Alternative Utilization of Private Floodplain Lands in the Chi River Oxbow Lakes through Lowland Floodplain Forest Restoration

Main Article Content

Chatchai Jothityangkoon
Chow Hirunteeyakul
Intareeya Sutthivanich
Udomvit Maneewan

Abstract

Economic development driven by the conversion of floodplain forests in the Mun and Chi River basins into agricultural land has resulted in the extensive degradation of native forest ecosystems and persistently low agricultural productivity. The unique geomorphological characteristics of these areas, seasonal inundation lasting 3 to 4 months with water depths ranging from 1 to 4 meters, have caused unsustainable agriculture productivity. Consequently, many private lands, particularly those around oxbow lakes of the Chi River have been abandoned. Furthermore, the progressive land and building tax rates applied to abandoned lands are substantially higher than those used for agriculture. To address this issue, this pilot study proposed the feasibility of three alternative land-use options: (1) allowing natural forest regeneration in a 15-year period, (2) establishing economic forest plantations through enrichment planting of native species based on ecological restoration principles, and (3) developing water storage ponds in addition to option (2), with forest plantations on the remaining land. The evaluation of alternative land-use options indicated that option (2) offered the greatest benefits for landowners. The multiple benefits included: (1) lower land taxes, (2) reinvestment of tax savings into forest restoration and initial maintenance costs for three years, (3) accession to existing nearby water resources, eliminating the need for a farm pond, (4) sustainable income for local communities through the restored forest, providing natural resources for flood material and energy, with no additional costs to the landowner after the third year, and (5) enhancement of carbon sequestration by trees in the lowland floodplain forests, benefiting the environment and enabling future carbon credits.

Article Details

Section
Research paper

References

Martin-Smith, K.M. 2004. Ecology | Aquatic habitats in forest ecosystem. In: Burley, J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Forest Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Chanpoon, A. 2023. Lowland Floodplain Forest, Lost Ecosystems. https://www.seub.or.th/bloging/knowledge/2023-131. Accessed 22 February 2025. (in Thai)

Phuphat, M. and et al. 2018. Lowland Floodplain Forest in the Northeast. Bangkok: Forest Herbarium, Forest and Plant Conservation Research Office, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation. (in Thai)

Ahmadzai, M.R. and et al. 2023. The societal and economic impact of reforestation strategies and policies in Southeast Asia - A review. Forests. 14(1): 1.

Khammongkol, K. and et al. 2013. Study of the social structure of the lowland floodplain forest in the Mun River Basin. Journal of Forestry. 32(Suppl.): 97-109. (in Thai)

Toyota Motor Corporation. 2016. Toyota launches Biodiversity & Sustainability Learning Center to complement its Biotope project in Thailand. https://global.toyota/en/detail/12564657. Accessed 19 March 2025. (in Thai)

Pacheco, P., Beatty, C. and Patel, J. 2024. Chapter 9 An economic view on the costs and benefits of forest restoration. In: Katila, P. and et al. (eds.) Restoring Forests and Trees for Sustainable Development: Policies, Practices, Impacts, and Ways Forward. Oxford: Oxford Academic.

Tedesco, A.M. and et al. 2022. The role of incentive mechanisms in promoting forest restoration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 378(1867): 20210088.

Sigma Hydro Consultant Co., Ltd., Khon Kaen University and SNT Consultant Co., Ltd. 2021. Environmental Assessment Study Project Strategic Level, Mun River Basin Area. https://sea.nesdc.go.th/sea_admin/images/project/reports/10/ไฟล์เล่มรายงาน%2010/4.pdf. Accessed 25 March 2025. (in Thai)

Forestry Research Group. 2013. Forest Planting Pattern Using Agroforestry System. Bangkok: Royal Forest Department. (in Thai)

Agarwood Plants (Thailand) Co., Ltd. 2025. Tree measurement and valuation. https://www.agarwoodapt.com/tree-measurement-and-valuation. Accessed 18 April 2025. (in Thai)

Dumrongrojwatthana, P. and et al. 2022. Learning Base: Carbon Credit. https://www.rspgchula.sc.chula.ac.th/activity/Udom_camp65/CHAPTER%202_%20Carbon%20Credit.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2025. (in Thai)

Agarwood Plants (Thailand) Co., Ltd. 2025. List of Trees That Can Be Used to Generate Carbon Credits in 2025. https://www.agarwoodapt.com/18100506/. Accessed 9 October 2025. (in Thai)

Greenhouse gas management organization (Public organization). 2025. Carbon Market. https://carbonmarket.tgo.or.th/. Accessed 18 April 2025. (in Thai)

Thai G garden. 2024. Thai G Rare Plant Breeding Center. https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100057523237976. Accessed 20 March 2025. (in Thai)

Budget Bureau. 2024. Unit Price Rate. https://www.bb.go.th/topic-detail.php?id=17209&mid=281&catID=0. Accessed 18 April 2025. (in Thai)

Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand. 1992. Surface Runoff and Specific Yield of River Basins in Thailand. Nonthaburi: Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand. (in Thai)

Royal irrigation department Thailand. 2009. The Study of Runoff Coefficient and Relation between Mean Annual Runoff of 25 River Basins in Thailand. Bangkok: Royal irrigation department Thailand. (in Thai)

Amatayakul, P. and Chomtha, T. 2014. Agriculture Meteorology to Know for Sri Saket. Bangkok: Meteorological Department. (in Thai)