and aw (0.25 to 0.32) were slightly increased. Thiobarbituric acid increased (0.20 to 3.24 mg/1000g). Hardness was not significantly different (P > 0.05) (84.52 to 90.65 newton), whereas Df slightly decreased (1.24 to 1.13). The chemical compositions of 8-week snack stored at 35°C as dry basis showed no significantly different values for protein (16.06%) and crude fiber (1.51%) from the control samples but had some different values for fat (9.81%), ash (4.11%) carbohydrate (68.51%) and dietary fiber (8.35%). The taste panel accepted the product similar to normal in the range of acceptance (score 8-9).

Downloads

Published

2002-03-31

How to Cite

Onanong Naivikul, Pracha Boonyasirikool, Duangchan Hengsawadi, Kamolwan Jangchud, Thongchai Suwansichon, and Anocha Suksomboo. 2002. “Functional Snack Food”. Agriculture and Natural Resources 36 (1). Bangkok, Thailand:44-54. https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/anres/article/view/242686.

Issue

Section

Research Article