Evaluation of Some Soil Properties Affecting Sugarcane Yield and CCS of Khon Kaen 3 (KK3) and LK 92-11 Varieties in Eastern Thailand

Main Article Content

Sawai Buddiwong
Pramote Pornsuriya
Supansa Chinaworn

Abstract

The evaluation of the effect of some soil factors on Commercial Cane Sugar (CCS) and the yield of sugarcane varieties Khon Kaen 3 and LK92-11 was conducted by testing these varieties in 15 planting areas across three provinces: Chonburi, Sa Kaeo, and Chachoengsao. Soil properties in each area were analyzed, including pH, electrical conductivity (EC), organic matter (OM), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg). CCS and yield per rai of sugarcane were measured after 12 months of growth. The variance analysis of multiple linear regression between the soil analysis and CCS as well as sugarcane yield was also performed. The results showed that the factors influencing the CCS of Khon Kaen 3 and LK92-11 sugarcane varieties grown in Chonburi, Sa Kaeo, and Chachoengsao were electrical conductivity, phosphorus, and organic matter content in the soil with the coefficient of determination (R2) for the Khon Kaen 3 variety was 0.64, while for the LK92-11 variety, it was 0.76. Factors influencing the yield of Khon Kaen 3 included magnesium and phosphorus, with an R2 = 0.51, while for LK92-11, the factors were electrical conductivity and phosphorus, with an R2 = 0.62. The increased yield was found to be positively correlated with the CCS values. Increasing organic matter in the soil by alternating organic fertilizers with chemical fertilizers is recommended as a method for maintaining electrical conductivity levels, increasing organic matter in the soil, and improving the availability of phosphorus in the soil.

Article Details

How to Cite
Buddiwong, S. ., Pornsuriya, P. ., & Chinaworn, S. (2025). Evaluation of Some Soil Properties Affecting Sugarcane Yield and CCS of Khon Kaen 3 (KK3) and LK 92-11 Varieties in Eastern Thailand . Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok Research Journal, 18(2), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.63271/rmuttorj.v18i2.266188
Section
Research article
Author Biographies

Sawai Buddiwong, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok

Department of Plant Production Technology, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok, Thailand

Pramote Pornsuriya, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok

Department of Plant Production Technology, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok, Thailand

Supansa Chinaworn, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok

Department of Plant Production Technology, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok

References

Calcino, D., Schroeder, B., Panitz, J., Hurney, A., & Wood, A. (2018). Australian sugarcane nutrition manual. Sugar Research Australia Limited.

Chawburee, K., Sangkhasila, K., Karuna, S. & Trakoonyingcharoen, P. (2021). Effect of Continuous Application of Organic Materials on Soil Water Retention Curve of Soils under Sugarcane Plantation. Thai Journal of Soils and Fertilizers, 39(1), 25-34. [in Thai]

De Whalley, H. C. S. (Ed.). (2013). ICUMSA methods of sugar analysis: Official and tentative methods recommended by the International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis (ICUMSA). Elsevier.

Department of Agriculture. (2010). A handbook of soil analysis: Chemical and physical methods. [in Thai]

Fageria, N. K., Baligar, V. C., & Jones, C. A. (1997). Growth and mineral nutrition of field crops (2nd Ed). Marcel Dekker.

Insuk, P., Amonpon, W., Pantu, M., & Nukaeo, K. (2023). Evaluation of yield and yield stability of U-Thong Cane Clones at different environments. Thai Agricultural Research Journal, 41(2), 129-141. [in Thai]

Kalapakdee, T., Lertruthaiyothin, R., & Songkrasin, A. (2015). Evaluation of environmental factors affecting cane yield and CCS in ratoon cane of Kamphaeng Saen Varieties Series. Science and Technology, 4(2), 1-13. [in Thai]

Khunpek, S., Lersrutaiyotin, R. & Songkrasin, A. (2016). Response of Kamphaeng Saen sugarcane varieties series 2007 in plant cane to soil texture, planting date, ages at harvesting and rainfall. Journal of Science and Technology Kasetsart University, 5(2), 45-56. [in Thai]

Luanmanee, S., Kongtien, D., Chongchuaklang, K., & Wandee, W. (2021). Effect of supplemental water and fertilizer rates on yield of three sugarcane cultivars grown on clay soil at Nakhon Sawan Province. Thai Agricultural Research Journal, 39(3), 232-247. [in Thai]

Luanmanee, S. (2024). Soil, fertilizer and water management for improving sugarcane productivity. DOA.

Nguyen, H. H., Maneepong, S., & Suraninpong, P. (2015, July 1-3). Behavior of nutrient uptake by pummelo growing on salt marsh soil. In Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Agricultural Technology, (pp. 101-105).

Office of the Cane and Sugar Board. (2024a). Report on situation sugarcane cultivation for production season 2023/2024. [in Thai]

Office of the Cane and Sugar Board. (2024b). Announcement of the preliminary price of sugarcane and returns production preliminary selling sugar of production season 2023/2024. [in Thai]

Pongthai, T., Onthong, J., & Khawmee, K. (2017). Effect of magnesium on Nutrient concentration and growth of rubber tree sapling. Journal of Agricultural Research and Extension, 34(1), 1-12. [in Thai]

Yates, R. A., & Taylor, R. D. (1986). Water use efficiencies in relation to sugarcane yields. Soil use and management, 2(2), 70-76.