Effect of Forchlorfenuron and Boric Acid on Flower Bud Initiation of Table Grape

Main Article Content

Puritus Kongboonsuk
Warin Suton
Orapin Saritnum
Chinnapan Thanarut

Abstract

     Grapes can grow well in all climates. However, after pruning, there is often a problem of non-simultaneous bud breakage. Therefore, hydrogen cyanamide is often used (the commercial bud-breaking agent). However, it is a substance that is dangerous to users and is highly toxic. Therefore, the effects of Forchlorfenuron (CPPU) and boron (boric acid) on the stimulation of flower bud break of grape ‘Gold Bailey A’ were investigated to compare with 2.5% of hydrogen cyanamide. The results showed that hydrogen cyanamide at 2.5 percent gave the highest bud break percentage of 30.0 percent, which was not significantly different from CPPU at 10 mg/L with bud break percentages of 16.6 percent. CPPU at 10 mg/L also gave the highest flower bud percentage of 10.6 percent without significant differences found when compared to hydrogen cyanide and boric acid at 1,000 mg/L (9 and 8.3 percent of flower bud percentages, respectively). For the fruit set, CPPU 10 mg/L showed the highest fruit set at 13.3 percent. CPPU 10 mg/L and boric acid 1,000 mg/L can be used as the stimulating substances for flower buds and replace toxic substances (hydrogen cyanamide) that are harmful to grape farmers. Furthermore, using CPPU and boric acid can reduce costs by up to 4.75percent (35.4 baht) and 4.7 percent (35.85 baht), respectively, when compared to using hydrogen cyanamide (per liter of water mixing rate).

Article Details

How to Cite
Kongboonsuk, P., Suton, W., Saritnum, O., & Thanarut, C. (2025). Effect of Forchlorfenuron and Boric Acid on Flower Bud Initiation of Table Grape . Maejo Journal of Agricultural Production, 7(3), 129–139. retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/japmju/article/view/263411
Section
Research Article

References

Abd-Allah, A.S.E. 2006. Effect of spraying some macro and micronutrients on fruit-set, yield and fruit quality of Washington Navel orange trees. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2(11): 1059-1063.

Alva, O., R.N Roa-Roco, R. Perez-Diaz, M. Yanez, J. Tapia, Y. Moreno, S. Ruiz-Lara and E. Gonzalez. 2015. Pollen morphology and boron concentration in floral tissues as factors triggering natural and GA induced parthenocarpic fruit development in grapevine. PLoS ONE, 10(10): e0139503. Available: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139503.

Aragao, V.P.M., Y.R.S. Ribeiro, R.S. Reis, A.F. Macedo, E.I.S. Floh, V. Silveira and C. Santa-Catarina. 2016. In vitro organogenesis of Cedrela fissilis Vell. (MELIACEAE): The involvement of endogenous polyamines and carbohydrates on shoot development. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 124: 611-620. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0919-8.

Assad, S.A. 2013. Effect of CPPU on fruit set, drop, yield and fruit quality of ‘Hollywood’ and ‘Santarosa’ plum cultivars. Egyptian Journal of Horticulture 40(2): 187-204. Available: https://doi.org/10.21608/EJOH.2013.1343.

Chang, E., N. Deng, J. Zhang, J. Liu, L. Chen, X. Zhao, M. Abbas, Z. Jiang and S. Shi. 2018. Proteome-level analysis of metabolism-and stress-related proteins during seed dormancy and germination in Gnetum parvifolium. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 66(11): 3019-3029. Available: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05001.

Erez, A. and B. Lavi. 1984. Breaking bud rest of several deciduous fruit tree species in the Kenyan Highlands. African Symposium on Horticulturae Crops 158: 239-248. Available: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1985.158.29.

Hanson, E. J. 1991. Sour Cherry trees respond to foliar boron applications. HortScience 26(9): 1142-1145. Available: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.26.9.1142.

Jaidee, S. 2010. Effects of growth regulators on yield and quality of table grapes in tropic humidity. Master’s Thesis in Crop Production Technology, Suranaree University of Technology. [in Thai]

Khayyat, M., E. Tafazoli, S. Eshghi and S. Rajaee. 2007. Effect of nitrogen, boron, potassium and zinc sprays on yield and fruit quality of date palm. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 2(3): 289-296.

Lertwattanakiat, S. 2018. Manual of principles for vineyard management. Horticulture Research Institute, Department of Agriculture. [in Thai]

Lombard, P.J., N.C. Cook and D.U. Bellstedt. 2006. Endogenous cytokinin levels of table grape vines during spring budburst as influenced by hydrogen cyanamide application and pruning. Scientia Horticulturae 109(1): 92-96. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.02.021.

Mengel, K. and E. A. Kirkby. 1987. Principles of plant nutrition. International Potash Institute Bern, Switzerland.

Mohamed, A.K.A. 2008. The effect of chilling defoliation and hydrogen cyanamide on dormancy release, bud break and fruiting of Anna apple cultivar. Scientia Horticulturae 118(1): 25-32. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.05.015.

Mohamed, H. B., A. Zrig and H. Khemira. 2013. Effect of date of spraying CPPU (Sitofex) on fruit quality of ‘Meski’ table grapes. Food Global Science 7(1): 41-43.

Or, E., I. Vilozny, Y. Eyal and A. Ogrodovitch. 2000. The transduction of the signal for grape bud dormancy breaking induced by hydrogen cyanamide may involve the SNF-like protein kinase GDBRPK. Plant Molecular Biology 43: 483-494. Available: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006450516982.

Pattamas, T. and S. Nilsamranchit. 2009. Effects of branch girdling and Hydrogen cyanamide on bud break and fruit quality of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa C. F. Liang et. A. R. Ferguson). Journal Agricultural Science 25(3): 191-200. [in Thai]

Rehman, M.K.U., W. Wang, H. Zheng, M. Faheem, S. Iqbal, Z. G. Shen and J. Tao. 2020. Role of hydrogen cyanamide (HC) in grape bud dormancy. 3 Biotech 10: 1-9. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02194-5.

Sharafi, Y. and M. Raina. 2020. Effect of boron on pollen attributes in different cultivars of Malus domestica L. National Academy Science Letters 44(3): 189-194. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-020-00986-0.

Shulman, Y., G. Nir and S. Lavee. 1986. Oxidative process in bud dormancy and the uses of hydrogen cyanamide in breaking dormancy. Acta Horticulturae 179(11): 141-148. Available: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1986.179.11.

Souza, F.B.M.D., R. Pio, M. H. Tadeu, C. R. Zambon and G. Reighard. 2017. Boric acid in germination of pollen grains and fruit set of peach cultivars in subtropical regions. Revista Ciencia Agronomica 48(3): 496-500. Available: https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20170058.

Srinivasan, C. and M.G. Mullins. 1981. Physiology of flowering in the grapevine: A review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 32(1): 47-63. Available: https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1981.32.1.47.

Surasak, N. and S. Thakhieo. 1999. Grape’s cultivation. Pomology pamphlet, 2nd Edition, Royal project foundation. [in Thai]

Zabadal, T.J. and M. J. Bukovac. 2006. Effect of CPPU on fruit development of selected seedless and seeded grape cultivars. HortScience 41(1): 154-157. Available: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.41.1.154.