Landscape Architecture for Creative Cultural Tourism Cities: Khung Samphao Subdistrict, Manorom District, Chai Nat Province

Main Article Content

Phanu Aiemtom
Yiampol Chotpunyatham
Parinya Nakpathom

Abstract

This study aims to assess the landscape architectural potential of the study area and to develop landscape design guidelines that promote the city as a creative cultural tourism destination. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating field surveys using mapping techniques, participant observation, and activity mapping, together with the collection of spatial coordinates of cultural and landscape resources through Global Positioning System (GPS) tools. Spatial data analysis is combined with a review of cultural capital–related literature and the interpretation of satellite imagery using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to synthesize area potential through the overlay of physical characteristics and perceptual dimensions. Design proposals are formulated with a focus on pilot areas in Khung Samphao Subdistrict, where tourism routes and landscape structures are developed as demonstrative interventions. The findings indicate that Manorom district holds significant potential for tourism route development, as reflected in the density of cultural resources, the continuity of riverfront and agricultural landscapes, and the capacity to spatially connect key sites through an integrated tourism network. Three types of creative cultural tourism routes are identified: (1) historical routes, (2) local agricultural livelihood routes, and (3) routes related to traditions and beliefs. Landscape design proposals in the pilot areas demonstrate the feasibility of enhancing public spaces to support recreation, learning, and tourism activities. The results underscore the importance of integrating landscape architectural knowledge with spatial and cultural data to strengthen urban identity and guide Manorom toward becoming a creative cultural tourism city. This study contributes an integrative framework that links spatial analysis, qualitative insights, and landscape design for community-based creative cultural tourism development, while the proposed design guidelines offer practical direction for agencies seeking to develop tourism areas aligned with local identity, cultural values, and long-term sustainability.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aiemtom, P., Chotpunyatham, Y. ., & Nakpathom, P. (2026). Landscape Architecture for Creative Cultural Tourism Cities: Khung Samphao Subdistrict, Manorom District, Chai Nat Province. Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok Research Journal, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.63271/rmuttorj.v19i1.270486
Section
Research article
Author Biographies

Phanu Aiemtom, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok

Department of Architectural and Environmental Design, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok

Yiampol Chotpunyatham, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok

Department of Architectural and Environmental Design, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok

Parinya Nakpathom, Faculty of International College, Burapha University

Department of Holistic Health and Wellness Management, Faculty of International College, Burapha University

References

Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1–2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002

Boonyobhas, A. (2019). Cultural landscapes and community-based tourism development in small-town contexts. Journal of Urban and Regional Planning, 34(1), 55–70.

Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

Campbell, J. B., & Wynne, R. H. (2011). Introduction to remote sensing (5th ed.). Guilford Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dankittikul, C. (2015). Spatial design for sustainable community development: The role of landscape architecture in reinforcing local identity. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 41(2), 23–38.

Designated Areas for Sustainable Tourism Administration (DASTA). (n.d.). Creating creative tourism toolkit. https://www.dasta.or.th/en/article/4271

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2017). Land use change and agriculture: Impacts and responses. FAO.

Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life. Island Press.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Hall, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2011). Urban and regional planning (5th ed.). Routledge.

Hayden, D. (1995). The power of place: Urban landscapes as public history. MIT Press.

Kim, S. S., & Ellis, G. D. (2015). Niche markets and creative tourism development. Tourism Geographies, 17(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2014.939575

Lambin, E. F., Geist, H. J., & Lepers, E. (2003). Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 205–241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105459

Landry, C. (2011). The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators (2nd ed.). Earthscan.

Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2015). Geographic information science and systems (4th ed.). Wiley.

Lynch, K. (1962). Site planning. MIT Press.

Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.

Ray, C. (1998). Culture, intellectual property and territorial rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 38(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00061

Richards, G., & Wilson, J. (2006). Developing creativity in tourist experiences: A solution to the serial reproduction of culture? Tourism Management, 27(6), 1209–1223.

Richards, G. (2011). Creativity and tourism: The state of the art. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1236–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.07.008

Smith, M. K. (2006). Tourism, culture and regeneration. CAB International.

Timothy, D. J., & Boyd, S. W. (2015). Tourism and trails: Cultural, ecological and management issues. Channel View Publications.

Tourism Authority of Thailand. (2017). Tourism enterprise plan of Thailand 2017–2021. https://api.tat.or.th/upload/policy_market_plan/live/Tourism_Enterprise_Plan_of_Thailand_2560-2564.pdf

Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.

UNESCO. (2006). Towards sustainable strategies for creative tourism. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001598/159811e.pdf

UNESCO. (2013a). Creative cities network: Mission statement. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://en.unesco.org/creative-cities

UNESCO. (2013b). Creative cities network: Towards sustainable urban development. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2013c). New life for historic cities: The historic urban landscape approach explained. UNESCO Publishing.

UN-Habitat. (2016). Urbanization and development: Emerging futures—World cities report 2016. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Project for Public Spaces.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.