Capability of cassava model to determine biomass of two branching types at different plant spacings

Authors

  • Anchalee Photangtham Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
  • Phanupong Phoncharoen Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
  • Nateetip Sawatraksa Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
  • Nakorn Jongrungklang Northeast Thailand Cane and Sugar Research Center, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
  • Sanun Jogloy Plant Breeding Research Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
  • Nimitr Vorasoot Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
  • Poramate Banterng Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand

Keywords:

Biomass, CSM–MANIHOT–Cassava, DSSAT, Planting, Simulation

Abstract

Importance of the work: Evaluation of the Cropping System Model (CSM)-MANIHOT-Cassava provides the opportunity to apply for determining the suitable plant spacings.
Objectives: This research aimed to show potential of the CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava in simulating biomass of two cultivars using different plant spacings.
Materials & Methods: The Rayong 9 (RY9, non-branching) and Kasetsart 50 (KU50, branching) cultivars were planted at spacings of 120 cm × 80 cm (10,418 plants/ha) and 120 cm × 100 cm (8,331 plants/ha). The data recorded were soil properties before planting, daily weather parameters, crop management details and crop dry weight.
Results: The average values for the index of agreement and for the normalized root mean square error (nRMSE) for biomass accumulation were 0.91 and 34.1%, respectively. For biomass at final harvest, the average nRMSE value was 31.0%. However, the results from both the simulation and field experiment identified the KU50 cultivar with spacing at 120 cm × 80 cm as desirable treatment for total crop dry weight. Model application in different scenarios showed that a wider plant spacing tends to produce a higher simulated storage root dry weight per area under irrigated growing conditions, while a narrower plant spacing tends to give higher simulated crop productivity under rainfed conditions.
Main finding: This research demonstrated the possibility of applying the CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava as an informative tool to help identify a suitable plant spacing for cassava.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-09

How to Cite

Photangtham, Anchalee, Phanupong Phoncharoen, Nateetip Sawatraksa, Nakorn Jongrungklang, Sanun Jogloy, Nimitr Vorasoot, and Poramate Banterng. 2022. “Capability of Cassava Model to Determine Biomass of Two Branching Types at Different Plant Spacings”. Agriculture and Natural Resources 56 (1). Bangkok, Thailand:73–84. https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/anres/article/view/253974.

Issue

Section

Research Article