Assessing the efficiency of a mobile application in reading hematocrit compared to the manual method and automated blood cell analyzer
Keywords:
Hematocrit, Application, Packed red blood cell volumeAbstract
The measurement of packed red cell volume, or hematocrit, remains a widely used method for screening anemia and monitoring treatment across various patient groups. The standard method for hematocrit measurement is the microhematocrit technique, which is simple, convenient, low-cost, and requires only a small blood sample. However, this method has limitations, particularly when the operator lacks proficiency in reading the hematocrit level especially in individuals with visual impairments. Moreover, in high-volume testing scenarios, manual reading and reporting errors may occur. Recognizing these challenges, the researchers developed a mobile phone application to assist in reading hematocrit values. The study evaluated the application's accuracy using blood samples adjusted to hematocrit levels in three ranges: 20–25%, 40–45%, and 60–65%. The coefficient of variation (%CV) for the application readings in these three ranges was found to be 0.9, 1.3, and 0.8, respectively. The accuracy values were -2.4%, -2.1%, and -2.2%, respectively. A total of 171 samples were tested and compared using the microhematocrit method, an automated hematology analyzer, and the mobile application (in both automatic and manual modes). The correlation coefficients for these comparisons were 0.990, 0.990, 0.974, 0.973, 0.992, and 0.981, indicating a high level of correlation. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) further confirmed high consistency, with values of 0.995, 0.995, 0.987, 0.986, 0.996, and 0.990 (P < 0.001). Additionally, the application was capable of measuring hematocrit in turbid samples and those with red cell hemolysis up to grade 4+. User satisfaction among those who tested the application was rated as good (mean score of 4.43 ± 0.64). In conclusion, this mobile application can serve as an effective alternative to standard microhematocrit methods and automated hematology analyzers, particularly in settings with limited laboratory equipment.
References
The Thai Society of Hematology. Self-interpretation of complete blood count results [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 28]. Available from: http://www.tsh.or.th/Knowledge/Details/34. (In Thai)
Erythrocytosis [Internet]. Cleveland Clinic; 2022 [cited 2025 Apr 8]. Available from: https://my-clevelandclinic-org.translate.goog/health/diseases/23468.
Bull BS, Fujimoto K, Houwen B, Klee G, van Hove L, van Assendelft OW, et al. International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) recommendations for “surrogate reference” method for the packed cell volume. Lab Hematol [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2022 Oct 2];9(1):1–9. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=b450bdb0a58a54bae00e81f7e670b413e47a795c.
CLIA Acceptable Test Performance Criteria [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 27]. Available from: http://www.clinlabnavigator.com/clia-acceptable-test-performance-criteria.html.
Ngamman S. Evaluation of CBC analysis performance using Sigma metric of Sysmex XT2000i automated hematology analyzer at Charoenkrung Pracharak Hospital (Research report). Bangkok: Charoenkrung Pracharak Hospital; 2014. (In Thai)
Oosterhuis WP. Gross overestimation of total allowable error based on biological variation. Clin Chem 2011;57(9):1334-6. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.165308. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/clinchem/article/57/9/1334/5620979?login=false.
Visual grading for serum and plasma. Color images [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 27]. Available from: www.liebertpub.com/bio.
Lipemic images – Browse stock photos, vectors, and videos [Internet]. Adobe Stock. [cited 2025 Feb 7]. Available from: https://stock.adobe.com/th/search?k=lipemic. (In Thai)
Asst. Prof. Surapong Kongsat and Thirachart Thamwong. Determining the content validity of questionnaires (IOC) [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2023 Feb 28]. Available from: https://www.mcu.ac.th/article/detail/14329. (In Thai)
Index of Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 28]. Available from: https://www.sites.google.com/site/prapasara/26?tmpl=%2Fsystem%2Fapp%2Ftemplates%2Fprint%2F&showPrintDialog=1.
Gebretsadkan G. The comparison between microhematocrit and automated methods for hematocrit determination. Int J Blood Res Disord [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2022 Oct];2(1). Available from: https://clinmedjournals.org/articles/ijbrd/ijbrd-2-012.pdf.
Foxbith. 10 most popular programming languages in 2024 [Internet]. Bangkok: Foxbith; 2024 Feb 8 [cited 2024 Sep 7]. Available from: https://www.foxbith.com/blog/languages-for-software-development. (In Thai)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 University of Phayao

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ผู้นิพนธ์ต้องรับผิดชอบข้อความในบทนิพนธ์ของตน มหาวิทยาลัยพะเยาไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยกับบทความที่ตีพิมพ์เสมอไป ผู้สนใจสามารถคัดลอก และนำไปใช้ได้ แต่จะต้องขออนุมัติเจ้าของ และได้รับการอนุมัติเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรก่อน พร้อมกับมีการอ้างอิงและกล่าวคำขอบคุณให้ถูกต้องด้วย
The authors are themselves responsible for their contents. Signed articles may not always reflect the opinion of University of Phayao. The articles can be reproduced and reprinted, provided that permission is given by the authors and acknowledgement must be given.

