Effects of Nutrient Supplement and Chitosan on Microbial Population Change in Up-Flow-Anaerobic-Sludge-Blanket Reactor during Biogas Production


  • Rungroj Piyaphanuwat Innovative Environmental Management and Smart Construction Material Laboratory, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (Ratchaburi Learning Park)
  • Srisuda Samaimai Department of Science and Environmental Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Dusit University
  • Vassanasak Limkhuansuwan Department of Urban and Industrial Environment, Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Dusit University


Up-flow-anaerobic-sludge-blanket reactor, Nutrient supplement, Chitosan, Microbial population, 16S rRNA


The objective of this research was to study the effects of nutrient supplement and chitosan on microbial change in an up-flow-anaerobic-sludge-blanket (UASB) reactor during biogas production. Three UASB reactors were operational in this study. All reactors were operated by feeding dilute stillage with chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration at 10,000 mg/L and 9 days of hydraulic retention time (HRT) under anaerobic conditions. Reactor 2 and reactor 3 were supplemented with nutrient supplement and chitosan, respectively. The results of the environment and pH values of all UASB reactors showed similar conditions with total volatile acid/ alkalinity (TVA/Alk) values of 0.27-0.31. The COD removal efficiency of reactor 1 (stillage), 2 (stillage and nutrient supplement) and 3 (stillage and chitosan) showed about 79%, 84% and 87%, respectively. In addition, it was found that the UASB reactors supplemented with nutrient supplement or chitosan produced higher levels of biogas than those without additives. The 16S rRNA technique by PCR reaction showed that the dominant archaea in the final fermentation of all UASB reactors and in inoculum sample were hydrogenotrophic (genus Methanobacterium) and acetotrophic methanogens (genus Methanosaeta). The methanogens population in the reactor supplemented with chitosan (18.11%) produced more biogas than the ones in the reactor supplemented with nutrient supplement (14.44%) and in the control reactor (15.95%).


Download data is not yet available.


Ableling, U., & Seyfried, C.F. (1992). Anaerobic-aerobic treatment of high-strength ammonium wastewaternitrogen removal via nitrite. Water Science Technology, 26(5-6), 1007-1015.

American public health association (APHA). (2012). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21st ed.). Washington, DC: American public health association/American water works association/water environment federation.

Burns, A.S., Pugh, C.W., Segid, Y.T., Behum, P.T., & Lefticariu, L. (2012). Performance and microbial community dynamics of a sulfate-reducing bioreactor treating coal generated acid mine drainage. Biodegradation, 23, 415-429.

Chao, A. (1984). Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 11, 265-70.

Dogan, T., Ince, O., Ayman Oz, N., & Kasapgil, B. (2005) Inhibition of volatile fatty acid production in granular sludge from a UASB reactor. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A 40(3), 633-644.

Edgas, R.C., Haas, B.J., Clemente, J.C., Quince, C., & Knight, R. (2011). UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics, 27(16), 2194-2200.

Esquivel-Elizondo, S., Ilhan, Z.E., Garcia-Pe, E.I., & KrajmalnikBrowna, R. (2017). Insights into butyrate production in a controlled fermentation system via gene predictions. Applied Environmental Science, 2(4), 1-7.

Feng, X.M., Karlssonl, A., Svensson1, B.H., & Bertilsson, S. (2010). Impact of trace element addition on biogas production from food industrial waste-linking process to microbial communities. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 74, 226-240.

Granada, C.E., Hasan, C., Marder, M., Konrad, O., Vargas, L.K., Passaglia, L.M., ... Sperotto, R.A. (2018). Biogas from slaughterhouse wastewater anaerobic digestion is driven by the archaeal family Methanobacteriaceae and bacterial families Porphyromonadaceae and Tissierellaceae. Renewable Energy, 118, 840-846.

Jijai, S., Srisuwan, G., O-thong, S., Ismail, N., & Siripatana, C. (2015). Effect of granule sizes on the performance of up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors for cassava wastewater treatment. Energy Process, 79, 90-97.

Karakashev, D., Batstone, D.J., Trably, E., & Angelidaki, I. (2006). Acetate oxidation is the dominant methanogenic pathway from acetate in the absence of methanosaetaceae. Apply Environment Microbiology, 72, 5138-5141.

Karlsson, A., Björn, A., Yekta, S.S., & Svensson, B.H. (2014). Improvement of the biogas production process (Master thesis). Linköping University, Sweden: Biogas research center.

Kaseamchochoung, C., Lertsutthiwong, P., & Phalakornkule, C. (2006). Influence of chitosan characteristics and environmental conditions on flocculation of anaerobic sludge. Water Environment Research, 78, 1061-4303.

Khemkhao, M., Nuntakumjorn, B., Techkarnjanaruk, S., & Phalakornkule, C. (2011). Effect of chitosan on UASB treating POME during a transition from mesophilic to thermophilic conditions. Bioresource Technology, 102(7), 4674-4681.

Kiran, E.U., Stamatelatou, K., Antonopoulou, G., & Lyberatos, G. (2016). Production of biogas via anaerobic digestion. In Handbook of Biofuels Production (pp. 259-301). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.

Kobayashi, T., Hu, Y., & Xu, K.Q. (2018). Impact of cationic substances on biofilm formation from sieved fine particles of anaerobic granular sludge at high salinity. Bioresource Technology, 257, 69-75.

Kurade, M.B., Saha, S., Kim, J.R., Roh, H.-S., & Jeon, B.H. (2020). Microbial community acclimatization for enhancement in the methane productivity of anaerobic co-digestion of fats, oil, and grease. Bioresource Technology, 296, 1222-1294.

Langer, S.G., Gabris, C., Einfalt, D., Wemheuer, B., Kazda, M., & Bengelsdorf, F.R. (2019). Different response of bacteria, archaea and fungi to process parameters in nine full-scale anaerobic digesters. Microbial Biotechnology, 12, 1210-1225.

Lee, A.H., & Nikraz, H. (2015). BOD: COD ratio as an indicator for river pollution. international proceedings of chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, 88, 89-94.

Lee, K. C.-Y., Morgan, X.C., Dunfield, P.F., Tamas, I., McDonald, I.R., & Stott, M.B. (2014). Genomic analysis of Chthonomonas calidirosea, the first sequenced isolate of the phylum armatimonadetes. The ISME Journal, 8, 1522-1533.

Lertsitthichai, S. (2006). Effect of chitosan on efficiency of the septic tank system, anaerobic sludge layer process, up-flow type (Master thesis). Bangkok: King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok.

Lozupone, C., Lladser, M.E., Knights, D., Stombaugh, J., & Knight, R. (2011). Unifrac: An effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. The ISME Journal, 5, 169-172.

Nsair, A., Cinar, S. O., Alassali, A., Qdais, H.A., & Kuchta, K. (2020). Operational parameters of biogas plants: A review and evaluation study. Journal of Energy, 13 (3761), 2-27.

Owusu-Agyeman, I., Plaza, E., & Cetecioglu, Z. (2020). Wastewater to energy: Relating granule size and biogas production of UASB reactors treating municipal wastewater. In Frontiers in Water-Energy-Nexus-Nature-Based Solutions, Advanced Technologies and Best Practices for Environmental Sustainability (pp. 317-320). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Pachiega, R., Rodrigues, M.F., Rodrigues, C.V., Sakamoto, I.K, Maria Bernadete, A. Varesche, M.B.A., ... Maintinguer, S.I. (2019). Hydrogen bioproduction with anaerobic bacteria consortium from brewery wastewater. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44, 155-163.

Pampillón-González, L., Ortiz-Cornejo, N.L., Luna-Guido, M., Dendooven, L., & Navarro-Noya, Y.E. (2017). Archaeal and bacterial community structure in an anaerobic digestion reactor (Lagoon type) used for biogas production at a pig farm. Journal Microbiol Biotechnology, 27, 306-317.

Pooltawee, J. (1994). Effect of volatile organic acids on microorganisms related to Biogas production (Master thesis). Bangkok: King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok.

Pyzik, A., Ciezkowska, M., Krawczyk, P.S., Sobczak, A., Drewniak, L., Dziembowski, A., & Lipinski, L. (2018). Comparative analysis of deep sequenced methanogenic communities: identification of microorganisms responsible for methane production. Microbial Cell Factories, 97, 1-16.

Ren, J., Yuan, X., Li, J., Ma, X., Zhao, Y., & Zhu, W. (2014). Performance and microbial community dynamics in a two-phase anaerobic co-digestion system using cassava dregs and pig manure. Bioresource Technology, 155, 342-351.

Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C., & Mahé, F. (2016). VSEARCH: A versatile open-source tool for metagenomics. Peer Journal, 4, e2584.

Shannon, C.E. (1984). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technology Journal, 27, 623-56.

Smolder, G.J.F., van der Meij, J., Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., & Heijnen, J.J. (1995). Model of the anaerobic metabolism of the biological phosphorus removal process: stoichiometry and pH influence. Biotechnology Bioengineering, 43, 46-470.

Speece, R.E. (1996). Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewaters. Archae Press: Nashville, Tennessee.

Su, X., Zhao, W., & Xia, D. (2018). The diversity of hydrogenproducing bacteria and methanogens within an in-situ coal seam. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 11(245), 1-18.

Tiwari, M.K. (2005). Enhanced granulation by natural ionic polymer additives in UASB reactor treating lowstrength wastewater. Water Research, 39(16), 3801-3810.

Torres, K. (2018). Granulation and microbial community dynamics in the chitosan-supplemented anaerobic treatment of wastewater polluted with organic solvents. Water Research, 10, 376-387.

Udomsinrot, K. (2000). Environmental Technology Management (Master thesis). Bangkok: Rangsit University.

Verbyla, M.E., Oakley, S.M., & Mihelcic, J.R. (2013). Wastewater infrastructure for small cities in an urbanizing world: Integrating protection of human health and the environment with resource recovery and food security. Environment Science Technology, 47, 3598–3605.

Wu, B., Wang, X., Deng, Y.Y., He, X.L., Li,Z. W., Li, Q., ... Yin, X.B. (2016). Adaption of microbial community during the start-up stage of a thermophilic anaerobic digester treating food waste. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 80(10), 2025-2032.

Xu, H., Liu, Y., Gao, Y., Li, F., Yang, B., Wang, M., ... Sand, W. (2018). Granulation process in an expanded granular sludge blanket (EGSB) reactor for domestic sewage treatment: impact of extracellular polymeric substances compositions and evolution of microbial population. Bioresource technology, 269, 153-161.

Zhang, J., Loh, K.-C., Lee, J., Wang, C.-H., Dai, Y., & Tong, Y.W. (2017). Three-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and horse manure. Scientific Reports, 7, 1-10.

Zou, J., Yu, F., Pan, J., Pan, B., Wu, S., Qian, M., & Li, J. (2021). Rapid start-up of an aerobic granular sludge system for nitrogen and phosphorus removal through seeding chitosan-based sludge aggregates. Science of The Total Environment, 762, 144171.




How to Cite

Piyaphanuwat, R., Samaimai, S., & Limkhuansuwan, V. (2023). Effects of Nutrient Supplement and Chitosan on Microbial Population Change in Up-Flow-Anaerobic-Sludge-Blanket Reactor during Biogas Production. Journal of Food Health and Bioenvironmental Science, 14(2), 1–11. Retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sdust/article/view/260586



Original Articles