Performance of Multiplex Real-time PCR and abTES™ MTB qPCR Kit for the Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex from Formalin-fixed, Paraffin Embedded Tissue

Main Article Content

Sirirat Seekhuntod
Paninee Thavarungul

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is a common infectious disease and a serious public health problem in Thailand. The causative agents of TB are a group of closely related bacteria known as the M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC). Nevertheless, MTBC detection using the conventional polymerase chain reaction (C-PCR) assay is complicated, time-consuming, and thus unsuitable for mass screening. A faster multiplex real-time PCR (M-real-time PCR) assay has been developed to help us overcome these problems. The present study aimed to establish the M-real-time PCR assay for MTBC detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues that showed histomorphology suspected of tuberculous infection and compare the results with that of the abTES™ MTB qPCR Kit assay. Two hundred and thirteen FFPE tissue samples were collected from the Department of Medical Services, Institute of Pathology. DNA was extracted, and MTBC assays were performed using the abTESTM MTB qPCR kit and the developed M-real-time-PCR method. The results showed that M-real-time-PCR was more sensitive for detecting M. tuberculosis complex than abTESTM MTB qPCR kit. 62 samples (29.11%) were positive for TB-DNA by M-real-time-PCR, and 59 samples (27.70%) were positive for TB-DNA by abTESTM MTB qPCR kit. The comparison between these two methods by kappa analysis showed an excellent agreement (K=0.965, 95% CI 0.927-1.000). The M-real-time PCR assay for detection MTBC at the minimum DNA concentration of 5 ng/μl. In addition, the M-Real-time PCR assay used only 2 hours and a lower cost of 350 baht per 1 sample. In conclusion, M-real-time-PCR is a high-sensitivity, simple, and faster method for detecting M. tuberculosis complex infection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue.

Article Details

Section
Medical Sciences

References

Zaman K. Tuberculosis: a global health problem. J Health Popul Nutr. 2010;28(2):111-3.

WHO. Global tuberculosis report 2019 [Internet]. WHO. World Health Organization; [cited 2022 Feb 15]. Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/

Inoue M, Tang WY, Wee SY, Barkham T. Audit and improve! Evaluation of a real-time probe-based PCR assay with internal control for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology. 2011;30(1):131-5.

Nakiyingi L, Kateete DP, Ocama P, Worodria W, Sempa JB, Asiimwe BB, et al. Evaluation of in-house PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:487-98.

Wang HY, Lu JJ, Chang CY, Chou WP, Hsieh JC. Development of a high sensitivity TaqMan-based PCR assay for the specific detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in both pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens.2019;9(1):113-9.

Hansen WL, Beuving J, Bruggeman CA, Wolffs PF. Molecular probes for diagnosis of clinically relevant bacterial infections in blood cultures. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2010;48(12):4432-8.

Lee HS, Park KU, Park JO, Chang HE, Song J, Choe G. Rapid, sensitive, and specific detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by real-time PCR on paraf-fin-embedded human tissues. J Mol Diagn. 2011;13(4):390-4.

Thakur R, Sarma S, Goyal R. Comparison of DNA Extraction Protocols for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis by Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction. J Glob Infect Dis. 2011;3(4):353-6.

Sirirat Seekhuntod, Paninee Thavarungkul. Detection of M. tuberculosis complex detection in formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue by Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay. Archives of Allied Health Sciences 2021;33(3):1-8

Singh HB, Singh P, Jadaun GP, Srivastava K, Sharma VD, Chauhan DS, et al. Simultaneous use of two PCR systems targeting IS6110 and MPB64 for confirmation of diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis. The Journal of communicable diseases. 2006;38(3):274-9.

Chantranuwat C, Assanasen T, Shuangshoti S, Sampatanukul P. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in papanicolaou-stained fine needle aspirated smears for diagnosis of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis. The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health. 2006;37(5):940-7.

Miyata A, Yokoyama C, Ihara H, Bandoh S, Takeda O, Takahashi E, Tanabe T. Characterization of the human gene (TBXAS1) encoding thromboxane synthase. Eur J Biochem. 1994 Sep 1;224(2):273-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033. 1994.00273.x. PMID: 7925341.

Kohlmorgen B, Elias J, Schoen C. Improved performance of the artus Mycobacterium tuberculosis RG PCR kit in a low incidence setting: a retrospective monocentric study. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):14127-38.

Perry MD, White PL, Ruddy M. Potential for use of the Seegene Anyplex MTB/NTM real-time detection assay in a regional reference laboratory. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2014;52(5):1708-10.

Gurvich OL, Skoblov M. Real-Time PCR and Multiplex Approaches. In: O'Driscoll L, editor. Gene Expression Profiling: Methods and Protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2011. p. 1-13.

Seekhuntod S, Thavarungkul P, Chaichanawongsaroj N. Validation of a Multiplex Allele-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of KRAS Gene Mutations in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues from Colorectal Cancer Patients. PloS one. 2016;11(1):e0147672.

Rao X, Lai D, Huang X. A new method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis. J Comput Biol. 2013;20(9):703-11.

Blast. Necleotide blast [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Feb 12]. Available from:https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgiPAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch.

Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360-3.

Gilbert MT, Haselkorn T, Bunce M, Sanchez JJ, Lucas SB, Jewell LD, et al. The isolation of nucleic acids from fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues-which methods are useful when? PloS one. 2007;2(6):e537.

Dietrich D, Uhl B, Sailer V, Holmes EE, Jung M, Meller S, et al. Improved PCR performance using template DNA from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues by overcoming PCR inhibition. PloS one. 2013;8(10):e77771.

Ludyga N, Grunwald B, Azimzadeh O, Englert S, Hofler H, Tapio S, et al. Nucleic acids from long-term preserved FFPE tissues are suitable for downstream analyses. Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology. 2012;460(2):131-40.